We are seeking a resolution to thus matter.

One of our victims was attacked and fully disabled in 2008. The victims were attacked in reprisal for helping law enforcement break a high-end crime case involving public officials. (The keywords: “Solyndra”, “Uranium1”, “Severstal”, “Cleantech Crash”, “Flashboy Algorithms” and related, should bring up the case matters in any forensic law enforcement database) (Court records case numbers are also available for additional investigation). Hundreds of thousands of case file records exist about this case.

Victim “A” had personal relationships with some of the most well-known public figures in the nation as proven in letters, videos and news photos. Victim “A” was an eye-witnesses to the crimes under investigation. Victim “A” was a federal contractor/employee.

The Victims have suffered a large number of attacks and many of those attacks (and the attackers) have been forensically tracked back to financing by the public officials under investigation.

We have contacted every law enforcement and regulatory agency already. Each of them finger-point to another agency in an endless blame-game and/or a “not-our-responsibility” stone-walling run-around.

The victims have suffered, and continue to suffer, violation of their civil, human and Constitutional rights.

The victims and their associates were induced to invest millions of dollars, and all of their life savings, in a government run project. It was later discovered that every government operator of that project was either financed by, friends, with, sleeping with, dating the staff of, holding stock market assets in, promised a revolving door job or government service contracts from, partying with, personal friends with, photographed at private events with, exchanging emails with, business associates of or directed by; the victims business adversaries, or the politicians that those business adversaries pay campaign finances to, or supply political digital search manipulation services to.

In addition to the damages from being defrauded by Government officials, each of the attacks on the victims has court precedent metrics, from other cases, that set a value to the additional damages suffered by the victims.

Legal causes of action include: ABUSE OF PROCESS; FTCA VIOLATIONS; ACCOUNT STATED; BREACH OF CONTRACT; CONVERSION; DEFAMATION; FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION; FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT; INJURIOUS FALSEHOOD, PRODUCT DISPARAGEMENT AND TRADE LIBEL; CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND VIOLATIONS OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION; MISAPPROPRIATION OF TRADE SECRETS; PRIMA FACIE TORT; QUANTUM MERUIT; TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE INCLUDING a.) Tortious interference with an existing contract, b.) Tortious interference with prospective, c.) Tortious interference with business relations contractual relations; PATENT INFRINGEMENT; PERSONAL INJURY; UNJUST ENRICHMENT; ANTI-TRUST LAW VIOLATIONS; LABOR LAW VIOLATIONS AND OTHER CAUSES.

In a past federal lawsuit, the victims won their lawsuit proving that government officials manipulated their funding applications.

Victim “A” is now unable to afford a lawyer. “Free” legal services, such as the government’s LSC Corporation, and all other pro bono lawyers have refused to assist because they are conflicted-out as their funding, or support, of one, or another political candidates puts them in conflict-of-interest.

David L. Anderson, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California, (San Francisco) and other U.S. Attorney’s were asked, in writing, to file a jury trial action on behalf of the Victim but they have not responded to communications.

The FBI has informed us that this is an ongoing active investigation involving major public officials. We have received case numbers from many agencies but those agencies do not provide case updates.

The attacks and damages include physical attacks; ramming of subjects car; death threats; exposure to toxic materials; SSA benefits blockades; tens of millions of dollars of Google/Gawker Media coordinated internet attacks and server manipulations and other tactics.

We demand damages, back-pay, back-benefits, expenses, legal fees and related costs but government officials have cut off our ability to get legal counsel.

How will you help our case?

 

This case is not about Democrats or Republicans. It is about organized crime, racketeering, mobsters and felony crimes.

White House Staff including Rahm Emanual, Bill Daley, Jay Carney, David Plouffe, Robert Gibbs, Steve Rattner, David Axelrod, John Podesta, et al; and The Secretary of Energy Steven Chu and the Chief Counsel for the United States Department of Energy Daniel Cohen and Bill Cooper were, (from 2007 forward), either financed by, friends, with, sleeping with, dating the staff of, holding stock market assets in, promised a revolving door job or government service contracts from, partying with, personal friends with, photographed at private events with, exchanging emails with, business associates of or directed by; our business adversaries, or the Senators and Department of Energy politicians that those business adversaries pay campaign finances to, or supply political digital search manipulation services to. Criminal U.S. Senators coordinated and profited in these schemes. Their own family members have now supplied evidence against them. Elon Musk and his frat boys display their self-aggrandizing vanity in sociopath glory because nobody tells them “no”. Now we are calling them out!

From 2007 forward, The White House and The Department Of Energy were controlled by the Silicon Valley tech oligarchs for monopolistic profiteering! That is a violation of the law, the Constitution and the American Way. The named person’s we have presented to the FBI, DOJ, SEC and other agencies, engaged in crimes to personally profit in the stock market and political venues. At the same time they operated the command and control of millions of dollars of defamation, character assassination and black-list attacks against us for reporting their crimes. These perpetrators are now being exposed, arrested, indicted and drained of their ill-gotten profits. We are owed our damages compensation and we will not rest until we get it! Every member of the public is invited to help crowd-source the termination of these corrupt crooks.

We worked for, with, in and around the White House and The Department of Energy. We were at the homes of the most famous people in government and their Silicon Valley financiers. We have cooperated with top law enforcement and Congressional investigators. Additional whistle-blowers have provided our effort with even more evidence. Ourselves, and investigating agencies, have absolute proof of the crimes, corruption and illicit activities and the ongoing cover-ups.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

James Bronkema, Tom Perkins, John Doerr and other well-known oligarchs, invited us to join their organized crime scam. We refused to be a part of their crimes and assisted federal investigators in their investigations and prosecutions of the Cartel operated by a group of technology insiders. The videos: “The Creepy Line”; “Omerta”; “Too Big To Fail”; The 60 Minutes Episodes: “Cleantech Crash”, “The Lobbyists Playbook”, “Congress Trading On Insider Information”; and hundreds of other news segments and documentaries cover these crimes and illicit schemes in great detail.

Since the 70’s Applicant has been a USPTO awarded inventor of seminal first-ever inventions now in use by billions of people globally and a program director of national projects. Applicant has been awarded federal commendations, state and federal innovation grants, government R&D contracts,

A group of domestic citizens filed FBI complaints and lawsuits against The President of the United States and his senior staff along with a lawsuit against a rogue off-shoot of the CIA called “In-Q-Tel”, a partner/financier of Google and Facebook. These citizens instigated Congressional corruption investigations and hearings against the most senior members of the State and Federal government. These actions resulted in the termination of very famous public officials and their crony criminal embezzlement scams and almost resulted in the President being forced to leave office, mid-term, based on revelations of a massive crony kick-back scheme which began to be exposed after the FBI raid of Solyndra. The director of the FBI was fired for assisting in cover-ups related to this matter.

This natural-born American domestic group of engineers was attacked with a $30 million dollar+ retribution/political reprisal program contracted by White House political operatives, and their appointees, who were also the business competitors of the engineers. The attackers used Fusion GPS-type character assassination smear campaigns (operated by their cronies at Google, Gawker, Gizmodo, Jalopnik and Facebook), NVCA black-listing, Solyndra-laundering, stone-walling, Lois Lerner-class agency manipulation and search engine rigging. In-Q-Tel turns out to be the only federally financed “charity” whose staff are also employed by each of the suspects in this case and who financed the suspects in this case. It was revealed that White House executives ordered government agencies to harm members of the public and to reprisal with-hold public resources from the public. This was a violation of tort, RICO and anti-trust laws.

The victims fought back.

With the encouragement of members of Congress they used 100% legal tools to interdict the corruption.

Essentially; they helped the United States government sue itself!

First, with a unique new kind of pioneering federal lawsuit, victims established — FOR THE FIRST TIME IN LEGAL HISTORY — that political cronyism is a valid basis for a claim of arbitrary-and-capricious agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act. See: Federal Case One, (D.D.C. 2015).

Second, they prevailed in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on their appeal of the district court’s ruling that an agency may escape judicial review of its action by requesting a voluntary remand but refusing to reconsider its initial denial of an application. See: Case Federal Two, (D.C. Cir. 2017). The Washington DC Circuit agreed with the victims that an agency may only seek a remand if it promises to reconsider its initial decision. It is because of that victory that the government, under court order is now re-doing the victims applications and GAO, FBI, IG’s and Congressional oversight offices are watching to assure effective ethics and transparency.

Third, these cases placed, on permanent public record, one of the most detailed documentation sets, ever assembled, about how modern political “Dark Money” conduits operate. The legal team hired ex-FBI, CIA and SEC experts to track down covert bank accounts, revolving door bribes, insider stock trades and other payola between the victim’s competitors and public officials. This documentation now prevents the use of those kinds of criminal efforts, in the future, by exposing their tactics to the public.

Fourth, the victim’s team engaged in the interdiction and termination of corrupt agency executives, contractors and their financiers. This included some of the most well-known names in Washington, DC, at the time. Many of them were, and are still being, investigated and surveilled by the FBI, GAO, SEC and Congress.

Fifth, and most important, the effort put every corrupt political scheme on notice that they WILL be found out and interdicted!

The bottom line?

The victims group WON on every single aspect of their public-interest goals but still have yet to be recompensed for their damages!

Now the “bad guys” have less options to engage in the corruption of our Democracy but the crime Cartel that operated these felonies has still not been arrested because the perpetrators have friendships and payola deals with some of the highest level executives in the intelligence and law enforcement agencies! The cover-ups are still going on! A President of The United States has now publicly testified to the veracity of this fact!

 

 

 

WITNESS STATEMENTS

 

A. My co-workers and I witnessed some guys stealing money from both, our company and the US Government Treasury. We reported it to the cops. It turned out to be part of one of the biggest embezzlement crimes ever exposed. Major political figures and tech “bosses” turned out to be running a “PayPal Tech Mafia”. The bad guys then began hunting us down and attacking us in reprisal “for the rest of our lives” per their threats and their ongoing retribution vendettas.

It was found that famous senators, their Silicon Valley oligarch financiers and their associates run an organized crime insider trading scam that abuses taxpayers and sabotages competing businesses. The terminations of the heads of the FBI, The Department of Energy and other famous people in politics is because of their operation, and cover-ups, of this case. The cover-ups are still going on. Our ability to get justice in this matter is still blockaded.

We will fight to the death to get justice because they tried to kill us, ruin our business and destroy our names. Every day an increasingly large number of the 300 million potential voters join the effort to expose, shame, dox, bankrupt, boycott and 100% legally exterminate the corrupt entities who did these illicit things by using our Democracy as their billionaire’s plaything.

Hundreds of the perpetrators have already been fired, placed under permanent public surveillance, financially tracked through every asset, reported to federal agencies and targeted for investigation.

This is a large part of all of that “political corruption” and “dirty Dark Money” politics you read about in the newspaper every day.

The goal is to interdict every single person, company and political operative group who is engaging in these crimes using crowd-sourced investigation and intelligence tools.

 

B. THIS CASE IS ENTIRELY ABOUT BRIBERY! If you thought that Mossack Fonseca and the Panama Papers was “The Story”: it was only the beginning! silicon valley’s politicians make policy that, both, ruins taxpayers while making the politicians rich by artificially inflating the value of the politicians secret stock market holdings. now we are exposing their entire scam!

 

C. This is about the Senators and their crony dark money political bribes and criminal kick-backs, the tech oligarchs who deployed the bribes and the victims of these crimes. imagine living in a world where almost every one of the public officials that were supposed to help you turned out to be your business competitors. imagine having them use government resources to profit at your expense, blockade you and treat democracy like a garage sale! this is that story! Google, Tesla, Facebook, Linkedin and their VC’s (and deeply bribed Senators) ordered and operated hit-jobs on the public and their competitors, supported by the Obama White House and U.S. Dept. of Energy. The FBI raided their scheme and the investigations tracked all the way back to the Oval Office! This is about a group of tech oligarchs, and their corrupt Senators, who commit crimes in order to manipulate over a trillion tax dollars (YOUR MONEY) into their, and their friends pockets. They are felons yet they control some of the offices of the agencies who are supposed to arrest them. Silicon Valley bought K Street and U.S. Senators, gave them more Dark Money than history has ever seen and then had giant tech-law firms bribe, hit-job and blockade any attempts to solve the problem.

D. Some of the largest bribes in American history were paid via billions of dollars of pre-IPO cleantech stock, insider trading, real estate, Google search engine rigging and shadow-banning, sex workers, revolving door jobs, nepotism, state-supported black-listing of competitors and under-the-table cash. Why are these Silicon Valley Oligarchs and their K-Street law firms and lobbyists immune from the law? U.S. Senators, Agency Heads and Congress are being bribed with:

– Billions of dollars of Google, Twitter, Facebook, Tesla, Netflix and Sony Pictures stock and stock warrants which is never reported to the FEC

– Billions of dollars of Google, Twitter, Facebook, Tesla, Netflix and Sony Pictures search engine rigging including shadow-banning, de-boosting, DNS re-routing, directed search suggestion, subliminal messaging bias, and hundreds of other psychological manipulation tricks; the value of which is never reported to the FEC but proven by invoices and bank payments between Google and Gawker, Gizmodo, DNC, Fusion GPS, Black Cube, etc.

– Free rent

– Prostitutes and Rent Boys

– Cars

– Dinners

– Party Financing

– Sports Event Tickets

– Campaign Services “Donations”

– Secret PAC Financing

– Jobs in Corporations in Silicon Valley For The Family Members of Those Who Take Bribes And Those Who Take Bribes, Themselves

– “Consulting” contracts from McKinsey as fronted pay-off gigs

– Overpriced “Speaking Engagements” which are really just pay-offs conduited for donors

 

– Private jet rides and use of Government fuel depots (ie: Google handed out NASA jet fuel to staff)

– Real Estate

– The use of Cayman, Boca Des Tores, Swiss and related laundering accounts

– The use of HSBC, Wells Fargo and Deustche Bank money laundering accounts

– Free spam and bulk mailing services owned by corporations

– Use of high tech law firms such as Perkins Coie, Wilson Sonsini, MoFo, Covington & Burling, etc. to conduit bribes to officials

While our investigators were able to get a law produced that made insider trading less attractive for Congress, nothing has been done to stop stock warant bribes and revolving door payola. Additionally, even with the new law, 60% of the U.S. Congress (including their associates and families) STILL engage in insider trading because law enforcement has not prosecuted many of them.

 

E. These crooks did this to anybody who they thought might expose the White House use of agencies as “slush-funds” and “Dark Money” campaign finance laundering conduits. They were afraid that exposure of these schemes would cause the President of the United States to be forced to resign in the middle of his term! The provided evidence, signed by thousands of reporters and investigators, that the suspects are: A.) Based around Silicon Valley and Washington DC; B.) Operating as a RICO-violating cartel; C.) Deeply sociopath and sexually disturbed; D.) Money laundering via large law firms and investment banks; E.) Using Google, Reddit, Facebook, etc. as mass political behavior-manipulation programs; F.) Paying for and operating character assassination programs against those who defy them; G.) Using “green energy” as one of their facades to steer tax dollars to the companies that they, and their friends, already own and work for; H.) Willing to resort to the most extreme things to protect their scheme; I). Living in an ideological “echo-chamber” in their tech bubbles; J.) Empowered entirely by the public’s lack of willingness to boycott them and demand their arrests. A vast number of individuals and companies, who are willing to testify about these crimes have NEVER BEEN ALLOWED into a Congressional hearing, court-room, FBI 302 interview, etc., because crooked Senators are terrified of the confirming testimony they can all provide.

 

F. We placed autonomous monitoring applications on a vast number of co-location servers, shared hosting ISPs, stand-alone servers and sites around the world over ten years ago and monitored: 1.) Google search results compared to other search engines, 2.) Google DNS and spoofing activities, 3.) Google results on 100 key search terms including search terms of assets, candidates and business associates connected to Google, 4.) Where Google sends data from users clicking on Google supplied links, 5.) Where fabricated mole data that was injected as user data ultimately ended up later, and other metrics. The results prove that Google abuses the market, the public, politics and human rights. Elon Musk boyfriends: Larry Page, Eric Schmidt, Jared Cohen and Sergy Brin at Google and Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook order their company staff to hide, down-rank, hole-punch the net, shadow-ban, stock market valuation manipulate and exclude this website on the internet. we track every technical trick they use and report it to congress and anti-trust agencies. the more they do it, the more they create evidence that will put them out of business!vThe Google empire controls most of the media on Earth, via many front corporations, and indoctrinates everyone in it’s organization using ‘cult’ methodologies. Google owner’s believe in “our-ideology-at-any-cost” and “the-ends-justify-the-means” scenarios. What could possibly go wrong?

 

G. Every single Dept of Energy executive, and related Senator, owns stock market assets in Tesla, Fisker, Solyndra, Ener1, etc. so they blockaded and sabotaged every applicant who competed with their holdings in a RICO-violating, felony organized crime, using taxpayer funds. If you are reading this, please demand a public Congressional Special Counsel investigation! Many of those character assassinated, sabotaged, black-listed, poisoned and shadow-banned are still waiting for justice!

 

H. The Silicon Valley Mafia is The Sandhill Road Venture Capital frat boy company bosses in Palo Alto, their National Venture Capital Association (NVCA) partners and the tech companies (Google, Tesla, Facebook, Amazon, Twitter, Linkedin, etc.) they control. They are sometimes referred to as The Deep State. They have purchased California, New York and Washington, DC politicians (mostly Senators) who they also control. They hire rogue ex-intelligence agents to operate attacks via Fusion GPS, The Gawker/Gizmodo/Jalopnik/Univision Hatchet-Job Fake Tabloid Facade (ie: Obama had White House staff: Robert Gibbs and John Podesta hire them, in association with Obama financier Elon Musk, to attack XP Vehicles, Bright Automotive and ZAP Vehicles as retribution in violation of anti-trust laws), Black Cube, ShareBlue, New America, In-Q-Tel, Podesta Group, Media Matters, etc. . They spend over $30M on each massive media attack program against competitors, reporters and outsiders. They collude on black-lists, valuation controls, election manipulation, search engine rigging, domestic spying for political manipulation, stock rigging, insider trading, executive prostitute clubs, trophy wife assignments, the bribery of politicians and worse. They are felons who pay politicians to halt investigations and interdiction efforts. They are widely covered in news media articles as: sex abusers, cult enthusiasts, elitists, rapists, woman beaters, sexual work extortion operators, extremists, arrogant clones of each other, tone deaf, echo-chamber reinforcing, misogynist, racist, manipulative, insecure, covertly gay, corrupt, thieves’ and other anti-social revelations.

The divorce and sex abuse court filings against the #PaloAltoMafia men of Silicon Valley are some of the most disturbing and sexually twisted court records you will ever read and they demonstrate a clear and decades-long pattern of collusion and depravity. From Google’s “Sex Slaves” to “Sex Penthouses” to “Deaths by Prostitute”; the list is endless.

They are not limited to California and also operate out of New York and Washington DC. They use their monopolistic control of the internet to massively and exclusively scale services that only they control and use to abuse public privacy, human rights, invention rights and information. They run their cartel like the old Italian Mafia once did.

 

 

 

The Hit Jobs

Here is just one of the ways google and the Nick Denton tabloids (Gawker, Gizmodo, Jalopnik, etc.) partnered to attack us, and other members of the public, in exchange for payments from White House staff and Silicon Valley oligarchs:

This is how google rigs elections and character assassination attacks around the globe as researched by Robert Epstein:

Authorities in the UK have finally figured out that fake news stories and Russian-placed ads are not the real problem. The UK Parliament is about to impose stiff penalties—not on the people who place the ads or write the stories, but on the Big Tech platforms that determine which ads and stories people actually see.

Parliament’s plans will almost surely be energized by the latest leak of damning material from inside Google’s fortress of secrecy: The Wall Street Journal recently reported on emails exchanged among Google employees in January 2017 in which they strategized about how to alter Google search results and other “ephemeral experiences” to counter President Donald Trump’s newly imposed travel ban. The company claims that none of these plans was ever implemented, but who knows?

While U.S. authorities have merely held hearings, EU authorities have taken dramatic steps in recent years to limit the powers of Big Tech, most recently with a comprehensive law that protects user privacy—the General Data Protection Regulation—and a whopping $5.1 billion fine against Google for monopolistic practices in the mobile device market. Last year, the European Union also levied a $2.7 billion fine against Google for filtering and ordering search results in a way that favored their own products and services. That filtering and ordering, it turns out, is of crucial importance.

As years of research I’ve been conducting on online influence has shown, content per se is not the real threat these days; what really matters is (a) which content is selected for users to see, and (b) the way that content is ordered in search results, search suggestions, news feeds, message feeds, comment lists, and so on. That’s where the power lies to shift opinions, purchases, and votes, and that power is held by a disturbingly small group of people.

I say “these days” because the explosive growth of a handful of massive platforms on the internet—the largest, by far, being Google and the next largest being Facebook—has changed everything. Millions of people and organizations are constantly trying to get their content in front of our eyes, but for more than 2.5 billion people around the world—soon to be more than 4 billion—the responsibility for what algorithms do should always lie with the people who wrote the algorithms and the companies that deployed them.

 

In randomized, controlled, peer-reviewed research I’ve conducted with thousands of people, I’ve shown repeatedly that when people are undecided, I can shift their opinions on just about any topic just by changing how I filter and order the information I show them. I’ve also shown that when, in multiple searches, I show people more and more information that favors one candidate, I can shift opinions even farther. Even more disturbing, I can do these things in ways that are completely invisible to people and in ways that don’t leave paper trails for authorities to trace.

Worse still, these new forms of influence often rely on ephemeral content—information that is generated on the fly by an algorithm and then disappears forever, which means that it would be difficult, if not impossible, for authorities to reconstruct. If, on Election Day this coming November, Mark Zuckerberg decides to broadcast go-out-and-vote reminders mainly to members of one political party, how would we be able to detect such a manipulation? If we can’t detect it, how would we be able to reduce its impact? And how, days or weeks later, would we be able to turn back the clock to see what happened?

Of course, companies like Google and Facebook emphatically reject the idea that their search and newsfeed algorithms are being tweaked in ways that could meddle in elections. Doing so would undermine the public’s trust in their companies, spokespeople have said. They insist that their algorithms are complicated, constantly changing, and subject to the “organic” activity of users.

This is, of course, sheer nonsense. Google can adjust its algorithms to favor any candidate it chooses no matter what the activity of users might be, just as easily as I do in my experiments. As legal scholar Frank Pasquale noted in his recent book “The Black Box Society,” blaming algorithms just doesn’t cut it; the responsibility for what an algorithm does should always lie with the people who wrote the algorithm and the companies that deployed the algorithm. Alan Murray, president of Fortune, recently framed the issue this way: “Rule one in the Age of AI: Humans remain accountable for decisions, even when made by machines.”

Given that 95 percent of donations from Silicon Valley generally go to Democrats, it’s hard to imagine that the algorithms of companies like Facebook and Google don’t favor their favorite candidates. A newly leaked video of a 2016 meeting at Google shows without doubt that high-ranking Google executives share a strong political preference, which could easily be expressed in algorithms. The favoritism might be deliberately programmed or occur simply because of unconscious bias. Either way, votes and opinions shift.

It’s also hard to imagine how, in any election in the world, with or without intention on the part of company employees, Google search results would fail to tilt toward one candidate. Google’s search algorithm certainly has no equal-time rule built into it; we wouldn’t want it to! We want it to tell us what’s best, and the algorithm will indeed always favor one dog food over another, one music service over another, and one political candidate over another. When the latter happens … votes and opinions shift.

Here are 10 ways—seven of which I am actively studying and quantifying—that Big Tech companies could use to shift millions of votes this coming November with no one the wiser. Let’s hope, of course, that these methods are not being used and will never be used, but let’s be realistic too; there’s generally no limit to what people will do when money and power are on the line.

1. Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME)

Ongoing research I began in January 2013 has shown repeatedly that when one candidate is favored over another in search results, voting preferences among undecided voters shift dramatically—by 20 percent or more overall, and by up to 80 percent in some demographic groups. This is partly because people place inordinate trust in algorithmically generated output, thinking, mistakenly, that algorithms are inherently objective and impartial.

But my research also suggests that we are conditioned to believe in high-ranking search results in much the same way that rats are conditioned to press levers in Skinner boxes. Because most searches are for simple facts (“When was Donald Trump born?”), and because correct answers to simple questions inevitably turn up in the first position, we are taught, day after day, that the higher a search result appears in the list, the more true it must be. When we finally search for information to help us make a tough decision (“Who’s better for the economy, Trump or Clinton?”), we tend to believe the information on the web pages to which high-ranking search results link.

As The Washington Post reported last year, in 2016, I led a team that developed a system for monitoring the election-related search results Google, Bing, and Yahoo were showing users in the months leading up to the presidential election, and I found pro-Clinton bias in all 10 search positions on the first page of Google’s search results. Google responded, as usual, that it has “never re-ranked search results on any topic (including elections) to manipulate political sentiment”—but I never claimed it did. I found what I found, namely that Google’s search results favored Hillary Clinton; “re-ranking”—an obtuse term Google seems to have invented to confuse people—is irrelevant.

Because (a) many elections are very close, (b) 90 percent of online searches in most countries are conducted on just one search engine (Google), and (c) internet penetration is high in most countries these days—higher in many countries than it is in the United States—it is possible that the outcomes ofupwards of 25 percent of the world’s national elections are now being determined by Google’s search algorithm, even without deliberate manipulation on the part of company employees. Because, as I noted earlier, Google’s search algorithm is not constrained by equal-time rules, it almost certainly ends up favoring one candidate over another in most political races, and that shifts opinions and votes.

2. Search Suggestion Effect (SSE)

When Google first introduced autocomplete search suggestions—those short lists you see when you start to type an item into the Google search bar—it was supposedly meant to save you some time. Whatever the original rationale, those suggestions soon turned into a powerful means of manipulation that Google appears to use aggressively.

My recent research suggests that (a) Google starts to manipulate your opinions from the very first character you type, and (b) by fiddling with the suggestions it shows you, Google can turn a 50–50 split among undecided voters into a 90–10 split with no one knowing. I call this manipulation the Search Suggestion Effect (SSE), and it is one of the most powerful behavioral manipulations I have ever seen in my nearly 40 years as a behavioral scientist.

How will you know whether Google is messing with your election-related search suggestions in the weeks leading up to the election? You won’t.

3. The Targeted Messaging Effect (TME)

If, on Nov. 8, 2016, Mr. Zuckerberg had sent go-out-and-vote reminders just to supporters of Mrs. Clinton, that would likely have given her an additional 450,000 votes. I’ve extrapolated that number from Facebook’s own published data.

Because Zuckerberg was overconfident in 2016, I don’t believe he sent those messages, but he is surely not overconfident this time around. In fact, it’s possible that, at this very moment, Facebook and other companies are sending out targeted register-to-vote reminders, as well as targeted go-out-and-vote reminders in primary races. Targeted go-out-and-vote reminders might also favor one party on Election Day in November.

My associates and I are building systems to monitor such things, but because no systems are currently in place, there is no sure way to tell whether Twitter, Google, and Facebook (or Facebook’s influential offshoot, Instagram) are currently tilting their messaging. No law or regulation specifically forbids the practice, and it would be an easy and economical way to serve company needs. Campaign donations cost money, after all, but tilting your messaging to favor one candidate is free.

4. Opinion Matching Effect (OME)

In March 2016, and continuing for more than seven months until Election Day, Tinder’s tens of millions of users could not only swipe to find sex partners, they could also swipe to find out whether they should vote for Trump or Clinton. The website iSideWith.com—founded and run by “two friends” with no obvious qualifications—claims to have helped more than 49 million people match their opinions to the right candidate. Both CNN and USA Today have run similar services, currently inactive.

I am still studying and quantifying this type of, um, helpful service, but so far it looks like (a) opinion matching services tend to attract undecided voters—precisely the kinds of voters who are most vulnerable to manipulation, and (b) they can easily produce opinion shifts of 30 percent or more without people’s awareness.

At this writing, iSideWith is already helping people decide who they should vote for in the 2018 New York U.S. Senate race, the 2018 New York gubernatorial race, the 2018 race for New York District 10 of the U.S. House of Representatives, and, believe it or not, the 2020 presidential race. Keep your eyes open for other matching services as they turn up, and ask yourself this: Who wrote those algorithms, and how can we know whether they are biased toward one candidate or party?

5. Answer Bot Effect (ABE)

More and more these days, people don’t want lists of thousands of search results, they just want the answer, which is being supplied by personal assistants like Google Home devices, the Google Assistant on Android devices, Amazon’s Alexa, Apple’s Siri, and Google’s featured snippets—those answer boxesat the top of Google search results. I call the opinion shift produced by such mechanisms the Answer Bot Effect (ABE).

My research on Google’s answer boxes shows three things so far: First, they reduce the time people spend searching for more information. Second, they reduce the number of times people click on search results. And third, they appear to shift opinions 10 to 30 percent more than search results alone do. I don’t yet know exactly how many votes can be shifted by answer bots, but in a national election in the United States, the number might be in the low millions.

6. Shadow-banning

Recently, Trump complained that Twitter was preventing conservatives from reaching many of their followers on that platform through shadowbanning, the practice of quietly hiding a user’s posts without the user knowing. The validity of Trump’s specific accusation is arguable, but the fact remains that any platform on which people have followers or friends can be rigged in a way to suppress the views and influence of certain individuals without people knowing the suppression is taking place. Unfortunately, without aggressive monitoring systems in place, it’s hard to know for sure when or even whether shadowbanning is occurring.

7. Programmed Virality and the Digital Bandwagon Effect (The manually pumped Streisand Effect)

Big Tech companies would like us to believe that virality on platforms like YouTube or Instagram is a profoundly mysterious phenomenon, even while acknowledging that their platforms are populated by tens of millions of fake accounts that might affect virality.

In fact, there is an obvious situation in which virality is not mysterious at all, and that is when the tech companies themselves decide to shift high volumes of traffic in ways that suit their needs. And aren’t they always doing this? Because Facebook’s algorithms are secret, if an executive decided to bestow instant Instagram stardom on a pro-Elizabeth Warren college student, we would have no way of knowing that this was a deliberate act and no way of countering it.

The same can be said of the virality of YouTube videos and Twitter campaigns; they are inherently competitive—except when company employees or executives decide otherwise. Google has an especially powerful and subtle way of creating instant virality using a technique I’ve dubbed the Digital Bandwagon Effect. Because the popularity of websites drives them higher in search results, and because high-ranking search results increase the popularity of websites (SEME), Google has the ability to engineer a sudden explosion of interest in a candidate or cause with no one—perhaps even people at the companies themselves—having the slightest idea they’ve done so. In 2015, I published a mathematical model showing how neatly this can work.

8. The Facebook Effect

Because Facebook’s ineptness and dishonesty have squeezed it into a digital doghouse from which it might never emerge, it gets its own precinct on my list.

In 2016, I published an article detailing five ways that Facebook could shift millions of votes without people knowing: biasing its trending box, biasing its center newsfeed, encouraging people to look for election-related material in its search bar (which it did that year!), sending out targeted register-to-vote reminders, and sending out targeted go-out-and-vote reminders.

I wrote that article before the news stories broke about Facebook’s improper sharing of user data with multiple researchers and companies, not to mention the stories about how the company permitted fake news stories to proliferate on its platform during the critical days just before the November election—problems the company is now trying hard to mitigate. With the revelations mounting, on July 26, 2018, Facebook suffered the largest one-day drop in stock value of any company in history, and now it’s facing a shareholder lawsuit and multiple fines and investigations in both the United States and the EU.

Facebook desperately needs new direction, which is why I recently called for Zuckerberg’s resignation. The company, in my view, could benefit from the new perspectives that often come with new leadership.

9. Censorship

I am cheating here by labeling one category “censorship,” because censorship—the selective and biased suppression of information—can be perpetrated in so many different ways.

Shadowbanning could be considered a type of censorship, for example, and in 2016, a Facebook whistleblower claimed he had been on a company team that was systematically removing conservative news stories from Facebook’s newsfeed. Now, because of Facebook’s carelessness with user data, the company is openly taking pride in rapidly shutting down accounts that appear to be Russia-connected—even though company representatives sometimes acknowledge that they “don’t have all the facts.”

Meanwhile, Zuckerberg has crowed about his magnanimity in preserving the accounts of people who deny the Holocaust, never mentioning the fact that provocative content propels traffic that might make him richer. How would you know whether Facebook was selectively suppressing material that favored one candidate or political party? You wouldn’t. (For a detailed look at nine ways Google censors content, see my essay “The New Censorship,” published in 2016.)

10. The Digital Customization Effect (DCE)

Any marketer can tell you how important it is to know your customer. Now, think about that simple idea in a world in which Google has likely collected the equivalent of millions of Word pages of information about you. If you randomly display a banner ad on a web page, out of 10,000 people, only five are likely to click on it; that’s the CTR—the “clickthrough rate” (0.05 percent). But if you target your ad, displaying it only to people whose interests it matches, you can boost your CTR a hundredfold.

That’s why Google, Facebook, and others have become increasingly obsessed with customizing the information they show you: They want you to be happily and mindlessly clicking away on the content they show you.

In the research I conduct, my impact is always larger when I am able to customize information to suit people’s backgrounds. Because I know very little about the participants in my experiments, however, I am able to do so in only feeble ways, but the tech giants know everything about you—even things you don’t know about yourself. This tells me that the effect sizes I find in my experiments are probably too low. The impact that companies like Google are having on our lives is quite possibly much larger than I think it is. Perhaps that doesn’t scare you, but it sure scares me.

The Same Direction

OK, you say, so much for Epstein’s list! What about those other shenanigans we’ve heard about: voter fraud (Trump’s explanation for why he lost the popular vote), gerrymandering, rigged voting machines, targeted ads placed by Cambridge Analytica, votes cast over the internet, or, as I mentioned earlier, those millions of bots designed to shift opinions. What about hackers like Andrés Sepúlveda, who spent nearly a decade using computer technology to rig elections in Latin America? What about all the ways new technologies make dirty tricks easier in elections? And what about those darn Russians, anyway?

To all that I say: kid stuff. Dirty tricks have been around since the first election was held millennia ago. But unlike the new manipulative tools controlled by Google and Facebook, the old tricks are competitive—it’s your hacker versus my hacker, your bots versus my bots, your fake news stories versus my fake news stories—and sometimes illegal, which is why Sepúlveda’s efforts failed many times and why Cambridge Analytica is dust.

“Cyberwar,” a new book by political scientist Kathleen Hall Jamieson, reminds us that targeted ads and fake news stories can indeed shift votes, but the numbers are necessarily small. It’s hard to overwhelm your competitor when he or she can play the same games you are playing.

Now, take a look at my numbered list. The techniques I’ve described can shift millions of votes without people’s awareness, and because they are controlled by the platforms themselves, they are entirely noncompetitive. If Google or Facebook or Twitter wants to shift votes, there is no way to counteract their manipulations. In fact, at this writing, there is not even a credible way of detecting those manipulations.

And what if the tech giants are all leaning in the same political direction? What if the combined weight of their subtle and untraceable manipulative power favors one political party? If 150 million people vote this November in the United States, with 20 percent still undecided at this writing (that’s 30 million people), I estimate that the combined weight of Big Tech manipulations could easily shift upwards of 12 million votes without anyone knowing. That’s enough votes to determine the outcomes of hundreds of close local, state, and congressional races throughout the country, which makes the free-and-fair election little more than an illusion.

Full disclosure: I happen to think that the political party currently in favor in Silicon Valley is, by a hair (so to speak), the superior party at the moment. But I also love America and democracy, and I believe that the free-and-fair election is the bedrock of our political system. I don’t care how “right” these companies might be; lofty ends do not justify shady means, especially when those means are difficult to see and not well understood by either authorities or the public.

Can new regulations or laws save us from the extraordinary powers of manipulation the Big Tech companies now possess? Maybe, but our leaders seem to be especially regulation-shy these days, and I doubt, in any case, whether laws and regulations will ever be able to keep up with the new kinds of threats that new technologies will almost certainly pose in coming years.

I don’t believe we are completely helpless, however. I think that one way to turn Facebook, Google, and the innovative technology companies that will succeed them, into responsible citizens is to set upsophisticated monitoring systems that detect, analyze, and archive what they’re showing people—in effect, to fight technology with technology.

As I mentioned earlier, in 2016, I led a team that monitored search results on multiple search engines. That was a start, but we can do much better. These days, I’m working with business associates and academic colleagues on three continents to scale up systems to monitor a wide range of information the Big Tech companies are sharing with their users—even the spoken answers provided by personal assistants. Ultimately, a worldwide ecology of passive monitoring systems will make these companies accountable to the public, with information bias and online manipulation detectable in real time.

With November drawing near, there is obviously some urgency here. At this writing, it’s not clear whether we will be fully operational in time to monitor the midterm elections, but we’re determined to be ready for 2020.

– Robert Epstein is a senior research psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology in California.

 

 

Our Complaint to The FTC

We have asked FTC task force will take on Silicon Valley tech monopolies and has 1000 page report about Facebook, Tesla, Paypal and Google monopoly crimes from San Francisco insiders

OUR TEAM IS REPORTING DIRECTLY TO THE FTC INVESTIGATORS

And they’re going to look at previous mergers

By Makena Kelly

The Federal Trade Commission will be launching a task force to monitor competition in the US’s technology markets, commissioners announced today.

The task force will include current officials working in the agency’s Bureau of Competition in order to “enhance the Bureau’s focus on technology-related sectors of the economy, including markets in which online platforms compete.” It will also include 17 staff attorneys who will be tasked with investigating anti-competitive behavior in the tech industry.

“The role of technology in the economy and in our lives grows more important every day,” FTC Chairman Joe Simons said. “As I’ve noted in the past, it makes sense for us to closely examine technology markets to ensure consumers benefit from free and fair competition.”

“Technology markets … raise distinct challenges for antitrust enforcement”

The new task force comes amid growing pressure for antitrust action against large tech companies like Facebook and Google. Earlier this month, it was reported that FTC officials have been looking to levy a multibillion-dollar fine on Facebook for repeatedly violating a privacy agreement the two bodies came to back in 2011. A coalition of advocacy groups argued that a fine would not be enough to incentivize Facebook to be more cautious with consumer data and asked the FTC to force the company spinoffs, Instagram and WhatsApp, back into their own entities once again. The groups argued that Facebook was too big for it to adequately care for user data for all three major apps.

Discussion over retroactive merger reviews that may result in companies divesting previously approved assets has been heating up over the last few months. The Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee has been reportedly beefing up its antitrust arm and hiring on big names like Lina Khan in the academic sphere.

“Technology markets, which are rapidly evolving and touch so many other sectors of the economy, raise distinct challenges for antitrust enforcement,” said Bureau Director Bruce Hoffman. “By centralizing our expertise and attention, the new task force will be able to focus on these markets exclusively – ensuring they are operating pursuant to the antitrust laws, and taking action where they are not.”

Hoffman confirmed that the task force would look into consummated mergers, but could not name any investigations specifically. When it comes to remedies for problematic mergers, Hoffman said that firms could be “broken out,” or could be forced to “spin off” previous acquisitions as new competitors in order to recreate the markets pre-merger.

Hoffman said that the task force would be working closely with the FTC’s Consumer Protection Bureau as it relates to consumer privacy enforcement especially in cases in which these issues coalesce.

“Our ongoing Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century are a crucial step to deepen our understanding of these markets and potential competitive issues. The Technology Task Force is the next step in that effort,” Simons said in the press release.

The Justice Department, which also has antitrust jurisdiction, is aware of the FTC’s new task force, according to Hoffman, and both agencies will continue to work separately on this front.

https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2019-02-27/billionaire-list-shows-1t-hit-from-18-market-meltdown

 

Investigation Report
– Apex Consulting Services

THE ATTACK AGAINST A CITIZEN AS VENDETTA FOR REPORTING A CORRUPTION CRIME TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CONGRESS

(revision 2.4)

The FBI, special investigators and Congressional researchers say that there were only a handful of powerful people capable of operating attacks of this scale and sophistication against the victim.

In Sweitzer, T. (1996, September). Kill or be killed. [Electronic version] Campaigns & Elections, 17(9), 46-47., the process used to “kill” others is described just as it was used against the victim. In https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/ the formal process of hired character assassination, exactly as it was used against the victim, is detailed. The well-documented process is further outlined in the articles:

Character assassination – Wikiquote

All of the attackers people are U.S. Government senior officials working in the White House and/or the U.S. Senate and/or their Silicon Valley oligarch political campaign financiers.

Every one of the attack technologies and resources were previously deployed against Presidential candidates in past elections. The providers, operators and compensation conduits of the attack services are known to law enforcement. The payment records have been uncovered, revealing that over $30M of attack services billings and/or in-kind services exchanges were incurred by the attackers. By way of contrast: $30M is the typical WEEKLY expenditure for opposition character assassination programs in a U.S. Presidential election using Gawker, Gizmodo, Facebook, Google and Fusion GPS media attack services.

The Victim and his peers swear, warrant and certify that this is true. The Victim’s representatives can prove in a Grand Jury, Civil Jury and Congressional Hearing that White House staff, U.S. Senators and their Silicon Valley financiers did order, operate and finance a massive “hit-job” on the Victim as revenge/retribution/vendetta because he reported an organized crime activity involving well known public officials.

EVERY PUBLIC OFFICIAL WHO WAS, BY LAW, SUPPOSED TO HELP THE Victim HAS, SO FAR, BEEN PROVEN BY INVESTIGATORS TO HAVE BEEN IN DIRECT BUSINESS COMPETITION WITH Victim VIA THEIR “OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES”.

The effort made by political executives to steer the annual expenditure of trillions of dollars of taxpayer funds and stock market profits to one group of friends or another.

It is called “Cronyism” and it is operated by U.S. Senators and White House staff for illicit profiteering purposes.

The corrupt public officials involved here used real estate, stock market ownership, revolving door payola jobs and investment bank accounts to profiteer from each deal that the charged officials pushed.

FBI-level tracking of the covert accounts, trusts, shell corporations, family members and associates of every public official involved in this case proves that they made money by competing with the Victim’s business ventures. The Panama Papers Leaks, Swiss Leaks, Snowden Leaks, and all of the other leaks prove this as fact.

THE ATTACKERS

How A Modern Character Assassination and Political “Kill Order” Was Executed By Politicians, and their Silicon Valley Oligarchs, Against The Victim:

This is how a vendetta, revenge and political payback operation was implemented against an American taxpayer when a Senator issued a “kill order” on a whistle-blower

Investigations have revealed that the White House and California Senators hired the character assassination and defamation attack services: Cardinal & Pine; Pacronym, Acronym;  The Americano; Investing in US; Shadow Inc; Courier Newsroom; IN-Q-Tel; Gawker Media; Jalopnik; Gizmodo Media; K2 Intelligence; WikiStrat; Podesta Group; Fusion GPS; Google; YouTube; Alphabet; Facebook; Twitter; Think Progress; Media Matters); Black Cube; Correct The Record; Orbis Business Intelligence, Undercover Global Ltd; Stratfor; Jigsaw; ShareBlue/Acronym; Versa LLC; American Ledger; Supermajority News; New Venture Fund; Sixteen Thirty Fund; Cambridge Analytica; Sid Blumenthal; States Newsroom; Hopewell Fund;  Open Society.; David Brock; AmpliFire News; American Bridge; Plouffe Consulting; Pantsuit Nation; MotiveAI; American Bridge 21st Century Foundation; Priorities USA; PR Firm Sunshine Sachs; The American Independent Foundation; Covington and Burling; Buzzfeed; The American Independent; Perkins Coie; Secondary Infektion; Wilson Sonsini and thousands more to run hit-jobs, character assassinations, dirty tricks and economic reprisal attacks on any targets who reported the crimes. Each of those companies are now under federal and civil investigation. Most of these businesses offer the service of manipulating elections and news coverage in order to steer stock market profits into the pockets of billionaire clients at the expense of the taxpayer and Democracy. They hide their transactions via money-laundering. All of these services, when focused on individual citizens, are lethal.

These attackers deserve to be punished for the rest of their lives for taking away the lives of others in exchange for remuneration. Any company who is corrupt enough to hire any of these assassins should be forced out of business.

These attack services are responsible for 90% of the “Fake News” problem in the world because they are the authors of most fake news. Congress must act to make these kinds of companies illegal!

These digital assassination services offer hit-jobs, character assassinations and economic reprisal programs to famous billionaires and corrupt politicians who are seeking revenge, retribution and vendetta executions.

These are the specific attacks undertaken against the victim:

– Government agency bosses solicited the target with false promises of future loans, contracts or grants from their agency and caused the target victim to expend millions of dollars and years of their time for projects which those government bosses had covertly promised to their friends. They used the target victim as a “smokescreen” to cover their illegal government slush-funds for the victims competitors and personal enemies. By using this tactic, the attackers drain the target victims funds and forced victim into an economic disaster without the government bosses fearing any reprisal for their scam in which they made billions of dollars in profit in the notorious Solyndra scandals as seen in the CBS 60 Minutes episode: “The Cleantech Crash”, thousands of TV news segments and the related GAO and Congressional corruption reports.

– Government officials and LSC corporation (A federal agency dedicated to providing legal services to victims) blockaded victim’s rights to legal representation in order to prevent victim from personally suing the attackers because such a lawsuit would have embarrassed corrupt public officials. High tech law firms that were discussing a services agreement with victim were threatened and ordered to not help victim or “they would be black-listed or be cut-off from tens of millions of dollars of Google, Netflix, Facebook and government contracts”. Individual lawyers were threatened with black-listing and getting “flooded with more filings than you could ever respond to in your life-time...” LSC officials, who were almost entirely Obama Administration associates, refused to assist with lawyer referrals, which is against their federal contract.

– An sophisticated animated attack film was produced attacking victim. An animated film is an expensive effort involving considerable time and expense. An attacker must be well financed to undertake such an effort. The film was published on YouTube and locked onto the very top search result line on every YouTube search in front of 5 billion internet users for over a decade. The damage to victim’s reputation is estimated in the tens of millions of dollars. YouTube steadfastly refused to remove or adjust the search results even though YouTube executives knew victim and knew that the video represented a character assassination attempt against victim because YouTube owners finance the political campaigns of the public officials who ordered the attacks. While Google/YouTube stated to Congress that all of it’s search results are arbitrary, the never-moving search result of this attack video proved that Google’s and YouTube’s search results are manually manipulated by human maintained black-lists.

– Social networking sites including MeetUp, Match, Facebook, etc. and all other IAC-owned, or similar, sites (IAC is managed by Hillary Clinton’s daughter, whose Mother knew victim) have had their profiles, texts, and inter-member communications, since those companies were started, hacked or purchased. The financiers of almost everyone of these sites are also the financiers of the suspects. The attack service providers use Palantir , In-Q-Tel financed data analysis software to analyze every activity in those services in order to find honey-trap, blackmail and social conflict exploitation opportunities. Your social life will, essentially, end. Every photo on every social site is cross checked with every other photo on the internet in order to cull your Facebook, Linkedin, Snapchat and other social media together to create a total manipulation profile data file on you. New contacts on these sites were contacted by the attackers and told to “avoid” the victim in order to damage victim.

– Social Security, SSI, SDI, Disability and other earned benefits were stone-walled. Applications for benefits for the victim were intentionally “lost” like a “Lois Lerner hard drive”. Files in the application process “disappeared”. A U.S. Senator ordered Victim’s benefits to “never be approved” even though victim worked 60 hour+ weeks for decades in service to their nation and their community. A SSA official in the local SSA office, who had a devout expressed hatred against one United States President ordered a benefits blockade against victim because he found out that victim’s ex-lawyer now worked in the White House.

– Government officials and tech oligarchs contacted members of the National Venture Capital association (NVCA) and created national “black-lists” to blockade victim from receiving investor funding. This was also confirmed in a widely published disclosure by Tesla Motors Daryl Siry and in published testimony. If Silicon Valley political campaign finance oligarchs black-list you (see the “AngelGate” Scandal and the “High Tech No Poaching Class Action Lawsuit” cases) you will never get investor funding again.

– Federal FOIA requests were hidden, frozen, stone-walled, delayed, lied about and only partially responded to in order to seek to hide information and run cover-ups.

– State and federal officials play an endless game of Catch-22 by arbitrarily determining that deadlines had passed that they, the government officials, had stonewalled and obfuscated applications for, in order to force these deadlines that they set, to appear to be missed.

– Victims was found to be strangely poisoned, not unlike the Alexander Litvenko case. Heavy metals and toxic materials were found right after victim’s work with the Department of Energy weapons and energy facilities. Many wonder if victim was intentionally exposed to toxins in retribution for their testimony. The federal MSDS documents clearly show that a number of victims were exposed to deadly compounds and radiations, via DOE, without being provided with proper HazMat suits which DOE officials knew were required.

– Victims employers were called, and faxed, and ordered to fire target victims from their places of employment, in the middle of the day, with no notice, as a retribution tactic.

– On orders from Obama White House officials Google, YouTube, Gawker Media and Gizmodo Media produced attack articles and defamation videos. Google locked these contrived attack articles from the Nicholas Guido Denton tabloid empire on the top line, of the front page of all Google searches for a decade in front of 7.5 billion people, around the world. This attack-type uses over $40 million dollars in server farms, production costs and internet rigging. The forensic data acquired from tracking some of these attacks proves that Google rigged these attacks against victim on the internet and that all of Google’s “impressions” are manually controlled by Google’s executives who are also the main financiers and policy directors of the Obama Administration. This data was provided to the European Union for it’s ongoing prosecution of Google’s political manipulation of public perceptions. Hired attackers Nicholas Guido Denton, John Herman, Adrian Covert, Ian Fette, Patrick George, Gabrielle Darbyshire and John Cook have been referred to the FBI for surveillance, tracking and interview relative to the command, control and compensation for those attacks.

– Victims HR and employment records, on Taleo, Palantir and EVERY recruiting and hiring database, was embedded with negative keywords and “flags” in order to prevent the victim from ever gaining future employment.

– Gary D. Conley, Seth Rich, Rajeev Motwani who victim knew, and many other whistle-blowers in these matters, turned up dead under strange circumstances. Victim has received ongoing death threats for his help to federal investigations in the larger organized crime investigation relative to this matter.

– Paypal (A DNC-biased operation) and other on-line payments for on-line sales by victim are de-platformed, delayed, hidden, or re-directed in order to terminate income potential for target who competed with the attackers interests and holdings. This further denied victim income. As a test, victim built an online store with hundreds of thousands of products and marketed it globally. Trackers, placed by victim’s technicians, on servers, discovered that Paypal and an outside “Virgina-based system” were DNS and payment re-directed all traffic away from the store so that victim received no traffic and no income. In DNS redirection, “website spoofing” sends target victims websites to dead ends where no sales orders or customer inquiries actually get back to the target. These internet revenue activity manipulations are conducted using outside covert servers operated by the attackers and revealed in the Snowden Leaks. All commercial storefronts and on-line sales attempts by target victims, had their sites hidden, or search engine de-linked by a massively resourced facility located in Virginia, Texas or Palo Alto, California in order to terminate revenue potentials for the victim.

– Contracted trolls, shills, botnets and synth-blog deployments are deployed to place defamatory statements and disinformation about victim in front of 7.5 billion people around the world on the internet in order to seek to damage their federal testimony credibility by a massively resourced facility. Some of these troll farms were uncovered in Russia, Ukraine, Israel and Brazil.

– Campaign finance dirty tricks contractors were hired by campaign financiers to attack the friends and family members of the target victim in order to create low morale for the target victims psyche and motivation.

– In one case covert political partner: Google, transferred large sums of cash to dirty tricks contractors and then manually locked the media portion of the attacks into the top lines of the top pages of all Google searches globally, for years, with hidden embedded codes in the links and web-pages which multiplied the attacks on Victims by many magnitudes.

– Covert Cartel financier: Google, placed Google’s lawyer: Michelle Lee, in charge of the U.S. Patent Office and she, in turn, stacked all of the U.S. Patent Office IPR and ALICE review boards and offices with Google-supporting employees in order to rig the U.S. Patent Office to protect Google from being prosecuted for the vast patent thefts that Google engages in. Google has hundreds of patent lawsuits for technology theft and a number of those lawsuits refer to Google’s operations as “Racketeering”, “Monopolistic Cartel” and “Government Coup-like” behaviors. Thousands of articles and investigations detail the fact that Google, “essentially” ran the Obama White House and provided over 80% of the key White House staff. A conflict-of-interest unlike any in American history. Google’s investors personally told Victim they would “kill him”. Google and the Obama Administration were “the same entity”. Victim testified in the review that got Michelle Lee terminated and uncovered a tactical political and social warfare group inside Google who were financed by Federal and State funds.

– “Honeytraps” and moles were employed by the attackers. In this tactic, people who covertly worked for the attackers were employed to approach the “target” in order to spy on and misdirect the subject.

– Gawker Media, Gizmodo Media, Snopes, SPLC and other hired media assassins were retained to produce “hatchet job” character assassination articles about victim. Then those articles were faxed, mailed and emailed to Kaiser Permanente and investors with a note saying: “You don’t want to have anything to do with this person, do you..?” in order to get victim fired from their job and get victim’s loans or financing pulled. The attackers use their round one attack media, that they authored, to create a round two second wave attack designed to end victim’s life status via economic warfare.

– Mortgage and rental applications had red flags added to them in databases to prevent the targets from getting homes or apartments.

– Krebs On Security, Wired, Ars Technica, The Wall Street Journal and most major IT publications have reported that hundreds of spy “back-doors” have been found on every Intel, AMD, Apple, Xfinity, Cisco, Microsoft, Juniper Networks motherboard, chip-set and hardware component set. This means that the attackers used a “key” code can open any of victims computer, server, router, cloud-network or other network connected device and read every file, photo, video, your calendar and email on devices at any time from any location on Earth. This has been widely reported on by Glenn Greenwald, Edward Snowden, Scahill, Cheryl K of CBS News and others. Victim was hacked at least 10 times. In a number of instances, people, who victim had been communicating with online, were mysteriously contacted by a third party who sent them the Gizmodo attack article or phoned them with warnings to avoid victim. These kinds of Man-In-The-Middle interceptions would only have been possible from hacking and MITM surveillance tactics.

– McCarthy-Era “Black-lists” were created and employed against target victims who competed with Obama Administration executives and their campaign financiers to prevent them from getting funding and future employment. This White House process is known as “RatFucking”, a tactic that is documented in a variety of published reports and on Wikipedia.

– The housing rights of Victim were stalled in reprisal. Public records show that tens of thousands of other Victims were moved ahead of victim even though victim’s validation metrics exceeded those of almost every other Victim. Victim was “black-listed”.

Federal law enforcement, the United States Congress and the highest level investigators in the U.S., and abroad, have documented (per the “FISA Memo”, Congressional Reports and federal employee testimony) and proven the fact that the Obama Administration regularly engaged in the operation of retribution, vendetta and reprisal campaigns known as “hit-jobs” against domestic natural born U.S. citizen domestic taxpayers. The Federal Court, in at least one previous court case, has ruled that the corporation in which victim was an investor, in this particular matter, were the victims and target of a number of these attacks designed to inflict permanent medical, emotional, character assassination, brand negation, economic and career damage.

EXAMPLES OF THE ATTACKERS TARGETING OTHERS:

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/they-literally-know-nothing-ben-rhodes-bragged-about-manipulating-clueless-reporters/

https://freedom.press/news/revealed-justice-depts-secret-rules-targeting-journalists-fisa-court-orders/

https://freedom.press/news/lawsuit-seeks-government-guidelines-surveillance-journalists-leak-investigations-surge/

http://www.attacked.biz

http://www.google-is-a-mobster.com

https://knightcolumbia.org/

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/brennan-and-clapper-accused-of-hacking-john-roberts-to-blackmail-him/

https://freedom.press/news/revealed-justice-depts-secret-rules-targeting-journalists-fisa-court-orders/

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/heres-why-obama-clearly-ordered-the-spying-on-trump/

https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/17/lindsey-graham-dems-kavanaugh/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/okeefe-strikes-again-project-veritas-exposes-doj-official-using-govt-databases-to-stalk-business-owners-video/

https://www.politico.com/gallery/16-worst-political-dirty-tricks

http://artofverbalwar.com/2016/11/03/quick-dirty-guide-political-debate-tactics/

https://politicaldictionary.com/topics/dirty-tricks/

https://www.learntoinfluence.com/dirty-tricks-and-office-politics/

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/11/election-dirty-tricks/

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/21/us/politics/video-dnc-trump-rallies.html

http://freakonomics.com/2007/11/06/the-complete-history-of-dirty-politics-a-qa-on-anything-for-a-vote/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratfucking

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-npr-video-and-political-dirty-tricks/2011/03/17/ABbyMym_story.html

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/rich-rubino/dirty-political-tricks-from-american-politics_b_9324226.html

http://www.electomatic.com/dirty-campaign-techniques/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

https://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/29/obamas.first.campaign/

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/05/us/politics/dirty-tricks-vandalism-and-the-dark-side-of-politics.html

https://whyy.org/articles/political-dirty-tricks-are-a-staple-of-modern-politics/

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/19/cambridge-analytica-execs-boast-dirty-tricks-honey-traps-elections

https://medium.com/@j363j/how-roger-stones-campaign-of-tammany-hall-political-corruption-lead-to-trump-russia-3099d87784e

https://www.bridgemi.com/detroit-journalism-cooperative/lawsuits-dirty-tricks-and-angry-ex-wife-detroits-ugliest-election

https://www.salon.com/2016/03/25/hillary_clintons_dirty_politics_bernie_sanders_is_experiencing_the_same_nasty_tricks_that_clintons_campaign_dealt_obama_in_2008/

http://savannahnow.com/opinion-opinion-columns/2016-10-25/cal-thomas-political-dirty-tricks-then-and-now

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/5-political-dirty-tricks-we-learned-from-the-robocalls-trial-1.2669924

https://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/2d0r1d/the_reactionary_political_debate_playbook_karl/

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/south-carolina-dirty-tricks-republicans-219116

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-10/yale-newspaper-publishes-guide-destroying-white-boy-lives-using-stasi-tactics

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/02/yale_editor_chillingly_urges_fellow_yalies_to_act_as_a_stasi_to_monitor_white_males.html

https://russia-insider.com/en/jeff-bezos-nudie-pics-be-released-cyber-tycoon-complains-about-loss-privacy/ri26224

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP5jqLAjbDw

** ‘They Can’t Beat Him On The Law So They Are Trying To Destroy His Life’ -Sen. Graham Questions Dems’ Motives On Brett Kavanaugh Sexual Assault Allegations (dailycaller.com)

** !!!!! Mueller Hears That Silicon Valley Has Been Manipulating The Entire BREXIT Campaign !!!!!! Second former employee of controversial data firm to be questioned by special counsel’s inquiry into Russia collusion. Per Carole Cadwalladr: Brittany Kaiser is said to be cooperating fully with the Mueller inquiry. A director of the controversial data company Cambridge Analytica, who appeared with Arron Banks at the launch of the Leave.EU campaign, has been subpoenaed by the US investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. A spokesman for Brittany Kaiser, former business development director for Cambridge Analytica – which collapsed after the Observer revealed details of its misuse of Facebook data – confirmed that she had been subpoenaed by special counsel Robert Mueller, and was cooperating fully with his investigation. He added that she was assisting other US congressional and legal investigations into the company’s activities and had voluntarily turned over documents and data.

Kaiser, who gave evidence to the UK parliament last April in which she claimed Cambridge Analytica had carried out in-depth work for Leave.EU, is the second individual connected to the firm subpoenaed by the special counsel. The Electoral Commission has said its investigation into Leave.EU found no evidence that the campaign “received donations or paid for services from Cambridge Analytica …beyond initial scoping work”. Damian Collins, chairman of parliament’s inquiry into fake news, said it was “no surprise” that Kaiser was under scrutiny by Mueller because “her work connected her to WikiLeaks, Cambridge Analytica and [its parent company] SCL, the Trump campaign, Leave.EU and Arron Banks”. He said it was now vital Britain had its own inquiry into foreign interference: “We should not be leaving this to the Americans.”

** CBS NEWS 60 MINUTES Lara Logan “I’m Being ‘Targeted’ . Per Tamar Auber: former CBS News foreign correspondent Lara Logan spoke with Fox News Sean Hannity about her recent comments slamming the media as “mostly liberal.” Logan told Breitbart podcaster Mike Ritland the remarks made on his show — which drew widespread attention online — amounted to “professional suicide.” Defending her remarks on Hannity’s show, Logan said that as the result of her speaking out about how the media is “mostly liberal” she has been targeted because she is an independent voice. “Any journalists who are not beating the same drum and giving the same talking points,” she insisted “pay the price” for not going along with the liberal crowd. She also called out her targeters by name.

“I know they’re going to come after me,” she told Hannity. “Michael Calderone who is at the Huffington Post. I can give you the script now. I can tell you who the players are. Joe Hagan. Brian Stelter.” She added: “They smear you personally. They go after your integrity. They go after your reputation as a person and a professional. They will stop at nothing. I am not the only one. And I am just, I am done, right, I am tired of it. And they do not get to write my story anymore. They don’t get to speak for me, I want to say loudly and clearly to anybody who is listening, I am not owned. Nobody owns me, right? I’m not owned by the left or the right.” Logan made headlines recently when, during a scorched earth podcast interview with Ritland, she said that there was a lot of “weight” in most news organizations on “one side of the political spectrum.” “The media everywhere is mostly liberal. But in this country, 85 percent of journalists are registered Democrats. So that’s just a fact, right?” she told Ritland. She also trashed reporting based on single, anonymous government sources. “That’s not journalism, that’s horseshit,” Logan stressed. “Responsibility for fake news begins with us. We bear some responsibility for that, and we’re not taking ownership of that and addressing it. We just want to blame it all on somebody else.”

** Internal documents from a private Israeli intelligence firm called Psy-Group show that, at the time of many incidents, the company, and possibly other private investigators, were targeting U.S. citizens because they spoke up about crimes. Psy-Group’s intelligence and influence operations, which included a failed attempt in the summer of 2017 to sway a local election in central California, were detailed in a New Yorker investigation that I co-wrote earlier this month. Before it went out of business (ie: changed it’s name) , last year, Psy-Group was part of a new wave of private-intelligence firms that recruited from the ranks of Israel’s secret services and described themselves as “private Mossads.” Psy-Group initially stood out among its rivals because it didn’t just gather intelligence; its operatives used false identities, or avatars, to covertly spread messages in an attempt to influence what people believed and how they behaved. In 2016, Psy-Group held discussions with the Trump campaign and others about conducting covert “influence” operations to benefit the candidate. Psy-Group’s founder and C.E.O., Royi Burstien, a veteran Israeli intelligence officer who established the firm in 2014, told me that his talks with the Trump campaign went nowhere. The company’s posturing, however, attracted the attention of Robert Mueller, the special counsel, who has been investigating interference in the 2016 Presidential race.’

** FED BOMBSHELL: Fusion GPS Bribed Dozens of MSM Journalists With Cash To Run Character Assassinations. High-ranking FBI insiders are pulling back the curtain on Fusion GPS, the firm that commissioned and spread the bogus Trump dossier. It appears the embattled intelligence firm was quite busy paying off Big Media reporters, according to federal sources who have traced dozens of transactions between TD Bank and media members as well as media organizations, sources confirm. But stunningly, Big Media organizations have employed Fusion GPS to dig dirt on politicians and D.C.’s elite — namely Donald Trump. “Fusion GPS was on the payroll of the media and in turn had members of the media on its payroll,” one FBI insider said. FBI insiders confirm Fusion GPS employed law firms as well as shell companies to send and receive funds to and from media and reporters. But the embattled firm also used its accounts at TD Bank to directly commission reporters. Likewise, Fusion GPS received funds from media companies into its own accounts at TD Bank, FBI insiders said, “There are dozens of payments from the media flowing into their (Fusion GPS’) account,” one federal law enforcement official said. “One company wired funds to Fusion (GPS) more than a dozen times.” Why would media companies commission Fusion GPS? Likely to dig dirt on enemies or secure records that reporters could not legally obtain, one federal law enforcement insider said. One FBI insider said the payments to Fusion GPS coincide with Donald Trump’s run for the White House. The payments were made between Sept. 2015 and Sept. 2017, records show. The unthinkable: The mainstream media paying Fusion GPS for dirt on Trump to the same firm the Democratic National Committee paid to fund the bogus Trump dossier. And at the same time Fusion GPS bribing journalists to place stories — likely negative about Trump, as well as spread the bogus Trump dossier around.

** Death By Metadata: Jeremy Scahill & Glenn Greenwald Reveal …

** New Snowden Doc Reveals How GCHQ/NSA Use The Internet To …

** Snowden Drip: Government Funded Character Assassination Squads Rampant Online

Case Update Cover Sheet

 

THIS IS OUR REPORT TO THE FBI AND CONGRESS, FILED GLOBALLY AND PUBLICLY, SO THAT NO PARTY CAN COVER THIS UP! CONGRESSIONAL OFFICIALS ARE FREE TO READ THE FBI FORM 302 REPORTS ON THIS CASE, THE SOLYNDRA CASE, CASE # 11-cv-2509 AND RELATED CASES AND CASE SUB-SET REPORTS.

(Revision # 268) THIS IS THE PUBLIC RECORD CASE TOP-SHEET OF THE CHARGES, AND ASSOCIATED EVIDENCE, WE HAVE FILED. AFTER BEING DAMAGED BY POLITICAL CORRUPTION, OUR TEAM SET OUT TO EXPOSE IT AND END IT…FOREVER!

———————————–

WE ARE DEMANDING: 1.) FEDERAL SPONSORSHIP OF OUR LITIGATION EFFORTS TO SUE EACH OF THE PARTIES INVOLVED IN THESE FRAUDS AGAINST CITIZENS AND THESE ATTACKS ON CITIZENS! 2.) A CONGRESSIONAL HEARING TO PRESENT OUR EVIDENCE TO THE PUBLIC AND CONGRESS. WE HAVE VAST, FBI-QUALITY, EVIDENCE; PREVIOUS CASE LAW ADVANTAGES AND CONGRESSIONAL EXPERT WITNESSES! DOJ AND CONGRESS: CONTACT US RE: CASE # XYZ2020A – YOU HAVE OUR NUMBER!

—————————————————————

SEE THE FEATURE FILM, FOR FREE, THAT REVEALS THE WHOLE STORY:

“OMERTA“

CLICK THIS LINK TO WATCH IT IN YOUR BROWSER:

OMERTA FINAL.m4v

Additional Links To View The Film For Free:

https://vimeo.com/452233943

http://testimony111.com/public/OMERTA_FINAL.m4v

…or most online streaming sites…

—————————————————————————————-

 

THE PUBLIC MUST CONTINUE TO TERMINATE THE FELONY ORGANIZED CRIME BY MAJOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND SILICON VALLEY OLIGARCH TECH MOBSTERS! PUBLICLY SHAME THEM! BOYCOTT THEIR COMPANIES! CRASH THEIR STOCK! DEMAND THEIR ARRESTS AND INDICTMENTS. MAKE IT ILLEGAL FOR POLITICIANS TO OWN STOCK BECAUSE THAT IS HOW BRIBES ARE NOW PAID!

STATE AND FEDERAL OFFICIALS DEFRAUDED CITIZENS OUT OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF THEIR LIFE-SAVINGS AND THEN ATTACKED THOSE TAXPAYERS FOR REPORTING THE CRIMES! THOSE OFFICIALS THEN PUT THE PROFITS AND STOCK MARKET FUNDS FROM THOSE CRIMES IN THEIR OWN, AND THEIR FAMILIES, CORRUPT MONOPOLY POCKETS!

IT SEEMS LIKE THE STONEWALLING NEVER ENDS. FAMOUS CALIFORNIA AND WASHINGTON DC POLITICIANS RAN THESE CRIMES ALONG WITH BIG TECH OLIGARCHS! HUGE COVER-UPS ARE UNDERWAY BUT THEY WILL NEVER BE ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH IT! THEY ARE BEING EXPOSED BY THESE CROWD-SOURCED INVESTIGATIONS THAT USE 100% LEGAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES !

HUGE NEWS: U.S. Government Proves That Rogue CIA And FBI Agents Exist And Use Government Agencies For Revenge Hit Jobs; Just As We Asserted When We Proved SSA, DOJ, DOE Agencies Found To Run Vendettas On Citizens Who Spoke Up About Corruption – Durham Case!

JEFFREY EPSTEIN IS DEAD, RAJ GUPTA HAS BEEN JAILED, STEVE RATTNER WAS INDICTED, JAMES BRONKEMA IS DEAD, ROGER BOAS IS DEAD….BUT THOSE WERE JUST THE TIP OF THE ICE-BERG. ERIC SCHMIDT, LARRY PAGE, ELON MUSK AND THEIR CROOKED SENATORS ARE STILL RUNNING AROUND DOING THE SAME OLD CRIMES AND CORRUPTION VIA THEIR NETWORK OF DIRTY TRICKS OPERATIVES…

In one of our whistle-blower complaints about State and Federal officials conduct in stimulus programs, we made repeated attempts to inform executive leadership and legal advisers about questionable activities of those officials. We have all of the needed additional evidence to back up our allegations against these officials as we reported to the Inspector General. Concerned parties have been blocked from reporting the activity to Offices of Legal Affairs, in violation of the law. In retribution, A number of parties had tax-payer financed revenge programs launched against them using State and Federal resources. We directly witnessed much of the behavior and reported it, personally, to the FBI at their offices. We have made top law enforcement and intelligence officials aware of these concerns on repeated occasions. To our knowledge, none of them ever took action to resolve the issues, and several of them specifically directed subordinate staff to continue facilitating questionable activities after the concerns were raised. We witnessed the concerning activities in Washington, D.C., New York, California and in activities with overseas parties.

White House Staff including Rahm Emanual, Bill Daley, Jay Carney, Robert Gibbs, Steve Rattner, David Axelrod, John Podesta, et al; and The Secretary of Energy Steven Chu and the Chief Counsel for the United States Department of Energy Daniel Cohen and Bill Cooper were, (from 2007 forward), either financed by, friends, with, sleeping with, dating the staff of, holding stock market assets in, promised a revolving door job or government service contracts from, partying with, personal friends with, photographed at private events with, exchanging emails with, business associates of or directed by; our business adversaries, or the Senators and Department of Energy politicians that those business adversaries pay campaign finances to, or supply political digital search manipulation services to. Criminal U.S. Senators coordinated and profited in these schemes. Their own family members have now supplied evidence against them. Nobody is allowed to “win” government funds unless they are friends and stock market partners with certain U.S. Senators. Even if your application metrics beat every single other competing Applicant, you will get lied to and defrauded by Department of Energy and White House officials. You will be told that you have a “fair chance“, but all of the money is secretly hard-wired to a business partner of a Pelosi or Feinstein and you will just waste your time, staff resources and payroll waiting for years on promised funds that will never come.

From 2007 forward, The White House and The Department Of Energy were controlled by the Silicon Valley tech oligarchs for monopolistic profiteering! (ie: You could not swing a cat in the Obama White House without hitting a Google executive or an ex-lover of Eric Schmidt) That is a violation of the law, the Constitution and the American Way. The named person’s we have presented to the FBI, DOJ, SEC and other agencies, engaged in crimes to personally profit in the stock market and political venues. At the same time they operated the command and control of millions of dollars of defamation, character assassination and black-list attacks against us for reporting their crimes. These perpetrators are now being exposed, arrested, indicted and drained of their ill-gotten profits. We are owed our damages compensation and we will not rest until we get it! Every member of the public is invited to help crowd-source the termination of these corrupt crooks.

PUBLIC OFFICIALS INSIDER-RIGGED THE TECH STOCK MARKET AND USED TAXPAYER MONEY TO PROFITEER AND VIOLATE ANTI-TRUST AND ‘RICO’ RACKETEERING LAWS. THEIR SECRET FAMILY BANKING AND COVERT SECURITIES ACCOUNT RECORDS PROVE IT!

THE DARK-MONEY SECRET CONDUITS HAVE NOW BEEN EXPOSED! OUR COMPETITORS FILLED GOVERNMENT OFFICES WITH THEIR STAFF THEN BLACK-LISTED US AND GAVE OUR MONEY TO THEMSELVES AND THE SENATORS WHO OWNED THEIR STOCK!!!! SEE THIS REPORT TO CONGRESS:
How Google Controls Government Policy And Process In America FREE.pdf

DEAR FBI: “CALIFORNIA POLITICIANS USE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TO ENRICH THEIR OWN FAMILIES. THEY PUT TAX MONEY IN THEIR POCKETS, SKIM GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS, ENGAGE IN MONEY-LAUNDERING, SEX CULTS AND THE PURCHASE OF PROSTITUTES, RIG THE STOCK MARKET, TAKE BRIBES FROM SILICON VALLEY OLIGARCHS AND ATTACK CITIZENS AT THE EXPENSE OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY! GOGGLE HAS BRIBED EVERY POLITICIAN; HOW DO THEY GET AWAY WITH SUCH CORRUPTION?…”

“BILL COOPER – PAY US OUR DAMAGES, NOW! IT IS A THOUSAND TIMES LESS EXPENSIVE FOR YOU TO PAY OUR DAMAGES NOW, THAN FOR YOU TO WASTE TAXPAYER TIME AND MONEY ON MORE STONE-WALLING…”

The Silicon Valley High-Tech Black-Listing Antitrust Litigation And Big Tech’s Attacks On Democracy

“…Who are the criminal mobsters of Silicon Valley’s democracy manipulation millionaires and billionaires known as “The Commission” (Also known as “The Paypal Mafia“, The “Deep State“, “The Silicon Valley Cartel“)? Who are the elitist tax evader, sex freak, money-laundering, black-list operating, Senator bribing, off-shore cash hiding, election rigging insiders who manipulate the system for their own insider trading schemes: Reid Hoffman, Larry Page, Sergy Brin, Elon Musk, Dustin Moskovitz, Mark Zuckerberg, Eric Schmidt, Laurene Powell Jobs, Steve Spinner, Steve Westly, Vinod Khosla, Andy Bechtolsheim, Brian Goncher, Cheryl Sandberg, David Drummond, Andy Rubin, David Plouffe, Tim Draper, Jeffrey Epstein, Gilman Louie, Ira Ehrenpreis, Tim Cook, McKinsey Consulting, Deloitte, Goldman Sachs, Jerry Brown, Richard Blum, James Breyer, John Podesta, Joe Lonsdale, John Doerr, Keith Rabois, Marc Andreesen, George Soros, Mario Rosatti, Martin LaGod, Michael Moritz, Viktor Vekselberg, Larry Summers, Pierre Omidyar, Tom Steyer, Steve Jurvetson, Steve Rattner and their CARTEL including their crooked lawyers and lobbyist mobs! They have “command and control and exclusive-beneficiary positions in ongoing, coordinated, criminal and anti-trust activities involving government and stock market funds…”. Their crimes financially benefited Dianne Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi, Jerry Brown, Kamala Harris and Barack Obama and their stock market holdings, while harming their competitors on purpose. The securities and stock market records prove that it was crony corruption and payola. The sex crime victims of Cartel member Jeffrey Epstein reported him to the DOJ a decade ago, yet nothing was done. We reported this Cartel in 2008, STILL, nothing has been done! These people have run a stock market and government funding State and Federal PONZI SCHEME in every “stimulus” from 2008 forward! They use free government money, stock valuation pump-and-dump and black-lists to make certain that no competitor can ever operate against them in any market. The more that the California Senators get to control Congress, the more they get to push laws that benefit companies owned by their spouses! By filling California up with illegal immigrants, enticed by the offer of “free stuff”, Dianne and Nancy get to control federal policy by manipulating the census numbers. By controlling government decisions, Nancy and Dianne get to give taxpayer money to their friends (Elon Musk, Eric Schmidt, Mark Zuckerberg, etc, who they own stock with) and deny that money to their competitors. They have a covert news and media network that hides all news coverage about the crimes. Illegal immigrants equal control of the stock market profits for Nancy’s, Kamala’s and Dianne’s investment banker husbands. It is as simple as that!…”

HOW THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND CALIFORNIA SENATORS CREATED THE LARGEST INSIDER TRADING SCHEME IN HISTORY

Companies in PR-hype industries sometimes have a history of reinventing themselves. For Tesla Motors and Solyndra the potential transition from start-up to future energy monopoly was being facilitated by the government. Now Kodak has copied this corruption scam. The U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) signed a letter of interest to provide hundreds of millions in favored-nation ‘loans’ to them to support the company’s plans to produce green energy things for the U.S. domestic market. Thereafter, a series of ensuing events raised concerns about potentially illegal insider trading, and of an uneven level playing field for investors in U.S. stock markets. The immediate response by U.S. Congress was to investigate. The new KODAK Covid loan is the same kind of crime, which insiders learned they could get away with in the Obama U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY.

Whether the suspicious trading activity is a case of illegal insider trading activity is difficult to judge without further scrutiny by prosecutors. However, these new types of substantial loans from the government to private companies give rise to a new type of private information. While traditional corporate events, such as earnings announcements or corporate takeovers, are subject to strict rules about the disclosure of information and reporting requirements, it appears that the disbursement of government subsidies and grants falls into a grey area not effectively covered by existing rules. Thus, it is necessary to consider more transparent and consistent protocols on information disclosure to avoid providing unfair advantages to a select group of company insiders including California Senators and Energy Department staff.

Just one day before the official announcement of the loan, on July 27, Kodak’s stock price jumped by about 25 percent on a trading volume of 1,645,719 shares, over five times the average daily trading volume in prior months. These unusual trading activities were likely attributable to the premature release of the news by several media outlets.

Unusual trading activity also occurred in Kodak’s stock options, even prior to the news leakage. The trading volume was especially strong in out-of-the-money (OTM) call options, which are set to profit especially from a positive jump in stock prices, with daily trading volumes of all OTM call options on July 17, 20 and 27 that was more than ten times larger than average volumes since the beginning of 2020.

Kodak’s executives and board members are also linked to controversial transactions. About one month before the announcement, on June 23, the company’s executive chair and a director purchased over 50,000 shares of the company’s stock a day during the time when the company was negotiating loans with the government. In addition, four executives were granted stock options right on July 27, just one day before the stock price skyrocketed. Prior to another major stock price drop, due to a freezing of the Kodak loan associated with the congressional investigation, a board member donated $116 million in company shares, entitling the donors to a substantial tax deduction.

These events have alerted legislators and raised concerns that trades of investors may explain the suspicious activity with access to material non-public information. On August 3, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) formally requested the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to investigate the possibility of insider trading and violation of regulatory compliance rules. Two House committee chairs also launched their own inquiries, requesting detailed records from the loan provider, DFC.

Besides these valid outcries due to concerns about the potential for illegal insider trading, this turn of events raises a question of broad public interest.  Why was the usual protocol for the enforcement of news disclosure and insider trading regulations around corporate events not followed in this case? The announcement of the government-sponsored Kodak loan is no different from traditional corporate events, such as earnings disclosures, announcements of mergers and acquisitions, spinoffs, or new product announcements. It also involves secret negotiations in executive offices that give rise to the potential for trading on privileged information.

In the Kodak case, the private information was indeed material. The $765 million government loan it received amounts to 54 percent of the company’s total assets, 78 percent of its annual revenue, and is 64 times larger than its annual operating cash flows, according to its most recent 10-K filing. It is not surprising that such news boosted the stock price from about $2 to $60 in a matter of days. Another related issue is that the DFC and Kodak did not release the news at the same time. This lack of consistency in information disclosure makes it difficult to pinpoint when the information was publicly available.

The Kodak experience was not unique. The massive monetary and fiscal interventions that have been announced in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere are likely to lead to similar types of sensitive news releases. The difference with respect to more traditional corporate announcements is that the government has a seat at the table. U.S. officials and their counterparts elsewhere are picking winners and losers in the disbursal of grants, loans and contracts. Thus, a new source of privileged information has emerged that raises the possibility that insiders may well profit from possession of such information before it is released to the market.

In the Department of Energy Cleantech Crash political payola quid pro quo, government money was used by Goldman Sachs and their clients for the following scams, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF WHICH was used in the Dept of Energy ATVM AND LGP funds manipulations. Every One of these financial scam tricks is used daily by the suspects in this case:

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Pools“

Agreements, often written, among a group of traders to delegate authority to a single manager to trade in a specific stock for a specific period of time and then to share in the resulting profits or losses.”[5] In Australia section 1041B prohibits pooling.

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Churning“

When a trader places both buy and sell orders at about the same price. The increase in activity is intended to attract additional investors, and increase the price.

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Stock bashing“

This scheme is usually orchestrated by savvy online message board posters (a.k.a. “Bashers”) who make up false and/or misleading information about the target company in an attempt to get shares for a cheaper price. This activity, in most cases, is conducted by posting libelous posts on multiple public forums. The perpetrators sometimes work directly for unscrupulous Investor Relations firms who have convertible notes that convert for more shares the lower the bid or ask price is; thus the lower these Bashers can drive a stock price down by trying to convince shareholders they have bought a worthless security, the more shares the Investor Relations firm receives as compensation. Immediately after the stock conversion is complete and shares are issued to the Investor Relations firm, consultant, attorney or similar party, the basher/s then become friends of the company and move quickly to ensure they profit on a classic Pump & Dump scheme to liquidate their ill-gotten shares. (see P&D)

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Pump and dump“

A pump and dump scheme is generally part of a more complex grand plan of market manipulation on the targeted security. The Perpetrators (Usually stock promoters) convince company affiliates and large position non-affiliates to release shares into a free trading status as “Payment” for services for promoting the security. Instead of putting out legitimate information about a company the promoter sends out bogus e-mails (the “Pump”) to millions of unsophisticated investors (Sometimes called “Retail Investors”) in an attempt to drive the price of the stock and volume to higher points. After they accomplish both, the promoter sells their shares (the “Dump”) and the stock price falls, taking all the duped investors’ money with it.

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Runs“

When a group of traders create activity or rumours in order to drive the price of a security up. An example is the Guinness share-trading fraud of the 1980s. In the US, this activity is usually referred to as painting the tape.[6] Runs may also occur when trader(s) are attempting to drive the price of a certain share down, although this is rare. (see Stock Bashing)

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Ramping (the market)“

Actions designed to artificially raise the market price of listed securities and give the impression of voluminous trading in order to make a quick profit.[7]

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Wash trade“

In a wash trade the manipulator sells and repurchases the same or substantially the same security for the purpose of generating activity and increasing the price.

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Bear raid“

In a bear raid there is an attempt to push the price of a stock down by heavy selling or short selling.[8]

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Lure and Squeeze“

This works with a company that is very distressed on paper, with impossibly high debt, consistently high annual losses but very few assets, making it look as if bankruptcy must be imminent. The stock price gradually falls as people new to the stock short it on the basis of the poor outlook for the company, until the number of shorted shares greatly exceeds the total number of shares that are not held by those aware of the lure and squeeze scheme (call them “people in the know”). In the meantime, people in the know increasingly purchase the stock as it drops to lower and lower prices. When the short interest has reached a maximum, the company announces it has made a deal with its creditors to settle its loans in exchange for shares of stock (or some similar kind of arrangement that leverages the stock price to benefit the company), knowing that those who have short positions will be squeezed as the price of the stock sky-rockets. Near its peak price, people in the know start to sell, and the price gradually falls back down again for the cycle to repeat.

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Quote stuffing“

Quote stuffing is made possible by high-frequency trading programs that can execute market actions with incredible speed. However, high-frequency trading in and of itself is not illegal. The tactic involves using specialized, high-bandwidth hardware to quickly enter and withdraw large quantities of orders in an attempt to flood the market, thereby gaining an advantage over slower market participants.[9]

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Cross-Product Manipulation“

A type of manipulation possible when financial instruments are settled based on benchmarks set by the trading of physical commodities, for example in United States Natural Gas Markets. The manipulator takes a large long (short) financial position that will benefit from the benchmark settling at a higher (lower) price, then trades in the physical commodity markets at such a large volume as to influence the benchmark price in the direction that will benefit their financial position.

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Spoofing (finance)“

Spoofing is a disruptive algorithmic trading entity employed by traders to outpace other market participants and to manipulate commodity markets. Spoofers feign interest in trading futures, stocks and other products in financial markets creating an illusion of exchange pessimism in the futures market when many offers are being cancelled or withdrawn, or false optimism or demand when many offers are being placed in bad faith. Spoofers bid or offer with intent to cancel before the orders are filled. The flurry of activity around the buy or sell orders is intended to attract other high-frequency traders (HFT) to induce a particular market reaction such as manipulating the market price of a security. Spoofing can be a factor in the rise and fall of the price of shares and can be very profitable to the spoofer who can time buying and selling based on this manipulation.

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Price-Fixing“

A very simple type of fraud where the principles who publish a price or indicator conspire to set it falsely and benefit their own interests. The Libor scandal for example, involved bankers setting the Libor rate to benefit their trader’s portfolios or to make certain entities appear more creditworthy than they were.

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “High Closing (finance)“

High closing is an attempt to manipulate the price of a security at the end of trading day to ensure that it closes higher than it should. This is usually achieved by putting in manipulative trades close to closing.

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “Cornering the market“

In cornering the market the manipulators buy sufficiently large amount of a commodity so they can control the price creating in effect a monopoly. For example, the brothers Nelson Bunker Hunt and William Herbert Hunt attempted to corner the world silver markets in the late 1970s and early 1980s, at one stage holding the rights to more than half of the world’s deliverable silver.[10] During the Hunts’ accumulation of the precious metal, silver prices rose from $11 an ounce in September 1979 to nearly $50 an ounce in January 1980.[11] Silver prices ultimately collapsed to below $11 an ounce two months later,[11] much of the fall occurring on a single day now known as Silver Thursday, due to changes made to exchange rules regarding the purchase of commodities on margin.[12]

** The Silicon Valley Stock Scam Called: “The Conduit Double Blind“

In this scam, government money is given to a Tesla, Solyndra, etc. who then money launder the cash through executive-held 501 c3 and c4 charities; and company assets and then provide DARK MONEY cash and services to political campaigns like Obama and Clinton election funds. In the case of Tesla, Google (an investor and boyfriend of Musk) supplied billions of dollars of web search rigging. Stock ownership in the companies and deals is traded for campaign funds. David Brock is a master of this kind of Dark Money money-laundering for political campaigns using PACS and pass-through spoofing.

Tesla and Solyndra investors have used ALL of the above tactics and more. Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan have thousands of staff who PROVIDE these stock market manipulation tricks to people like Elon Musk, Larry Page, Eric Schmidt, et al. These kinds of financial crimes and corruption account for the manipulation of over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS of ill-gotten profits annually!

Given the massive stimulus packages that are in force today and expected to be implemented going forward, regulators need to set clear guidelines for how and when such privileged information can be disclosed, and impose rigorous trading restrictions for investors with access to private information. Failure to do so always gives unfair advantage to some and damages the level playing field in financial markets.

To avoid providing such unfair advantage to selected executives, the SEC and the Department of Justice need to develop new procedures to incorporate potential illegal transactions derived from information about government intervention through diverse channels. We advocate for a more transparent and consistent protocol on information disclosure regarding government’s loan programs to prevent similar events from recurring. For example, the government could channel the release of news about COVID-19-related stimulus interventions through a common platform to prevent leakage from diverse sources and reduce information asymmetry among investors.

The DFC loan to Kodak is the first of its kind under the Defense Production Act but not the first ever because DOE already created the pump-and-dump scheme for tech oligarchs. Nobody should be surprised by Kodak trying a proven corruption scam. Since we are in unprecedented times, government agencies and regulators need to make changes to adapt to the current situation and fulfill their mission to ensure a level playing field for investors even during this difficult period. Regulation never happens in theses scams because most California Senators and their families profit from these crimes and corruption.

The indisputable facts here are the assertions that the Silicon Valley oligarchs:

1. Control business and politics like a crime Cartel, and…

2. Are a white male fraternity who attack outsiders in organized and group-planned manners, and…

3. Come from dynastic families that systematically ran them through Stanford, Harvard and Yale men’s clubs, and…

4. Were socially trained and programmed to operate in a closed, tribal, exclusionary manner, and…

5. Operated the “Angelgate” collusion scandal, the “Solyndra Scandal”, etc., and…

6. Operated the “Silicon Valley High Tech Employee Collusion” for which they were sued in a famous class-action case, and…

7. Controlled the Obama Administration and the Obama White House and traded most key staff, back-and-forth, with that Administration, and…

8. Have been sued, indicted and charged in divorce proceedings with an unusually massive amount of sex trafficking matters, and…

9. Use the same 10 law-firms who have been charged with public policy manipulation, bribery and lobbying, and…

10. Control internet news, media and information, and…

11. “Own” certain U.S. Senators by virtue of direct bribe payments and securities/stock payola payments, and…

12. Use a variety of tools like GUST, Private Google Docs sites, covert Facebook pages and similar, to secretly conspire and plan collusion and organized monopolistic practices, and…

13. Have their venture capitalists spy on entrepreneurs and copy their technology to be deployed by Google, or Facebook under a new name, and…

14. Have over 150+ fake “charity” and hidden shell corporation entities that conduit money to political interests that promise to increase the oligarchs stock market valuations, and…

15. Are financing and using Jeffrey Epstein’s, NXVIUM and many other underage sex cult’s, and…

16. Are an interstate Mafia-like criminal organization operating in violation of felony-class organized crime laws, and…

17. Have hired the largest number of K Street and Sacramento lobbyists and political manipulators in history, and…

18. Are connected to multiple suspicious deaths from Seth Rich, to Gary Conley, to Rajeev Motwani, and many more, and…

19. Have had their secret files hacked by the Feds and Chinese and Russian hackers (offered for sale on the Dark Web), and…

Proof-1: One Set Of Evidence Proving The Assertions

Proof-2: A Different Evidence Set Repository

Reports: Documents Provided To Law Enforcement And Regulatory Agencies

Videos: Broadcast News Video Evidence Proving The Assertions

Photos, Memes And News Clippings About The Incident

Submitted To Congressional Investigators

More News Videos Proving The Assertions Of Organized Crime And Corruption

The Perps – Who Ran These Crimes? THESE ARE THEIR NAMES!

 

SPECIAL EVIDENCE SETS:

Inside The Google Empire
Dirty Secrets Of A Clean Car
How Silicon Valley Rips Off Inventors
Meet Some Of Our Investigators
The Mobsters of Tech
Investigating Political Corruption
Who Does Your Senator Hire To Put Hit Jobs On Political Opposition?
Reports On The Corruption

READ THE REPORT: HOW TO END POLITICAL CORRUPTION FOREVER

PLEASE SHARE THIS REPORT WITH ANY PUBLIC OFFICIALS YOU MAY BE ABLE TO CONNECT WITH VIA THIS LINK: http://testimony111.com/public/THE_CHARGES.pdf

WE HAVE SENT OVER 100 LETTERS TO THE BIGGEST LAW ENFORCEMENT AND REGULATORY AGENCIES IN AMERICA (AND THE TOP POLITICIANS) REPORTING THESE CRIMES. WE KEPT THEIR RESPONSES AND WE ARE REPORTING THOSE THAT RUN COVER-UPS, STONEWALLS, FINGER-POINTING AND BS CAMPAIGNS! NOW WE ARE DELIVERING THIS REPORT TO EVERY CITIZEN IN AMERICA VIA NOVEL TECHNOLOGIES!

————————————————————–

Court Statement By One Of Many Victims: “… We were attacked with a $30 million dollar+ retribution/political-reprisal/revenge hatchet-job program contracted by White House and Department of Energy political operatives, their appointees and staffing. We have sourced the payment records evidence to prove it. Those public officials illegally used taxpayer-financed government funds and they were also business competitors of my peers and I. They are mad because they got caught doing crimes with taxpayer funds…There is, now, no legal or historical-fact question about the veracity of the proof that public officials put “hit-jobs” on reporters, whistle-blowers or competitors using government resources to do so. In fact, today, the U.S. Congress is spending nearly a third of it’s time on the question of agencies being used as reprisal operations….famous senators, their Silicon Valley oligarch financiers and their associates run a felony-class organized crime insider-trading scam that abuses taxpayers and sabotages competing businesses at the expense of the public treasuries…IMAGINE LIVING IN A WORLD WHERE ALMOST EVERY ONE OF THE PUBLIC OFFICIALS THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO HELP YOU TURNED OUT TO BE YOUR BUSINESS COMPETITORS. IMAGINE HAVING THEM USE GOVERNMENT RESOURCES TO PROFIT AT YOUR EXPENSE, BLOCKADE YOU AND TREAT DEMOCRACY LIKE A GARAGE SALE!

This is about a group of U.S. Senators, Silicon Valley Oligarchs, Detroit Oligarchs, Crooked Law Firms and Lobbyists who commit crimes in order to manipulate over a trillion tax dollars into their, and their friends pockets. They use media monopoly tricks to try to shut out any other viewpoints. They push manufactured “emotional trigger” issues that they believe will get more tax money allocated to “issue solutions” that they, and their friends, happen to already own the monopolies for. They are felons yet they control some of the offices of the agencies who are supposed to arrest them. Silicon Valley bought K Street lobby firms and U.S. Senators, gave them more ‘Dark Money’ than history has ever seen and then had giant tech-law firms bribe, hit-job and blockade any attempts to arrest them…The U.S. Government hired us, paid us part of our money, then asked us to spend OUR life savings and years of our time on THEIR federal project based on their lies and false-promises. Then they took the assets we were asked to invest, plus the money they owed us, and gave it to their friends. When we complained to the FBI, Congress and the SEC, they hired Fusion GPS-like companies to run “hit-jobs” on us and threaten our lives.

WE WERE LIED TO AND DEFRAUDED BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. THEY TOOK OUR MONEY AND USED US, AND OUR PEERS, AS A SMOKE-SCREEN TO HIDE THEIR CRONY PAYOLA CRIME THAT PUT TAXPAYER CASH IN THEIR FRIEND’S POCKETS…We have received ZERO justice and ZERO compensation for our damages, our time, our witness testimony and our help provided to the authorities! We demand our compensation from the State And Federal authorities! Neither I, our peers or the voters will ever let this go until we receive justice!…”

—————————————————-

KEY POINTS OF NOTE:

– THESE JEFFREY EPSTEIN-like CROOKS INCLUDE SENATORS, TECHNOLOGY CEO’S AND FAMOUS SAND HILL ROAD VENTURE CAPITALISTS. THOSE SUSPECTS HAVE ENGAGED IN THE LARGEST SETS OF BRIBES IN U.S. HISTORY! DON’T LET THESE SILICON VALLEY SEX-TRAFFICKING, BRIBING, RACIST, MISOGYNIST, TAX-EVADING, MONEY-LAUNDERING, BLACK-LISTING, FELONY CRIMINALS GET AWAY WITH IT!

– The Flynn Case, The Strzok Case, The Solyndra Case, The GOOGLE Corruption Cases, The 200+ Silicon Valley Cases and MORE, prove that White House officials weaponized federal intelligence and services staff and used federal agencies to put hit-jobs on citizens, as anti-trust violating reprisal/revenge vendettas, on orders from their Silicon Valley campaign financiers. Billionaires and their companies like Tesla, Google, Facebook, Solyndra, Netflix, etc., got kick-backs, government contracts, monopolies and tax evasion perks for their quid-pro-quo! In the current and previous “emergency stimulus bills”, under the guise of “it’s an emergency, give us all the money”, Congressional leaders took taxpayer funds and put the money and stock market perks in their family bank accounts, while sabotaging their business competitors. THE U.S. CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS HAVE PROVEN IT!

– “We witnessed a series of felony corruption crimes, mind numbing cronyism, and political payola using insider trading and we reported those crimes. In exchange we got hit-jobs, cover-ups, de-funding, rights-blockades, harassment and ZERO JUSTICE from public officials!”

– News reports have now revealed that the Silicon Valley oligarchs are funding and creating the BLM riots and street ruckus in order to get even more political donations for election manipulations. These are the same Stanford elitists that ran the Cleantech Crash scam. They don’t care about the environment, racism or anything but their stock market accounts. They only care about killing off their competitors and they use “green-washing” to cover their crimes. You can find a list of their names at the bottom of this document. They have thousands of operatives like Steve Spinner, David Plouffe, Sid Blumenthal, Nick Denton, etc. that launder hundreds of millions of dollars through a vast number of PAC’s and fake ‘charities’. This mob had the idea to: “CONTROL ALL INFORMATION AND MANIPULATE POLITICS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS“

– Public forensic investigations are bringing hell to every big tech crook involved in this scheme, for the rest of their lives, until they are brought to justice. These crooks are now under surveillance and investigation by the public, and they are being exposed, doxed, reported and FBI-charged. Disclosure dossiers have been produced on every single one of the top 200 culprits! Global citizen social media and news out-reach programs contact hundreds of thousands of voters per day. By the time the next elections get here, EVERYBODY will know about this corruption and EACH of the perpetrators by name! If you have a computer YOU have the tools to investigate them just like the FBI does.

– We saw criminal actions including bribes, insider trading, etc., that our politicians engaged in, and got no help, no responses and no provision of our Constitutional rights so we are forced to rely on citizen crowd-sourcing of investigations and mass social media out-reach for justice!

– The 2008 Department of Energy Cleantech Crash proves that a federal agency was used as just one big slush-fund to pay-off political campaign financiers, operate insider-trading stocks and sabotage those financiers competitors using taxpayer-financed resources! We have used private investigator, FBI resources and deep AI research to reveal that all government staff working on our application were getting quid-pro-quo…they were on the take. (Can anyone point out to us EVEN ONE person who was in the DOE/White House loop who was not working for, invested in, getting a future job from or other wise conflicted?) What do you do when The U.S. Government convinces you to invest millions of dollars, and your life, into one of their projects. Then their project turns out to be a scam where they had covertly hard-wired the upside to a couple of Senator’s and their campaign financier friends. The fix was in and the game was rigged to use a government program as a slush-fund for friends-with-benefits. We, and the public, got defrauded. Now the damages must be paid for, one way, or another. Every one of the insiders who did get government funding got it in the exact same size and order as their covert political campaign funding and stock market bribes to the deciders. Chamath Palihapitiya and other Silicon Valley insiders have now exposed the fact that Greylock, Kleiner, etc. are just a VC Ponzi Scheme! in this whole mess.

– Elon Musk got government money by bribing public officials and stacking hundreds of his friends and shareholders, ie: Steven Chu, Matt Rogers, Steve Westly, Steve Spinner’s ‘special friend’, investor Google’s employees, etc. on the staff of the Department of Energy and in the White House. In other words, hundreds of Elon Musk’s friends and financiers from Silicon Valley (Mostly from his investor: Google) were placed in the very offices that decided if he got the government funds. We have FBI-class records, financial tracking, emails, stock market relay records and other forensic data that proves it. We can swear, warrant, certify and prove these assertions in front of Congress in a live Congressional hearing or Civil Jury trial, given non-compromised legal backing. Musk bribed Senators, bought a President and had his buddies take over most of the Department of Energy. Lithium metals, and other rare earth mining materials, are monopolized by Elon Musk and his Silicon Valley Cartel, in rare-earth corrupt mining scams. Lithium’s widespread use in cars is hindered by a challenging obstacle: upon multiple charge-discharge cycles, fractal filaments called dendrites always grow through the electrolyte from the negative to the positive electrode and short-circuit the battery from the inside, thus guaranteeing that Tesla Cars will eventually all explode. Musk and Panasonic have known this since 2007 (They are “dumping” the batteries via Tesla) and have paid U.S. Senators, who own stock in Tesla, to cover it up. The lithium fires and toxic vapors are a major safety concern because they have killed, poisoned and injured too many citizens. Musk gets away with his scams because he pays U.S. Senators bribes with stocks in his corporations and has a thousand crooked Goldman Sachs investment bankers selling his hair-brained schemes to your parents pension funds. Musk’s partners created the government policy to sell pretend air, known as carbon credits. He makes $200M per year selling this pretend air. It is like you getting paid to sell your farts based on the hope that you might eat some beans some day. Musk’s big bucks don’t come from selling cars but from government mooch schemes.

– We have formally asked the FBI and DOJ to investigate, engage in surveillance upon and interview attackers: Nicholas Guido Denton, John Hermann, Ian Fette, Adrian Covert, Patrick George, John Cook, Larry Page, Eric Schmidt, David Drummond, David Axelrod, David Plouffe, Lachlan Seward, Jay Carney, Robert Gibbs and their associates and determine how they were compensated for the attacks, who had command and control of their actions and who acted as a conduit for the funds. These people bribed government officials, sold our government and Democratic process like they were running a garage sale and used taxpayer-funded resources to attack anyone who reported the crimes involving their Tech Cartel! Their emails, text messages, stock market accounts, bank accounts, paypal accounts and social accounts prove what they were up to!

– Investigations have revealed that the White House and California Senators hired the character assassination and defamation attack services: Cardinal & Pine; Pacronym, Acronym;  The Americano; Investing in US; Shadow Inc; Courier Newsroom; IN-Q-Tel; Gawker Media; Jalopnik; Gizmodo Media; K2 Intelligence; WikiStrat; Podesta Group; Fusion GPS; Google; YouTube; Alphabet; Facebook; Twitter; Think Progress; Media Matters); Black Cube; Correct The Record; Orbis Business Intelligence, Undercover Global Ltd; Stratfor; Jigsaw; ShareBlue/Acronym; Versa LLC; American Ledger; Supermajority News; New Venture Fund; Sixteen Thirty Fund; Cambridge Analytica; Sid Blumenthal; States Newsroom; Hopewell Fund;  Open Society.; David Brock; AmpliFire News; American Bridge; Plouffe Consulting; Pantsuit Nation; MotiveAI; American Bridge 21st Century Foundation; Priorities USA; PR Firm Sunshine Sachs; The American Independent Foundation; Covington and Burling; Buzzfeed; The American Independent; Perkins Coie, Wilson Sonsini and thousands more to run hit-jobs, character assassinations, dirty tricks and economic reprisal attacks on any applicants who reported the crimes. Each of those companies are now under federal and civil investigation. Most of these businesses offer the service of manipulating elections and news coverage in order to steer stock market profits into the pockets of billionaire clients at the expense of the taxpayer and Democracy. They hide their transactions via money-laundering. All of these services, when focused on individual citizens, are lethal.

 

——————————————————

To William Barr, Attorney General For The United States Of America:

 

“….We filed a federal Tort Claim ‘Form 95’ for damages and were informed by federal insiders that the claim was being stone-walled. We need to take deeper legal action against the government entities that caused the damages. Those damages are metricized in the seven to nine figures and proven by forensic data.

We, and our peers, have filed claims and reports with every law enforcement and regulatory entity we know of and testified for a number of them. My co-investors filed lawsuits and won in federal court on the proof that a government entity engaged in favoritism and quid-pro-quo but I have yet to receive any damages cash as I was an interested party in those other cases. My lawyer now works for you so he is conflicted out from helping us on this case any further.

After completing a federal contract, to perfection, to build America’s next generation energy and transportation technologies, our team were promised a factory contract, and funding, to deliver these low-cost, hyper-efficient, job-building, clean solutions to every American.

It turns out, we were lied to and defrauded. My associates found out that crooked politicians had secretly arranged to give our money and contracts to their best friends. That is a felony crime that abuses quite a few State and federal RICO, Anti-Trust laws, Quid-Pro-Quo laws, the public and the roots of Democracy..

We found out, thanks to FBI, OSC, GAO, OMB and private investigators, that the jurisdictional Senators and related politicians were engaged in corruption in partnership with a specific group of Silicon Valley tech oligarchs, now under investigation by various agencies of the U.S. Government.

Investigators have not found a single political entity in this case  who was not either: financed by, friends with, sleeping with, dating the staff of, holding stock market assets in, promised a revolving door job or government service contracts from, partying with, personal friends with, photographed at private events with, making profits by consulting for, exchanging emails with, business associates of or directed by; one of those business adversaries, or the Senators and politicians that those business adversaries pay campaign finances to, or supply political search engine manipulation services to.

In other words, the FBI found that the politicians that were supposed to represent and protect us were the owners, financiers and beneficiaries of our local and national competitors. We would be delighted to sit down with you at our regional FBI office to go over the connections and crimes with you and the senior FBI staff again.

We were lied to by government representatives who said we could make “hundreds of millions of dollars in sales profits and carbon credits sales” if we invested millions of dollars of our resources and years of our lives in America. We were induced to invest. We invested, but those representatives secretly knew they had already hard-wired the funds to our competitors. Our competitors made hundreds of millions of dollars at our expense!

Those “representatives” were Senators and government agency bosses who were financed by, friends with, sleeping with, dating the staff of, holding stock market assets in, promised a revolving door job or government service contracts from, partying with, personal friends with, photographed at private events with, making profits by consulting for, exchanging emails with, business associates of or directed by; one of those business adversaries, or the Senators and politicians that those business adversaries pay campaign finances to, or supply political search engine manipulation services to.

Our product and services metrics beat those of every other competitor. We won on every comparison item except we refused to pay the bribes and cooperate with the illegal quid-pro-quo demands.

We found that mega-insider law firms operate a cartel of political appointee placements via quid-pro-quo deals, black-lists and manipulation of public policy and policy decisions via covert perks and payola schemes.

We found out how insider stock trading between politicians and tech companies is the largest form of corruption in America.

We found out who the top 200 dirty politicians, corrupt investment bankers and tech oligarchs were that operated the scheme. We found out thanks to some FBI, GAO, Congressional and Media investigators. The evidence and financial tracking software proves it. The quid-pro-quo tracks back to each and every one of their stock market, i-bank and estate accounts.

Our issues are headline news every day. Nobody can doubt the veracity of our claims since they read about the exact same things in the news every morning.

How might you help me, personally, recover my monies for the damages from fraud, interference and other losses?…”

—————————————————–

SEE “THE BASICS” SECTION, AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS REPORT, FOR A CAPSULE EXPLANATION!

Amy Lambert, Google’s associate general counsel, noted in a blog post shortly after the DOJ’s actions, that Google’s definition of cold calling does not necessarily eliminate recruiting by letter or email, but only the process of calling on the telephone. By implication, recruiting through LinkedIn incurs recruiting by “InMail” – LinkedIn’s own mail contact system: “In order to maintain a good working relationship with these companies, in 2005 we decided not to “cold call” employees at a few of our partner companies. Our policy only impacted cold calling, and we continued to recruit from these companies through LinkedIn, job fairs, employee referrals, or when candidates approached Google directly. In fact, we hired hundreds of employees from the companies involved during this time period.”

The challenged “no cold call” agreements are alleged bilateral agreements between high technology companies not to cold call each other’s employees. The DOJ alleges that senior executives at each company negotiated to have their employees added to ‘no call’ lists maintained by human resources personnel or in company hiring manuals. The alleged agreements were not limited by geography, job function, product group, or time period. The alleged bilateral agreements were between: (1) Apple and Google, (2) Apple and Adobe, (3) Apple and Pixar, (4) Google and Intel, (5) Google and Intuit,[4] and (6) Lucasfilm and Pixar.[5]

The civil class action further alleges that agreements also existed to (1) “provide notification when making an offer to another [company]’s employee (without the knowledge or consent of the employee)” and (2) “agreements that, when offering a position to another company’s employee, neither company would counteroffer above the initial offer.”[3]

Department of Justice antitrust action

The United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division filed a complaint in the US District Court for the District of Columbia alleging violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. In US v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al., the Department of Justice alleged that Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, and Pixar had violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act by entering into a series of bilateral “No Cold Call” Agreements to prevent the recruitment of their employees (a similar but separate suit was filed against Lucasfilm on December 21, 2010[6]). The DOJ alleged in their Complaint that the companies had reached “facially anticompetitive” agreements that “eliminated a significant form of competition…to the detriment of the affected employees who were likely deprived of competitively important information and access to better job opportunities.” The DOJ also alleged that the agreements “were not ancillary to any legitimate collaboration,” “were much broader than reasonably necessary for the formation or implementation of any collaborative effort,” and “disrupted the normal price-setting mechanisms that apply in the labor setting.”[4] The same day it filed the suit, the DOJ and the defendants proposed a settlement.[7]

A final judgment enforcing the settlement was entered by the court on March 17, 2011.[8] Although the DOJ Complaint only challenged the alleged “no cold call” agreements, in the settlement, the companies agreed to a more broad prohibition against “attempting to enter into, entering into, maintaining or enforcing any agreement with any other person to in any way refrain from, requesting that any person in any way refrain from, or pressuring any person in any way to refrain from soliciting, cold calling, recruiting, or otherwise competing for employees of the other person”, for a period of five years; the court can grant an extension.[8] The settlement agreement does not provide any compensation for company employees affected by the alleged agreements.[9] Lucasfilm entered into a similar settlement agreement in December 2010.[5]

Civil class action

In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California 11-cv-2509 [10]) is a class-action lawsuit on behalf of over 64,000 employees of Adobe, Apple Inc., Google, Intel, Intuit, Pixar and Lucasfilm (the last two are subsidiaries of Disney) against their employer alleging that their wages were repressed due to alleged agreements between their employers not to hire employees from their competitors.[11][12] The case was filed on May 4, 2011 by a former software engineer at Lucasfilm and alleges violations of California’s antitrust statute, Business and Professions Code sections 16720 et seq. (the “Cartwright Act”); Business and Professions Code section 16600; and California’s unfair competition law, Business and Professions Code sections 17200, et seq. Focusing on the network of connections around former Apple CEO Steve Jobs, the Complaint alleges “an interconnected web of express agreements, each with the active involvement and participation of a company under the control of Steve Jobs…and/or a company that shared at least one member of Apple’s board of directors.” The alleged intent of this conspiracy was “to reduce employee compensation and mobility through eliminating competition for skilled labor.”[13]

On October 24, 2013 the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted class certification for all employees of Defendant companies from January 1, 2005 through January 1, 2010.[9]

As of October 31, 2013, Intuit, Pixar and Lucasfilm have reached a tentative settlement agreement. Pixar and Lucasfilm agreed to pay $9 million in damages, and Intuit agreed to pay $11 million in damages.[9] In May 2014, Judge Lucy Koh approved the $20 million settlement between Lucasfilm, Pixar, and Intuit and their employees. Class members in this settlement, which involved fewer than 8% of the 65,000 employees affected, will receive around $3,840 each.[14]

The trial of the class action for the remaining Defendant companies was scheduled to begin on May 27, 2014. The plaintiffs intended to ask the jury for $3 billion in compensation, a number which could in turn have tripled to $9 billion under antitrust law.[15] However, in late April 2014, the four remaining defendants, Apple Inc, Google, Intel and Adobe Systems, agreed to settle out of court. Any settlement must be approved by Judge Lucy Koh.[16][17]

On May 23, 2014, Apple, Google, Intel, Adobe agreed to settle for $324.5 million. Lawyers sought 25% in attorneys’ fees, plus expenses of as much as $1.2 million, according to the filing. Additional award payments of $80,000 would be sought for each named plaintiff who served as a class representative.[18] Payouts will average a few thousand dollars based on the salary of the employee at the time of the complaint.

In June 2014, Judge Lucy Koh expressed concern that the settlement may not be a good one for the plaintiffs. Michael Devine, one of the plaintiffs, said the settlement is unjust. In a letter he wrote to the judge he said the settlement represents only one-tenth of the $3 billion in compensation the 64,000 workers could have made if the defendants had not colluded.[19]

On August 8, 2014, Judge Koh rejected the settlement as insufficient on the basis of the evidence and exposure. Rejecting a settlement is unusual in such cases. This left the defendants with a choice between raising their settlement offer or facing a trial.[20]

On September 8, 2014, Judge Koh set April 9, 2015 as the actual trial date for the remaining defendants, with a pre-trial conference scheduled for December 19, 2014. Also, as of early September 2014, the defendants had re-entered mediation to determine whether a new settlement could be reached.[21]

A final approval hearing was held on July 9, 2015.[22] On Wednesday September 2, 2015, Judge Lucy H. Koh signed an order granting Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement. The settlement website stated that Adobe, Apple, Google, and Intel has reached a settlement of $415 million and other companies settled for $20 million.

According to the settlement website, Gilardi & Co., LLC distributed the settlement to class members the week of December 21, 2015.

See also

• Corrupt Eric Schmidt And His Role In The Illegal Collusion

• Antipoaching

 

In early 2005, as demand for Silicon Valley engineers began booming, Apple’s Steve Jobs sealed a secret and illegal pact with Google’s Eric Schmidt to artificially push their workers wages lower by agreeing not to recruit each other’s employees, sharing wage scale information, and punishing violators. On February 27, 2005, Bill Campbell, a member of Apple’s board of directors and senior advisor to Google, emailed Jobs to confirm that Eric Schmidt “got directly involved and firmly stopped all efforts to recruit anyone from Apple.”

Later that year, Schmidt instructed his Sr VP for Business Operation Shona Brown to keep the pact a secret and only share information “verbally, since I don’t want to create a paper trail over which we can be sued later?”

These secret conversations and agreements between some of the biggest names in Silicon Valley were first exposed in a Department of Justice antitrust investigation launched by the Obama Administration in 2010. That DOJ suit became the basis of a class action lawsuit filed on behalf of over 100,000 tech employees whose wages were artificially lowered — an estimated $9 billion effectively stolen by the high-flying companies from their workers to pad company earnings — in the second half of the 2000s. Last week, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denied attempts by Apple, Google, Intel, and Adobe to have the lawsuit tossed, and gave final approval for the class action suit to go forward. A jury trial date has been set for May 27 in San Jose, before US District Court judge Lucy Koh, who presided over the Samsung-Apple patent suit.

In a related but separate investigation and ongoing suit, eBay and its former CEO Meg Whitman, now CEO of HP, are being sued by both the federal government and the state of California for arranging a similar, secret wage-theft agreement with Intuit (and possibly Google as well) during the same period.

The secret wage-theft agreements between Apple, Google, Intel, Adobe, Intuit, and Pixar (now owned by Disney) are described in court papers obtained by PandoDaily as “an overarching conspiracy” in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Clayton Antitrust Act, and at times it reads like something lifted straight out of the robber baron era that produced those laws. Today’s inequality crisis is America’s worst on record since statistics were first recorded a hundred years ago — the only comparison would be to the era of the railroad tycoons in the late 19th century.

Shortly after sealing the pact with Google, Jobs strong-armed Adobe into joining after he complained to CEO Bruce Chizen that Adobe was recruiting Apple’s employees. Chizen sheepishly responded that he thought only a small class of employees were off-limits:

I thought we agreed not to recruit any senior level employees…. I would propose we keep it that way. Open to discuss. It would be good to agree.

Jobs responded by threatening war:

OK, I’ll tell our recruiters they are free to approach any Adobe employee who is not a Sr. Director or VP. Am I understanding your position correctly?

Adobe’s Chizen immediately backed down:

I’d rather agree NOT to actively solicit any employee from either company…..If you are in agreement, I will let my folks know.

The next day, Chizen let his folks — Adobe’s VP of Human Resources — know that “we are not to solicit ANY Apple employees, and visa versa.” Chizen was worried that if he didn’t agree, Jobs would make Adobe pay:

if I tell Steve [Jobs] it’s open season (other than senior managers), he will deliberately poach Adobe just to prove a point. Knowing Steve, he will go after some of our top Mac talent…and he will do it in a way in which they will be enticed to come (extraordinary packages and Steve wooing).

Indeed Jobs even threatened war against Google early 2005 before their “gentlemen’s agreement,” telling Sergey Brin to back off recruiting Apple’s Safari team:

if you [Brin] hire a single one of these people that means war.

Brin immediately advised Google’s Executive Management Team to halt all recruiting of Apple employees until an agreement was discussed.

In the geopolitics of Silicon Valley tech power, Adobe was no match for a corporate superpower like Apple. Inequality of the sort we’re experiencing today affects everyone in ways we haven’t even thought of — whether it’s Jobs bullying slightly lesser executives into joining an illegal wage-theft pact, or the tens of thousands of workers whose wages were artificially lowered, transferred into higher corporate earnings, and higher compensations for those already richest and most powerful to begin with.

Over the next two years, as the tech industry entered another frothing bubble, the secret wage-theft pact which began with Apple, Google and Pixar expanded to include Intuit and Intel. The secret agreements were based on relationships, and those relationships were forged in Silicon Valley’s incestuous boards of directors, which in the past has been recognized mostly as a problem for shareholders and corporate governance advocates, rather than for the tens of thousands of employees whose wages and lives are viscerally affected by their clubby backroom deals. Intel CEO Paul Otellini joined Google’s board of directors in 2004, a part-time gig that netted Otellini $23 million in 2007, with tens of millions more in Google stock options still in his name — which worked out to $464,000 per Google board event if you only counted the stock options Otellini cashed out — dwarfing what Otellini made off his Intel stock options, despite spending most of his career with the company.

Meanwhile, Eric Schmidt served on Apple’s board of directors until 2009, when a DoJ antitrust investigation pushed him to resign. Intuit’s chairman at the time, Bill Campbell, also served on Apple’s board of directors, and as official advisor — “consigliere” — to Google chief Eric Schmidt, until he resigned from Google in 2010. Campbell, a celebrated figure (“a quasi-religious force for good in Silicon Valley”) played a key behind-the-scenes role connecting the various CEOs into the wage-theft pact. Steve Jobs, who took regular Sunday walks with Campbell near their Palo Alto homes, valued Campbell for his ability “to get A and B work out of people,” gushing that the conduit at the center of the $9 billion wage theft suit, “loves people, and he loves growing people.”

Indeed. Eric Schmidt has been, if anything, even more profuse in his praise of Campbell. Schmidt credits Campbell for structuring Google when Schmidt was brought on board in 2001:

His contribution to Google — it is literally not possible to overstate. He essentially architected the organizational structure.

Court documents show it was Campbell who first brought together Jobs and Schmidt to form the core of the Silicon Valley wage-theft pact. And Campbell’s name appears as the early conduit bringing Intel into the pact with Google:

Bill Campbell (Chairman of Intuit Board of Directors, Co-Lead Director of Apple, and advisor to Google) was also involved in the Google-Intel agreement, as reflected in an email exchange from 2006 in which Bill Campbell agreed with Jonathan Rosenberg (Google Advisor to the Office of CEO and former Senior Vice President of Product Management) that Google should call [Intel CEO] Paul Otellini before making an offer to an Intel employee, regardless of whether the Intel employee first approached Google.

Getting Google on board with the wage-theft pact was the key for Apple from the start — articles in the tech press in 2005 pointed at Google’s recruitment drive and incentives were the key reason why tech wages soared that year, at the highest rate in well over a decade.

Campbell helped bring in Google, Intel, and, in 2006, Campbell saw to it that Intuit — the company he chaired — also joined the pact.

From the peaks of Silicon Valley, Campbell’s interpersonal skills were magical and awe-inspiring, a crucial factor in creating so much unimaginable wealth for their companies and themselves. Jobs said of Campbell:

There is something deeply human about him.

And Schmidt swooned:

He is my closest confidant…because he is the definition of trust.

Things — and people — look very different when you’re down in the Valley. In the nearly 100-page court opinion issued last October by Judge Koh granting class status to the lawsuit, Campbell comes off as anything but mystical and “deeply human.” He comes off as a scheming consigliere carrying out some of the drearier tasks that the oligarchs he served were constitutionally not so capable of arranging without him.

But the realities of inequality and capitalism invariably lead to mysticism of this sort, a natural human response to the dreary realities of concentrating so much wealth and power in the hands of a dozen interlocking board members at the expense of 100,000 employees, and so many other negative knock-off effects on the politics and culture of the world they dominate.

One of the more telling elements to this lawsuit is the role played by “Star Wars” creator George Lucas, who emerges as the Obi-Wan Kenobi of the wage-theft scheme. It’s almost too perfectly symbolic that Lucas — the symbiosis of Baby Boomer New Age mysticism, Left Coast power, political infantilism, and dreary 19th century labor exploitation — should be responsible for dreaming up the wage theft scheme back in the mid-1980s, when Lucas sold the computer animation division of Lucasfilm, Pixar, to Steve Jobs.

As Pixar went independent in 1986, Lucas explained his philosophy about how competition for computer engineers violated his sense of normalcy — and profit margins. According to court documents:

George Lucas believed that companies should not compete against each other for employees, because ‘[i]t’s not normal industrial competitive situation.’ As George Lucas explained, ‘I always — the rule we had, or the rule that I put down for everybody,’ was that ‘we cannot get into a bidding war with other companies because we don’t have the margins for that sort of thing.’

Translated, Lucas’ wage-reduction agreement meant that Lucasfilm and Pixar agreed to a) never cold call each other’s employees; b) notify each other if making an offer to an employee of the other company, even if that employee applied for the job on his or her own without being recruited; c) any offer made would be “final” so as to avoid a costly bidding war that would drive up not just the employee’s salary, but also drive up the pay scale of every other employee in the firm.

Jobs held to this agreement, and used it as the basis two decades later to suppress employee costs just as fierce competition was driving up tech engineers’ wages.

The companies argued that the non-recruitment agreements had nothing to do with driving down wages. But the court ruled that there was “extensive documentary evidence” that the pacts were designed specifically to push down wages, and that they succeeded in doing so. The evidence includes software tools used by the companies to keep tabs on pay scales to ensure that within job “families” or titles, pay remained equitable within a margin of variation, and that as competition and recruitment boiled over in 2005, emails between executives and human resources departments complained about the pressure on wages caused by recruiters cold calling their employees, and bidding wars for key engineers.

Google, like the others, used a “salary algorithm” to ensure salaries remained within a tight band across like jobs. Although tech companies like to claim that talent and hard work are rewarded, in private, Google’s “People Ops” department kept overall compensation essentially equitable by making sure that lower-paid employees who performed well got higher salary increases than higher-paid employees who also performed well.

As Intel’s director of Compensation and Benefits bluntly summed up the Silicon Valley culture’s official cant versus its actual practices,

While we pay lip service to meritocracy, we really believe more in treating everyone the same within broad bands.

The companies in the pact shared their salary data with each other in order to coordinate and keep down wages — something unimaginable had the firms not agreed to not compete for each other’s employees. And they fired their own recruiters on just a phone call from a pact member CEO.

In 2007, when Jobs learned that Google tried recruiting one of Apple’s employees, he forwarded the message to Eric Schmidt with a personal comment attached: “I would be very pleased if your recruiting department would stop doing this.”

Within an hour, Google made a “public example” by “terminating” the recruiter in such a manner as to “(hopefully) prevent future occurrences.”

Likewise, when Intel CEO Paul Otellini heard that Google was recruiting their tech staff, he sent a message to Eric Schmidt: “Eric, can you pls help here???”

The next day, Schmidt wrote back to Otellini: “If we find that a recruiter called into Intel, we will terminate the recruiter.”

One of the reasons why non-recruitment works so well in artificially lowering workers’ wages is that it deprives employees of information about the job market, particularly one as competitive and overheating as Silicon Valley’s in the mid-2000s. As the companies’ own internal documents and statements showed, they generally considered cold-calling recruitment of “passive” talent — workers not necessarily looking for a job until enticed by a recruiter — to be the most important means of hiring the best employees.

Just before joining the wage-theft pact with Apple, Google’s human resources executives are quoted sounding the alarm that they needed to “dramatically increase the engineering hiring rate” and that would require “drain[ing] competitors to accomplish this rate of hiring.” One CEO who noticed Google’s hiring spree was eBay CEO Meg Whitman, who in early 2005 called Eric Schmidt to complain, “Google is the talk of the Valley because [you] are driving up salaries across the board.” Around this time, eBay entered an illegal wage-theft non-solicitation scheme of its own with Bill Campbell’s Intuit, which is still being tried in ongoing federal and California state suits.

Google placed the highest premium on “passive” talent that they cold-called because “passively sourced candidates offer[ed] the highest yield,” according to court documents. The reason is like the old Groucho Marx joke about not wanting to belong to a club that would let you join it — workers actively seeking a new employer were assumed to have something wrong with them; workers who weren’t looking were assumed to be the kind of good happy talented workers that company poachers would want on their team.

For all of the high-minded talk of post-industrial technotopia and Silicon Valley as worker’s paradise, what we see here in stark ugly detail is how the same old world scams and rules are still operative.

Follow all of the Techtopus coverage here.

 References

• Singer, Bill. “After Apple, Google, Adobe, Intel, Pixar, And Intuit, Antitrust Employment Charges Hit eBay”. Forbes. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
• DOJ. “Complaint, US v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al” (PDF). DOJ. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
• “Complaint, Hariharan v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al” (PDF). Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
• “Complaint, US v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al” (PDF). Department of Justice. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
• Richey, Warren. “Lucasfilm settles antitrust case over wage suppression of top animators”. The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
• “Complaint, US v. Lucasfilm Ltd”. Department of Justice. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
• “Justice Department Requires Six High Tech Companies to Stop Entering into Anticompetitive Employee Solicitation Agreements” (Press release). United States Department of Justice. September 24, 2010. Retrieved 2016-01-14.
• “U.S. v. Adobe Systems, Inc., et al.: Final Judgment”. United States Department of Justice. March 17, 2011. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
• “Judge OKs class-action suit against Apple, Intel, Google, Adobe”. San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
• Dan Levine (2014-04-24). “Apple, Google agree to settle lawsuit alleging hiring conspiracy”. Chicago Tribune. Reuters. Retrieved 2016-01-17.
• Rosenblatt, Joel. “Apple, Google Must Face Group Antitrust Hiring Lawsuit”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 2013-10-27.
• “Judge Grants Class-Action Status in Silicon Valley Hiring Suit”. The Wall Street Journal. 2002-10-03. Retrieved 2013-10-27.
• “Complaint, Hariharan v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al” (PDF). Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
• Cooley, Brian (2014-05-16). “Judge approves first payout in antitrust wage-fixing lawsuit”. CNET. Retrieved 2016-01-17.
• “Dockets & Filings: In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation”. Justia. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
• Levine, Dan (2014-04-24). “Apple, Google agree to settle lawsuit alleging hiring, salary conspiracy”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 2016-01-17.
• Levine, Dan (2014-04-24). “Apple, Google agree to settle lawsuit alleging hiring conspiracy”. Reuters. Retrieved 2016-01-17.
• “Apple, Google, Intel, Adobe Settle for $324.5 Million”. Bloomberg News. Retrieved 2014-05-26.
• “Judge questions settlement in Silicon Valley no-poaching case”. San Jose Mercury News. 2014-06-19. Retrieved 2016-01-17.
• “Court Rejects Deal on Hiring in Silicon Valley”. The New York Times. 9 August 2014.
• “Judge Koh Sets April 2015 Trial In Tech Anti-Poach Row”. Retrieved 2015-01-13.

22. “Court preliminarily approves $415m settlement of high-tech no-poaching lawsuit”. Retrieved 2015-06-30.

External links

• Docket for US v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al.
• Docket for US v. Lucasfilm Ltd.
• The Silicon Valley Anti-Poaching Conspiracy
• Docket for In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
• Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Motion for Class Certification, In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, no 11-CV-02509 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2013)
• High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation Settlement Administration Website
• http://pando.com/tag/techtopus/
• *http://pando.com/2014/03/30/court-docs-google-hiked-wages-to-combat-hot-young-facebook-after-sheryl-sandberg-refused-to-join-hiring-cartel/

Catch and Kill By Ronan Farrow –  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch_and_Kill:_Lies,_Spies,_and_a_Conspiracy_to_Protect_Predators

Permanent Record By Edward Snowden–  https://www.amazon.com/Permanent-Record-Edward-Snowden/dp/1250237238

Brotopia By Emily Chang  –  http://brotopiabook.com/

Throw Them All Out By Peter Schweizer – http://peterschweizer.com/books/throw-them-all-out/

The Circle (Based on Google and Facebook) By David Eggers – https://archive.org/details/circle00dave

World Without Mind By Franklin Foer – https://www.amazon.com/World-Without-Mind-Existential-Threat/dp/1101981113

A Journey into the Savage Heart of Silicon Valley By Corey Pein – https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35684687-live-work-work-work-die

Disrupted By Dan Lyons – https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/26030703-disrupted

Chaos Monkeys By Antonio García Martínez – https://www.antoniogarciamartinez.com/chaos-monkeys/

The Creepy Line By Matthew Taylor – https://www.thecreepyline.com/

The Cleantech Crash By Leslie Stahl –  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cleantech-crash-60-minutes/

Congress: Trading Stock By Steve Kroft – https://www.cbsnews.com/news/congress-trading-stock-on-inside-information/

THE INVESTIGATIONS OF THE CORRUPTION AT GOOGLE:

From INSIDE Google, our team saw Google manipulate the entire internet to hype up Larry Page’s “boyfriend’: Elon Musk and Tesla, which Google execs owned a portion of, while sabotaging Tesla’s competitors. Google illicitly and illegally timed these manipulations with stock market pump-and-dump efforts to exploit insider trading. That is a felony violation of RICO, Antitrust and other laws. Every single thing that Google does is contrived to harm a competitor, a politician, an employee whistle-blower or some other business adversary. There are no “bugs”, “operator errors”, “server anomalies” or other media “accidents” at Google. Everything Google does is contrived, at a psychological warfare kind of level, to change a social perception.

Google must show its software to FBI, SEC, FTC and our search engine optimisation experts to prove that they did not engage in these crimes. The fact is: We can prove they did the crimes and FBI experts can help us prove it!

In a similar case unfolding in Britain over whether Google wrongly demoted price comparison rival Foundem from its search results in favour of paid-for adverts, Google must now decide which it values more: the algorithms that rank its search results, or its stance that manually fiddling with those results to promote its own paid-for products over rivals’ sites doesn’t break competition laws.

High Court judge Mr Justice Roth posed the stark question to Google’s lawyers in mid-March, just as the global coronavirus situation began triggering governmental responses in the West.

Foundem had asked for legal permission to bring in independent expert Philipp Klöckner to read confidential documents disclosed by Google in court.

Those documents were court exhibits filed by Google engineers Cody Kwok and Michael Pohl. They sought, as the judge put it, “to explain the operation and aims of Google’s ranking algorithms, and how they have been applied to shopping comparison sites generally and Foundem in particular”.

Foundem has been pursuing Google since 2006, when a flip of the switch at Mountain View caused the price-comparison site to vanish down Google’s search rankings. Foundem argues that Google’s demotion of it was a deliberate act to penalise a commercial rival and an abuse of Google’s dominant market position.

Google denies this and is defending a High Court claim from Foundem as well as an EU competition investigation triggered by the website. The High Court case is stuck at a very early stage, despite having been filed in 2012, thanks to the EU investigation.

Foundem’s lawyers, the company argued in the High Court, wouldn’t be able to understand the technical algorithm evidence without having an SEO expert on hand. While not disputing this, Google strongly objected to Klöckner because he is a working SEO consultant: the Chocolate Factory is terrified of the SEO industry getting a proper glimpse under the bonnet and seeing how the search engine really operates. It told Mr Justice Roth:

The integrity of Google’s ranking processes relies upon all webmasters or website owners having the same degree of access to information about Google’s ranking… This will no longer be the case if information of this kind is made available to some individuals offering commercial services to assist companies to improve their Search ranking.

It also claimed Klöckner was potentially biased against it because he had done work for Trivago and Visual Meta, two firms that previously complained to the EU Commission about Google’s anti-competitive practices.

Foundem suggested Google could simply withdraw the evidence so nobody would need to read it, while Google dug in and insisted the evidence was vital to help prove its case that nothing bad was done here. Thus Mr Justice Roth gave the adtech monolith a choice. Either it could withdraw the evidence as Foundem suggested, or it could agree to let Klöckner read the algorithm papers. The SEO expert would be given legal permission to enter two so-called confidentiality rings where he could read unredacted copies of the documents and talk to lawyers about them.

“If Google maintains its present course, then for the reasons I have explained I will grant the application that Mr Klöckner be admitted to those two rings until further order,” said the judge! We are strongly advocating for full Court review of Google’s manipulations in every possible Court.

Google is a criminal operation. It’s executives have been publicly exposed as participants in horrific sex scandals, money laundering, political bribery and racism. It is time for the bought and paid shill politicians to stop protecting them!

One of the “Godfather’s” of the Silicon Valley Cartel is Eric Schmidt. He is typical of the Cartel bosses that know each other, date each other, party together, use the same lawyers, get involved in the same sex scandals and lawsuits and pay stock bribes to the same politicians..

In July 2016, Raymond Thomas, a four-star general and head of the U.S. Special Operations Command, hosted a guest: Eric Schmidt, the chairman of Google.

General Thomas, who served within the 1991 gulf war and deployed many times to Afghanistan, spent the higher half of a day showing Mr. Schmidt around Special Operations Command’s headquarters in Tampa, Fla. They scrutinized prototypes for a robotic exoskeleton suit and joined operational briefings, which Mr. Schmidt needed to study extra about as a result of he had recently begun advising the military on technology.

After the go-to, as they rode in a Chevy Suburban towards an airport, the conversation turned to a form of artificial intelligence.

“You absolutely suck at machine learning,” Mr. Schmidt informed General Thomas, the officer recalled. “If I got under your tent for a day, I could solve most of your problems.” General Thomas said he was so offended that he needed to throw Mr. Schmidt out of the car, however refrained.

Four years later, Mr. Schmidt, 65, has channeled his blunt assessment of the military’s tech failings into a private campaign to revamp America’s defense forces with extra engineers, extra software program and extra A.I. In the method, the tech billionaire, who left Google last year, has reinvented himself because of the prime liaison between Silicon Valley and the national security community.

Mr. Schmidt now sits on two government advisory boards aimed toward bounce beginning technological innovation in the Defense Department. His confidants embrace former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and ex-Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work. And by means of his personal enterprise capital agency and a $13 billion fortune, Mr. Schmidt has invested millions of {dollars} into more than half a dozen defense start-ups.

In an interview, Mr. Schmidt — by turns thoughtful, pedagogical and hubristic — stated he had embarked on an effort to modernize the U.S. military because it was “stuck in software in the 1980s.”

He portrayed himself as a successful technologist who didn’t consider in retirement and who owed a debt to the country for his wealth — and who now had time and perception to resolve one of America’s hardest issues. The purpose, he stated, “should be to have as many software companies to supply software of many, many different kinds: military, H.R. systems, email systems, things which involve military intelligence, weapons systems and what have you.”

Mr. Schmidt is urgent ahead with a Silicon Valley worldview the place advances in software program and A.I. are the keys to determining nearly any situation. While that philosophy has led to social networks that spread disinformation and different unintended penalties, Mr. Schmidt stated he was convinced that making use of new and comparatively untested technology to complex conditions — together with lethal ones — would make service members extra environment friendly and bolster the United States in its competition with China.

His techno-solutionism is difficult by his ties to Google. Though Mr. Schmidt left the corporate’s board final June and has no official working function, he holds $5.Three billion in shares of Google’s parent, Alphabet. He also stays on the payroll as an adviser, incomes a $1 annual wage, with two assistants stationed at Google’s Silicon Valley headquarters.

That has led to allegations that Mr. Schmidt is placing Google’s financial pursuits forward of different concerns in his protection work. Late final yr, a federal court ordered a congressional advisory committee he leads to flip over data that would make clear whether or not Mr. Schmidt had advocated his business interests whereas heading the group.

Mr. Schmidt stated he had adopted guidelines to keep away from conflicts. “Everybody is rule-bound at the Pentagon, and we are too,” he stated.

Google and the Defense Department declined to touch upon Mr. Schmidt’s work.

Even without these issues, shifting the military’s path isn’t any easy process. While Mr. Schmidt has helped generate reports and recommendations about know-how for the Pentagon, few have been adopted.

“I’m sure he’ll be frustrated,” stated Representative Mac Thornberry, a Republican of Texas who nominated Mr. Schmidt in 2018 to an advisory committee on A.I. “Unlike the private sector, you can’t just snap your fingers and make it happen.”

Mr. Schmidt acknowledged that progress was sluggish. “I am bizarrely told by my military friends that they have moved incredibly fast, showing you the difference of time frames between the world I live in and the world they live in,” he stated.

But he stated he had little intention of backing down. “The way to understand the military is that the soldiers spend a great deal of time looking at screens. And human vision is not as good as computer vision,” he stated. “It’s insane that you have people going to service academies, and we spend an enormous amount of training, training these people, and we put them in essentially monotonous work.”

Mr. Schmidt’s first brush with the military got here in 1976, whereas he was in graduate college on the University of California, Berkeley. There, he centered on research on distributed computing, funded by cash from Darpa, an analysis arm of the Defense Department.

The work catapulted Mr. Schmidt into his technology profession. After finishing his graduate studies in pc science, he labored at various tech firms for more than twenty years, together with the networking software maker Novell. In 2001, Google appointed him chief govt.

The search engine firm was then in its infancy. Its 20-something founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, were contemporary out of a Stanford University doctorate program and had little business expertise. Mr. Schmidt was hired to assist information them, offering “adult supervision,” which he did — after which some.

Mr. Schmidt took Google public in 2004 and built it right into a behemoth, diversifying into smartphones, cloud computing and self-driving cars. The success turned him right into an enterprise movie star. In 2009, he served as a tech adviser to the Obama administration.

In 2011, with Google price almost $400 billion, the corporate introduced Mr. Page was able to resume the C.E.O. reins. Mr. Schmidt turned govt chairman.

In that function, Mr. Schmidt took on new tasks, many of which introduced him to Washington. In 2012, he participated in categorized briefings on cybersecurity with Pentagon officers as half of the Enduring Security Framework program. In 2015, he attended a seminar on the banks of the Potomac River, hosted by then-Defense Secretary Ash Carter, on the use of know-how inside the government.

“It was all interesting to me,” Mr. Schmidt stated. “I didn’t really know much about it.”

He additionally traveled to North Korea, Afghanistan and Libya whereas writing a guide about know-how and diplomacy, and dabbled in politics, lending technical assist to Hillary Clinton within the run-up to her 2016 presidential marketing campaign.

His enterprise capital fund, Innovation Endeavors, was lively too. It invested in start-ups like Planet Labs, which operates satellites and sells the imagery to protection and intelligence companies, and Team8, a cybersecurity firm based by former Israeli intelligence members.

At the 2016 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Mr. Carter requested Mr. Schmidt to fulfill. He had a proposal: Could Mr. Schmidt lead the Defense Innovation Board, a civilian advisory group tasked with bringing new technology to the Pentagon?

“We were in one of these dumpy hotels, and there he is with his small entourage walking in, and he basically said to me, ‘This is what I want to do. You’d be the perfect person to be chairman,’” Mr. Schmidt said.

Mr. Schmidt said he turned down the function as a result of he was busy and had no military background. But Mr. Carter argued that Mr. Schmidt’s tech experience was wanted, because the U.S. military — which had as soon as been a middle of innovation — was falling behind companies like Google and Facebook in software and A.I.

Mr. Schmidt finally agreed. (Mr. Carter didn’t reply to requests for remark.)

As head of the Defense Innovation Board, Mr. Schmidt started touring navy bases, plane carriers and plutonium strongholds. The journeys, which took Mr. Schmidt to about 100 bases in locations like Fayetteville, N.C., and Osan, South Korea, have been a definite break from his well-heeled life in Silicon Valley.

“You want to see these things,” Mr. Schmidt stated. “I received the nuclear missile tour. Things which are exhausting. I received a tour of Cheyenne Mountain so I might perceive what their actuality was.”

One of the primary journeys was to Tampa to go to General Thomas, who is named Tony, the place Mr. Schmidt saw maps and reside video feeds displayed on huge screens. “Eric’s observation was that a huge part of what the military does is it sits and watches,” stated Josh Marcuse, the then executive director of the Defense Innovation Board who was on the journey.

The visits made tangible what Mr. Carter had told Mr. Schmidt about how the military was lagging in technology. Mr. Schmidt quickly made ideas to vary that.

Some of his concepts have been impractical. Eric Rosenbach, then the chief of workers to Mr. Carter, recalled Mr. Schmidt as soon as telling him that the Pentagon can be higher off if it employed nobody however engineers for a year.

Others have been helpful. At an Air Force facility in Qatar in 2016, Mr. Schmidt visited officers who scheduled flight paths for the tankers that refueled planes. They used a white board and dry-erase markers to set the schedule, taking eight hours to finish the duty.

Mr. Schmidt stated he recalled considering, “Really? This is how you run the air war?” Afterward, he and others on the Defense Department labored with the tech company Pivotal to ship software to the officers.

On one other journey to a navy base in South Korea in 2017, an intelligence analyst complained to Mr. Schmidt that the software program he used to evaluate surveillance movies from North Korea was clunky.

“Let me guess,” Mr. Schmidt said, according to a Defense Department aide who traveled with him. “You don’t have the flexibility to change that.”

In December 2017, Mr. Schmidt stepped down as Google’s chairman however remained on the board. He said he was seeking a brand new chapter.

“If I stayed as chairman, then next year would have been the same as the previous year, and I wanted a change of emphasis,” said Mr. Schmidt. “As chairman of Google, what I did is I ran around and gave speeches, and went to Brussels and all the things that Google still does today. It’s much better to work on these new things for me.”

Google declined to comment on Mr. Schmidt’s departure as chairman.

By then, Mr. Schmidt’s ties to Google had induced issues in his protection work. In 2016, Roma Laster, a Defense Department worker, filed a complaint on the company elevating considerations about Mr. Schmidt and conflicts of curiosity, Mr. Marcuse stated.

In the complaint, earlier reported by ProPublica, Ms. Laster, who labored with the Defense Innovation Board, said Mr. Schmidt had requested a service member what cloud computing providers their unit used and whether or not they had thought-about options. She stated Mr. Schmidt confronted a battle of interest as a result of he worked for Google, which additionally gives cloud services.

Mr. Marcuse, who now works at Google, said Mr. Schmidt was “scrupulous and diligent” in avoiding conflicts. Mr. Schmidt said he adopted the principles forbidding conflicts of interest. Ms. Laster didn’t reply to requests for remark.

Mr. Schmidt quickly received caught up in one other situation between Google and the military. Google had signed a contract in 2017 to assist the Pentagon to construct methods to automatically analyze drone footage to identify particular objects like buildings, vehicles, and people.

Mr. Schmidt was a proponent of the hassle, known as Project Maven. He stated he inspired the Pentagon to pursue it and testified in Congress in regards to the undertaking’s deserves, however was not concerned within the company’s selection of Google.

But the effort blew up in 2018 when Google employees protested and stated they didn’t need their work to result in deadly strikes. More than 3,000 staff signed a letter to Mr. Pichai, saying the contract would undermine the general public’s belief within the firm.

It was a black eye for Mr. Schmidt. Military officers, who stated Project Maven was not getting used for deadly missions, condemned Google for abandoning the contract. Google staff additionally criticized Mr. Schmidt’s ties to the Pentagon.

“He has very different goals and values than the engineers at his company,” stated Jack Poulson, a Google worker who protested Mr. Schmidt’s military work and who has since left the company.

Mr. Schmidt said he sidestepped discussions about Project Maven as a result of of conflict-of-interest guidelines, however wished he might have weighed in. “I would have certainly had an opinion,” he stated.

Last April, Mr. Schmidt announced he deliberate to go away Google’s board. He had helped create an A.I. middle backed by the Pentagon in 2018 and had additionally turn into co-chair of the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, a brand new group advising Congress on developing A.I. for defense.

A month after leaving Google, Mr. Schmidt invested in Rebellion Defense, a software program start-up based by former Defense Department staff that analyzes video gathered through drone. His enterprise agency later put more cash into the company, and Mr. Schmidt joined its board.

The funding led to extra bother. The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a nonprofit privateness and civil liberties group, sued the A.I. commission last September for failing to show over data. EPIC said the group was stacked with industry executives like Mr. Schmidt and others from Microsoft, Amazon and Oracle, who could potentially sway the government in favor of their companies’ interests.

Mr. Schmidt was underneath scrutiny as a result of of Rebellion Defense and the way he might push the government to make use of the start-up’s services, EPIC said.

“We don’t have any public disclosure about what information Eric has provided to the commission about his business interests,” said John Davisson, a legal professional at EPIC.

In December, a district court dominated the A.I. fee should disclose the data requested by EPIC. The fee has launched a whole lot of pages of paperwork, most of which don’t contain Mr. Schmidt or his companies. EPIC stated extra data are set to be launched.

Chris Lynch, the chief executive of Rebellion Defense, said Mr. Schmidt suggested the company solely on hiring and growth. Mr. Schmidt said he didn’t advocate for the Defense Department to purchase technology from the start-up.

He has continued plowing forward. In November, he unveiled a $1 billion dedication by means of Schmidt Futures, the philanthropic agency that he runs along with his spouse, Wendy, to fund education for those who want to work in public service.

Google’s philandering exec Eric Schmidt cares about his …

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72wlClEZW8s

Google exec Eric Schmidt is a love machine at age 58, which is quite an achievement considering how dorky he looked during what should have been his sexual prime three decades ago. For all you …

Former Lover Exposes Eric Schmidt – American Intelligence …

https://aim4truth.org/2019/07/02/former-lover-exposes-eric-schmidt/

The following is a transcript of an interview with a Google/Facebook/DARPA insider that was conducted with a member of the Anonymous Patriots, a citizen journalist group aligned with the American Intelligence Media. The person interviewed wishes to remain anonymous and for purposes of the interview will be called Jane Doe. This conversation took place on…

Google Deletes Videos Accusing It of Election Manipulation from YouTube… Which It Owns (thefreethoughtproject.com)

With All These Big Tech Revelations,

GOOGLE EXECS PANIC! Go Into Hiding – Delete Social Media Accounts After James O’Keefe’s Latest Exposé

White House Slams Google As Veritas Censorship Controversy Escalates (bitchute.com)

Google’s NSA Again Exposed For Unauthorized Collection Of Americans’ Phone Records (zerohedge.com)

What exactly is google’s business model besides selling ads no one clicks on and selling people’s data to the NSA? (AskVoat)

So the “russian hackers” meddling in the election was Google all along. Why isn’t this the biggest story in America right now? None of the “trusted” news sources have commented on this at all. (politics)

Google stealthily infuses political agenda into products

Google Chrome is Tracking Your Every Move and Storing It, This is How to Stop It

Google Chrome Has Become Surveillance Software, It’s Time to Switch | (archive.fo)

2020 Election; Subliminal Google Messages to Alter Outcome …

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBmByyFkRlo

Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, and Apple: these companies, the big 5, know almost everything about your life. They know what websites you go to, what y…

——————————

THE LIES, CORRUPTION AND ANTI-TRUST VIOLATING INSIDER TRADING SCAMS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Any voyage onto the path of funding from the Department of Energy will be a road to hell.

While frozen-smile aides will shake your hand and tell you how “excited they are to welcome your application“, behind your back they are sharpening their knives.

Over 100 past Applicants were lied to, defrauded, stone-walled, bottom-drawer’d, sabotaged, and generally screwed with by The Department of Energy in order to: 1.) protect campaign financiers who were their competitors and 2.) stone-wall those Applicant’s for being competitive against the Elon Musk and Solyndra chosen insiders.

Almost EVERY competing Applicant was faster, cheaper, had better MPG, was easier to manufacture, had lower cost to the main-stream market, had a better set of financials, had a better debt ratio, was safer, etc. but they missed one key factor: THEY DID NOT OFFER BRIBES AS LARGE AS ELON MUSK DID!

Even in 2020 you would have to be a sucker to apply for DOE funds. There are people inside DOE who are dedicated to making sure you never get that money. You can get a faster loan from a commercial bank without thousands of hidden “gotchas” and insider trading schemes to trip you up. These tricks, built into the Department of Energy process, are created to ensure that DOE insiders have thousands of excuses to never let you get the money unless you agree to finance the correct political candidates.

Title XVII Innovative Energy Technology Loan Guarantee Program

DOE is supposed to support the commercial development of innovative clean energy technologies through its Loan Programs Office (LPO). Authorized by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Title XVII Loan Program enables the DOE to issue loans ranging from several million to more than $1 billion for advanced fossil, advanced nuclear, renewable energy and energy efficiency projects that employ “new or significantly improved technology.” And in 2018, LPO announced an open solicitation for energy projects on tribal lands. These solicitations remain open and are supposedly actively seeking qualified applicants as a result of continued congressional support and new programmatic direction but the historical facts prove that this program has been manipulated to operate as a political slush-fund to finance insider favorites and sabotage their competitors.

Under Title XVII program authority, the DOE can guarantee loans for up to 80 percent of total project costs for eligible proposals. As of March 2020, LPO maintains $25.9 billion in loan guarantee authority across the solicitations mentioned above. LPO has closed only one loan since 2011 – for the Vogtle nuclear power station in Georgia and, more than ever, seems to be simply a sham for insider political campaign financiers to get payola from. Notably, LPO is under increasing pressure from Congress to move more applications through diligence and to loan close.

Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Program

Under the ATVM Program, automobile manufacturers or advanced vehicle automobile component or material manufacturers are supposed to eligible to obtain direct loans from the DOE for projects that re-equip, expand or establish manufacturing facilities in the U.S. to produce “ultra-efficient vehicles,” passenger automobiles, light duty trucks or associated components that meet the DOE’s emission and fuel economy standards for “advanced technology vehicles.” Political insiders will always, though, find a way to disqualify any applicant who competes with campaign financier favorites. Hundreds of highly qualified applicants were denied because Elon Musk knew they could put Tesla out of business without DOE’s exclusive support of his monopoly. Tesla’s own senior staff have written widely about the ‘gate-keeper’ insider trading scam at DOE. DOE is an anti-trust operator who is a gatekeeper of industry winners and losers based on who donated the most to certain PACs.

To date, the DOE has funded five loans under the ATVM program totaling $8.4 billion, approximately one-third of its $25 billion loan authority. The ATVM program is not subject to an expiration date, and despite previous congressional efforts to rescind ATVM’s corruption-based funding, the program and its remaining $16.6 billion in loan authority remain available for insider projects that can be trusted to kick campaign financing back to certain politicians. In the most recent DOE funding bill, Congress directed LPO to “expeditiously evaluate and adjudicate all loan applications received” by the ATVM program, another sign that Congress wants to see a resumption of federal loan guarantees.

The Secretary of Energy and the Chief Counsel for the United States Department of Energy have been challenged, in writing, to provide the names of ANY Loan Programs Office (LPO) or Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Program official, reviewer, advisor or staffer who was not, from 2007 forward, either financed by, friends, with, sleeping with, dating the staff of, holding stock market assets in, promised a revolving door job or government service contracts from, partying with, personal friends with, photographed at private events with, exchanging emails with, business associates of or directed by; one of those business adversaries, or the Senators and Department of Energy politicians that those business adversaries pay campaign finances to, or supply political digital services to. From 2008 forward, The White House and The Department Of Energy were controlled by the Silicon Valley tech oligarchs! That is a violation of the law, the Constitution and the American Way.

Department of Energy PR officials blindly push their revisionist history propaganda party-line hype that the DOE has been “fair and successful”. There has never been a bigger lie on Earth since the first frat boy told the first sorority girl “don’t worry, I won’t get it in your mouth..”

One group used CIA and FBI style investigation tools to hunt down every reviewer, contractor and insider involved in the Loan Programs Office (LPO) or Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Program since 2007. A forensic chart was produced showing the insider trading, revolving door and social engagements of each. In almost 97% of the cases, every person was found to have glaringly unethical, often criminal, conflicts of interest between beneficiary lines of connection.

In fact, multiple groups have insisted that the FBI, the NSA, The CIA and 60 Minutes conduct their own independent studies, on a name, by name basis of the DOE staff involved and publish the results of that study to Congress and the public.

The U.S. Department of Energy has supplied no apologies, no compensation for damages to the victims and no halt in the slush-fund payola schemes!

Do you doubt the veracity of these claims? Show this letter to Bill Cooper, the head lawyer for DOE. Ask him to provide forensic data proving any of these assertions are not true! He can’t do it!

We can provide thousands of FBI agents, investigative journalists and Congressional staff to prove these assertions are true.

Dept. of Energy staff claim that they got rid of all of the bad people at DOE and that the evil ones don’t work there any more but OPM confirms that to be a lie. The stock market holdings, revolving door deals, voter records and social media postings of the current Dept of Energy staff prove that the corrupt ones never left. Tell DOE to take a look at their moral construct if they contact you!

See http://www.majestic111.com for more on this.

Jay Carney was Obama’s “Hit Man” in the Oval Office at The White House during the Cleantech Crash. It was Carney who helped order character assassinations and hit jobs on members of the public who spoke out about the crimes. Carney was recently caught, again, ordering hit jobs at Amazon, as well. In a famous magazine interview, his home was revealed to be covered in communist propaganda posters.

Leaked notes from an internal meeting of Amazon leadership obtained by VICE News reveal company executives discussed a plan to smear fired warehouse employee Christian Smalls, calling him “not smart or articulate” as part of a PR strategy to make him “the face of the entire union/organizing movement.”

“He’s not smart, or articulate, and to the extent the press wants to focus on us versus him, we will be in a much stronger PR position than simply explaining for the umpteenth time how we’re trying to protect workers,” wrote Amazon General Counsel David Zapolsky in notes from the meeting forwarded widely in the company.

The discussion took place at a daily meeting, which included CEO Jeff Bezos, to update each other on the coronavirus situation. Amazon SVP of Global Corporate Affairs Jay Carney described the purpose to CNN on Sunday: “We go over the update on what’s happening around the world with our employees and with our customers and our businesses. We also spend a significant amount of time just brainstorming about what else we can do” about COVID-19.

Amazon fired the warehouse worker Smalls, after he led a walkout of a number of employees at a Staten Island distribution warehouse. Amazon says he was fired for violating a company-imposed 14-day quarantine after he came into contact with an employee who tested positive for the coronavirus.

Zapolsky’s notes from the meeting detail Amazon’s plan to deal with a wave of bad press and calls for investigations from elected officials following the firing of Smalls. They also show top Amazon brass wanted to make Smalls the focus of its narrative when questioned about worker safety.

“We should spend the first part of our response strongly laying out the case for why the organizer’s conduct was immoral, unacceptable, and arguably illegal, in detail, and only then follow with our usual talking points about worker safety,” Zapolsky wrote. “Make him the most interesting part of the story, and if possible make him the face of the entire union/organizing movement.”

They discussed encouraging Amazon executives to use Smalls to discredit the wider labor movement at Amazon. Employees at the warehouse, known as JFK8, launched an effort to unionize in 2018.

In his notes, Zapolsky wrote that there was “general agreement” on this point among the other attendees of the meeting. (Zapolsky’s notes also mention SVP of worldwide operations and customer service Dave Clark and SVP of human resources Beth Galetti.) This is the typical culture of the Obama crowd of insider executives who will destroy any citizen who gets in their way. Jay Carney runs a Massive covert organized corruption team at Amazon in order to manipulate Democracy.

Massive covert organized corruption teams operate these kinds of manipulation of the truth and of Democracy with the cooperation of U.S. Senators and agencies like The Department of Energy.

Examples of these groups include Pacronym and American Bridge who are part of Arabella Advisors, a consulting firm that is not required to identify its donors. 

Pacronym’s affiliated groups create a large network of fake local news outlets that are designed to promote progressive viewpoints inside battleground states in order to rig insider trading for their top bosses. 

They are all part of a wealthy dark money network that manipulates public policy for personal profiteering.

American Bridge 21st Century and Pacronym are cutting ads thrashing outsiders as super PACs who go after people they don’t like, The Washington Post reported. Both groups also have ties to two fake false-front large nonprofit groups — New Venture Fund and Sixteen Thirty Fund — connected to a massive extreme-leaning consulting group.

NVF gave one of Pacronym’s nonprofits — ACRONYM — $250,000 while providing American Bridge $40,000 in 2018, according to NVF’s 2018 IRS documents. IRS records also indicated American Bridge pulled in $200,000 in 2018 from nonprofit Sixteen Thirty Fund, which reportedly spent $141 million on various extreme-leaning causes during the midterm election year.

Sixteen Thirty Fund and nonprofit NVF are tied into the same sprawling network, according to an analysis by investigators. Arabella Advisors, a philanthropic consulting company based in Washington, D.C., manages four nonprofits, including the NVF, Sixteen Thirty Fund, Hopewell Fund and the Windward Fund.

Sixteen Thirty Fund has not responded to requests for comment, while NVF acknowledged making a grant to ACRONYM in 2018 but noted that it “has nothing to do with the activities at PACRONYM or American Bridge.”

Arabella representative Steve Sampson called NVF merely a “client of ours,” even though the consulting group shares a Washington, D.C., office with all four groups, according to NVF and Sixteen Thirty Fund’s 2018 IRS records. American Bridge has not responded to requests for comment.

“Arabella Network is the umbrella, and they have these two funds that flow toward both of these groups. A clearly full-blown extremist arm that is casting itself as a nonprofit is politiicizing this event,” former Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt told the press.

Laxalt is the Outside Counsel to Americans for Public Trust, a group dedicated to uncovering unethical behavior. Americans for Public Trust has covered the network in the past. (RELATED: Billionaire Allegedly Behind A False Flag Operation In Alabama Helped Finance The Group Behind Iowa Caucus Chaos)

“American lives are more important than scoring cheap political points,” he added after suggesting that the group is striking while the iron is hot and making certain they capitalize on a crisis that has so far killed thousands of people.

Laxalt is referring to Pacronym’s announcement on March 17 to plow $5 million into a digital advertising campaign railing against those they hate. The ads are published through Four is Enough, a Pacronym project.

ACRONYM’s founder said the campaign makes sense from a public health and national security perspective.

Democratic operative David Plouffe another Jay Carney-type “hit-man”, who managed former President Barack Obama’s 2008 White House bid, sits alongside McGowan on ACRONYM’s board.

ACRONYM has not responded to the DCNF’s repeated requests for comment. (RELATED: Tech Firm Behind Iowa Caucus Disaster Also Played Role In Creating A Covert Democratic Propaganda Media Outfit)

Some academics argued that orchestrating such a campaign skirts ethical rules. Running advertisements thrashing the president during a health crisis looks bad, according to Daniel Kreiss, a professor of political communication at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

“It’s a very fine line between ensuring that the president has the legitimacy to speak authoritatively on what Americans must do in order to be safe, and the very real and legitimate questions to raise regarding how the president has handled this crisis given that he’s on the ballot in November,” Kreiss told WaPo in a March 17 report addressing the ad campaign push.

Laxalt, Nevada’s former attorney general, expressed a similar position.

“The timing of attacking the president in battleground states is appalling. If they are going to do it, then you name the place. I think that doing it right this second is outrageous,” he told the DCNF.

Meanwhile, ACRONYM’s McGowan is also creating a constellation of local news websites that act as progressive arms targeting the president and his policies.

McGowan, a digital producer for Obama for America in 2011 and the proprietor behind ACRONYM, raised at least $25 million from wealthy liberals to create a media company called Courier Newsroom that is designed to deliver information favorable to Democrats. Courier is rolling out newspapers in swing states to counter what its founder believes is right-wing spin on Facebook and across the digital domain.

Along with the Courier Newsroom, McGowan is reportedly creating Virginia Dogwood and Arizona’s Copper Courier, among others that are expected to roll out in Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin, all battleground states.

Mind the Gap at Stanford University is an even sneakier covert group from this crowd. Their efforts haven’t previously been reported. They recently petitioned some donors for at least $100,000 to support its efforts. Backers include people like Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, San Francisco power broker Ron Conway, and a coterie of major Democratic donors from across Silicon Valley, including fundraiser Amy Rao. What is also unusual is that Mind the Gap is led not by highly experienced political hands, but by academics with no professional backgrounds as fundraisers. The group’s leaders are a pair of Stanford law professors: Barbara Fried, who has no apparent campaign experience, and Paul Brest, the former president of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Graham Gottlieb, a Stanford fellow who served in junior roles for former President Barack Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign and in his White House, is its executive director.

While dressed in khaki’s and acting like they are “saving the trees”, the people behind these groups are cold-blooded mercenaries drunk on power, hookers, private jets and a sense of being above-the-law.

ELON MUSK’S COMMAND AND CONTROL OF THE CRIMES AND CORRUPTION VIA HIS TECH CARTEL CONTRACTORS

“Musk buys media hype about himself on ALL of the main stream news sites, has his own troll-farms that type self-promotion glam posts about him on every blog on the web, floods all of the search engines with PR photos of himself and is clinically diagnosed as a ‘sociopath’. ..”

“…Elon Musk (Along with his Silicon Valley Cartel bromance frat boy buddies Eric Schmidt and Larry Page, et al) is a mobster-class criminal sociopath who hired business assassins to attack us and operated anti-trust and RICO law violating competitor “kill programs”. He used his windfall of taxpayer funded cash and Goldman Sachs assisted stock market manipulations and intelligence agency staff and tools from In-Q-Tel and Google to engage in these crimes. We have demanded that the FBI arrest him and that the SEC, FTC and NHTSA prosecute him. We will make certain that his legacy, for the rest of time, reveals the true facts about his crimes and political manipulations…“

Per his own staff, ex-wives, partners, ex-founders, suppliers, FBI, SEC, Congress and private investigators. These are all statements from court reports, investigations, FBI submissions and Congressional reports. Each numbered statement is associated with a numbered witness report containing the evidence for the statement.  Please pass this report around and post it on Tesla windshields. We demand a hearing, with Musk on-site, on a live Senate televised and webcast investigation hearing in Congress to go over each of these points.

Nobody On Earth Can Launder And Hide Illicit Cash, Or Bribe Politicians, Like Elon Musk

He’s worth an estimated $39 billion, but has repeatedly said he’s poor. He is a scumbag liar and a crook!

In one of a series of wild tweets posted last week, Elon Musk stated he would be “selling almost all physical possessions” and that he would “own no house.” He appears to be actually following through with that promise, as chronicled in a great story in The Wall Street Journal about Musk’s personal finances that you should go read.

According to the WSJ, despite being worth an estimated $39 billion on paper:

…he has to borrow, sometimes a lot, to pay for his lifestyle and business investments without liquidating shares that help him maintain control of the companies he runs. About half his Tesla stock is pledged as collateral for personal loans, an April 28 financial filing shows. Maintaining his equity stake—about 20%, or around $29 billion at its current valuation—is important for him to keep control over the Silicon Valley auto maker.

Musk also doesn’t take a salary at Tesla, but he apparently became eligible for stock options worth more than $1 billion this week. To get that money, he will need an eye-watering $592 million to exercise the option, according to the WSJ. It’s not clear if Musk has the money on hand to exercise that option or if the money raised from the house sales will be used to help pay for the sum. “Mr. Musk said he wasn’t selling his possessions because he needs the money,” the WSJ reported.

The article also lists a few times Musk has said he’s cash poor. Here’s one example:

Before Tesla went public, Mr. Musk told a judge during a contentious divorce with his first wife that he had run out of cash and had taken on emergency loans from friends to support his family and pay living expenses.

Here’s another:

Last year, Mr. Musk’s ability to access cash came up again during a defamation lawsuit over comments he made about a man involved in the rescue of a Thai soccer team from a flooded cave in 2018. A lawyer in the case said in a filing that Mr. Musk had described himself as “financially illiquid.”

The whole article has a lot of history about Musk, interesting information about his finances backed up by regulatory filings, and numerous quotes from Musk himself, and I sincerely recommend taking 10 minutes to read it in full.

Musk has Goldman Sachs, Welles Fargo and Wilson Sonsini Mobster-Class executive bankers hide his money in  a rabbit warren of HUNDREDS of trusts, shell corporations and fake charities from South Dakota, to Switzerland to the Cayman Islands to Russia.

A federal investigation to show the tentacular diagram of scams has been demanded!

FBI, SEC, FTC and citizen forensic investigators are hot on his trail, though!

These are the illicit things that sociopath narcissist Musk has engaged in with the taxpayer cash he mooched from government treasuries:

 

1. PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS HAVE PRODUCED REPORTS ON THE ELON MUSK AND TESLA MOTORS FRAUD, STOCK RIGGING, BRIBERY AND SAFETY INVESTIGATIONS that Musk’s Silicon Valley Sandhill Road venture capitalists cover-up.
2. Musk hides his money in illicit and false-front real-estate scams to avoid taxes and to launder money.
3. “His corrupt cobalt mines promote genocide in the Congo as seen in NETFLIX Black Earth Rising”.
4. “His corrupt cobalt mines promote mass rape in the Congo as seen in NETFLIX Black Earth Rising”.
5. “His corrupt cobalt mines promote child slave labor in the Congo as seen in NETFLIX Black Earth
   Rising”.
6. “He tries to bury his ill-gotten money from the taxpayers in gobs of real estate acquisitions and houses including his notorious purchase of the Vaughn DeGuigne Court mansion at 891 Crystal Springs Road, in Burlingame, California which is staged for his kinky sex parties and Illuminati-like cartel get-togethers…”
7. “His is not faithful to his girlfriends. Some of them are Ghislane Maxwell-type enablers, too, just to hang around his money and promote his sex schemes like Maxwell did for Epstein”
8. “The workers that build his batteries die or sicken from toxic poisoning and Musk tries to hide his dirty factories overseas”
9. “Tesla bribes U.S. Senators with cash and stock in order to get free taxpayer funds”
10. “He is addicted to drugs and booze”
11. “He has ‘sociopath-class’ mental issues and he is a narcissist…”
12. “Tesla has had more recalls for safety defects, per volume, than any other car maker. Musk refuses to allow the use of the word RECALL but the facts are the facts.”
13. “It is so easy to hack any Tesla and crash it, break into it or give it bad braking orders that it is criminally negligent to allow Tesla’s on the street. Even the Chinese have hacked Tesla’s from the other side of the world! Tesla’s have been hacked and remotely crashed, the drivers killed and Tesla covers this up…”
14. “His partner: Steve Jurvetson, has been charged with sex and corruption issues”
15. “He arranged government kick-backs with the White House”
16. His entire current existence is based on stock market scams created with taxpayer dollars and Goldman Sachs securities manipulations
17. “He is the world’s biggest government mooch and has taken more taxpayer cash than anyone in U.S. History as a billionaire who does not need a hand-out”
18. “He is a member of the Palo Alto Tech Mafia operated by Stanford University gay frat house guys”
19. “Google (who is a major Tesla investor) hides all negative Musk/Tesla news in digital media globally and hypes TSLA stock in order to profiteer with Tesla stock. This is a violation of federal SEC laws”
20. “More drivers have been caught driving drunk, in Tesla’s, than any other car Per Capita produced”
21. “Google boss Larry Page is Musk’s ‘bromance’ boyfriend buddy and he uses Google to cover-up Musk’s scandals”
22. “His so-called ‘foundation” is just a payola and tax evasion scam for his family. It is a charity scam”
23. “His batteries are the most dangerous use of lithium ion storage ever conceived”
24. “His partner: Panasonic, has been charged with multiple corruption, dumping, price rigging and manipulation crimes around the globe”
25. “Almost all of the internet ‘Tesla Fanboys’ are Russian troll farms and hired bloggers that Musk pays vast amounts of money to in order to hype up a fake image for him. Musk has over 1000 click-farm and Russian troll bloggers under his employ via various false-front cover organization contractors.
26. “The drug and murder-for-hire website: Silk Road, was built at drug-enthusiast Musk’s company SpaceX by Musk’s programmer and Musk hires many people from a group called: In-Q-Tel, who were caught with tons of cocaine on their airplanes in a DEA raid”
27. “His SpaceX is nothing more than a domestic spy satellite company”
28. In-Q-Tel supplies a number of Musk’s staff, yet In-Q-Tel has been accused of numerous criminal ventures and abuses of the public.
29. You never hear about these crimes because Musk’s buddies in Silicon Valley control 90% of the global media these days and they censor any bad news about Musk in order to protect their Cartel.
30. “Musk’s brain chip company tortures monkey’s and other small animals in bad science experiments”
31. “His father screwed his daughter and got her pregnant. His father seems to be a pedophile and incest participant”
32. “Dianne Feinstein and her family covertly own many Musk interests and arranged for him to get his funds from the taxpayers. She helped sabotage his competitors in her district”
33. “You can’t put out the fires when his batteries explode say fireman because Lithium fires are military class thermo-dynamics”
34. “The fumes from his lithium ion thermal battery vapors give you cancer, lung and brain damage”
35. Psychologists say that Musk is a self promoting, narcissistic, multi-billion dollar, self-aggrandizing PR hype addict.
36. Many of us know these facts from personal interaction with Musk, his companies and his politicians.
37. Everything in these reports can be proven in a jury trial, Congressional hearings or live TV debates but Musk would rather die than face uncontrolled public scrutiny.
38. Musk will do anything to keep this information from getting out, including hiring attack services like his Fusion GPS, Black Cube, Gawker and Gizmodo Kill services.
39. While Musk’s dirty deeds sound like a bad Hollywood movie script. It all really happened and there is now massive hard copy evidence to prove it.
40. Elon Musk exists because he bribed DNC politicians including Obama, Clinton and Senators Feinstein, Reid, Boxer, Harris, Spier and Pelosi to give him free taxpayer cash and government resources from the Department of Energy and the California political tax pool.
41. When you follow-the-money and the insider trading, stock ownership and crony payola kick-backs. The payola between Musk, his scummy cronies and the politicians is proven.
42. The Musk empire pays bribes in billions of dollars of Google (Where Musk’s boy buddy Larry Page works), Twitter, Facebook, Tesla, Netflix and Sony Pictures stock and stock warrants which is never reported to the FEC
43. The Musk empire pays bribes in billions of dollars of Google, Twitter, Facebook, Tesla, Netflix and Sony Pictures search engine rigging and shadow-banning which is never reported to the FEC
44. The Musk empire pays bribes in free rent
45. The Musk empire pays bribes in Male and female prostitutes
46. The Musk empire pays bribes in cars
47. The Musk empire pays bribes in dinners at fancy restaurants
48. The Musk empire pays bribes in socialite party financing
49. The Musk empire pays bribes in Sports Event Tickets
50. The Musk empire pays bribes in Political campaign printing and mailing services “Donations”
51. The Musk empire pays bribes in Secret PAC Financing. Musk’s empire is a massive political financing conduit for the DNC politicians via a tentacular array of covert shell corporations, trusts, 501C’s and stock bribes.
52. The Musk empire pays bribes in Jobs in Corporations in Silicon Valley For The Family Members of Those Who Take Bribes And Those Manage Bribes
53. The Musk empire pays bribes in “Consulting” contracts from McKinsey Consulting as fronted pay-off gigs
54. The Musk empire pays bribes in Overpriced “Speaking Engagements” which are really just pay-offs conduited for donors
55. The Musk empire pays bribes in Private jet rides and use of Government fuel depots (ie: Google handed out NASA jet fuel to staff)
56. The Musk empire pays bribes in commercial Real Estate
57. The Musk empire pays bribes in Fake mortgages
58. The Musk empire pays bribes in The use of Cayman, Boca Des Tores, Swiss and related money-laundering accounts and The use of HSBC, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Deustche Bank money laundering accounts and covert stock accounts
59. The Musk empire pays bribes in Free spam and bulk mailing services owned by Silicon Valley corporations
60. The Musk empire pays bribes in the use of high tech law firms such as Perkins Coie, Wilson Sonsini, MoFo, Covington & Burling, etc. to conduit bribes to officials
61. The U.S. Energy Dept (DOE) has been covering-up organized political crime activities in which government funds are being used as a slush-fund to pay off political campaign financiers and to pay for CIA/GPS Fusion-Class attacks on Silicon Valley business competitors via Musk political conduits.
62. Political campaign financiers and government agency staff share stock market holdings with each other under family trusts, shell corporations and layered Goldman Sachs accounts.
63. The basic Musk scam-deal goes like this: “Obama funds Tesla, Musk conduits campaign funds to Obama, top Obama staff profit off of insider Musk stocks…”
64. Elon Musk is a criminal, a mobster, an asshole, a balding fake-hair wearing, plastic surgery-addicted, bi-sexual douchebag, woman-abusing, sex addicted, tax evader. We can put this in writing because all of those identifications regarding Musk can be proven in court and are documented in existing lawsuits and news stories.
65. Musk exploits poor people and child slaves in the Congo and Afghanistan to mine his lithium and Cobalt. Look up this phrase on the top search engines: “child labor electric car batteries”.
66. Musk spends billions per year to hire Russian trolls, fake blogger fan-boys and buy fake news self-glory look-at-me articles about himself.
67. Musk thinks he is the ‘Jesus’ of Silicon Valley and he will do anything to make the public think so.
68. Musk is insecure because his father was abusive and his “trophy wife” Mother is overbearing so he developed sociopath-like mental issues.
69. Musk has been professionally diagnosed as a ‘psychotic narcissist.
70. He public stated on an investor call that he uses drugs and alcohol to get through the night. We have the tapes.
71. Musk relies on Google and the DNC Main Stream News (MSN) to hide bad news about him.
72. Fake News manipulator Google is run by Larry Page. Larry is Musk’s investor and bromance ‘Butt buddy’. They share an apartment.
73. Musk uses massive numbers of shell companies and trust funds to self-deal, evade the law and hide his bribes and stock market insider trading.
74. His brother ran Solar City and is now under federal investigation for securities fraud.
75. A huge number of Tesla drivers have been killed; pedestrians and oncoming drivers have also been killed, and Musk covers it up.
76. Extremist politicians and their controlled news outlets refuse to allow any articles about Musk’s crimes to be printed because they benefit from Musk’s crimes.
77. Investor oligarch’s Tim Draper and Steve Jurvetson are so fanatical about not being embarrassed from a Tesla bankruptcy that they will pump the TSLA stock and threaten anybody who might disclose the Musk misdeeds.
78. Peter Thiel, a Musk ‘boyfriend” also protects Musk. Musk, and his cronies, use Palantir, Google and related software to scan the entire internet every few minutes for any occurrence of the words: “Musk”, “Tesla” or “Tesla Fire”. They send trolls and fake bloggers (Many of them Russian) to put pro-Musk comments on the comments section of any blogs or articles discussing those topics and try to flood out the truth about Musk.
79. In EVERY blog that you read that mentions ‘Musk’, at least 1/3 of the comments have been placed their by Musk’s paid shills.
80. There are no “Tesla Fan Boys”. All of the fanatic Tesla comments on the internet are Musk’s, Thiel’s, Jurvetson’s and Draper’s fake fanboy trolls. Musk, himself, stays up late at night pretending to be a ‘Tesla Fan Boy’on blogs.
81. The ‘Silicon Valley Mafia; cartel of frat boy sociopath venture capitalists like Steve Jurvetson, Tim Draper, Eric Schmidt, et al; threaten those who do not support the cult of Tesla or their political candidates.
82. Musk holds the record for getting sued for fraud by his investors, wives, former partners, employees, suppliers and co-founders.
83. Elon Musk has gone out of his way to hire hundreds of ex-CIA and In-Q-Tel staff and assign them to “dirty tricks teams” to attack his competitors and elected officials who Musk hates.
84. Musk never founded his companies. He took Tesla away from the founder: Marty, in a hostile take-over!
85. Musk’s “Starlink” satellites are domestic spy and political manipulation tools – never get your internet from one. SpaceX is entirely a spy satellite operation.
86. The same kind of EMF radiation proven to cause cancer from cell phones exists in massive amounts in a Tesla.
87. Musk can’t fix a car or build a rocket and has almost no mechanical skills he can’t build or work on any of the things he made himself famous for.
88. If you pull a report of every VIN# of every Tesla ever built and cross reference that with insurance, repair and lawsuit records you will find that the “per volume” fire, crash, death and defect rate is THE WORST of any car maker in history!
89. Musk is a lying con artist and partners with Goldman Sachs to rig the stock market. Sachs has a dedicated team of 18+ men who rig stocks and valuation bumps for Musk.
90. Over 1000 witnesses can prove every one of those claims in any live televised Congressional hearing!
91. Senators Dianne Feinstein, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris and their associates own the stock in Tesla Motors and/or it’s suppliers and mining companies. That is why they criminally help cover-up investigations of Tesla!
92. All of this was reported, in writing, to James Comey, Patricia Rich and David Johnson at the FBI by those who supplied this information but Musk has yet to be arrested because crooked California politicians, who own his stock, protect him from arrest.
93. Why aren’t all of those parties in prison if it is so easy to prove the crime? Think back to recent history: the heads of the Department of Energy, the FBI, The DOJ and the U.S. Attorney General were kicked out of their jobs for corruption. THIS was the corruption they were doing. They all knew about this crime but they were covering it up.
94. Musk took over Tesla Motors in a hostile take-over in order to exploit lithium, cobalt and other mining corruption deals for his business partners.
95. When you take a look at the ‘lithium’ in Musk’s horrifically miss-engineered lithium ion batteries you will uncover horrible crimes engaged in to acquire it.
96. His batteries cause wars in the Congo, Afghanistan and Bolivia from the corrupt mining deals involved with mining lithium and cobalt.
97. Lithium ion batteries are insider trading-owned by ex-CIA boss Woolsey and DOE Boss Chu.
98. Lithium ion batteries excrete chemicals that mutate fetuses when they burn and destroy your brain, lungs and nervous system when they burn
99. Musk’s batteries kill the factory workers who make them
100. Musk’s batteries cause Panasonic to be one of the most corrupt companies in the world
101. Musk’s batteries poison the Earth when disposed of
102. Musk’s batteries can’t be extinguished by firemen
103. Musk’s batteries poison firemen when they burn
104. Musk’s batteries are based on criminally corrupt mining schemes like URANIUM ONE
105. Musk’s batteries have over 61 toxic chemicals in them
106. Musk’s batteries come from an industry that spends billions on internet shills and trolls used to nay say all other forms of energy
107. Musk’s batteries and are insider-trading owned by corrupt U.S. Senators who are running a SAFETY COVER-UP about their dangers.
108. Apple products with lithium ion batteries have been exploding and setting people on fire.
109. Over time the chemical dendrites, or deposits, inside each Musk battery grow worse and increase the chances of explosion as they age –
110. Musk’s LITHIUM ION BATTERIES BECOME MORE AND MORE LIKELY TO EXPLODE AS TIME GOES ON AND AS THEY AGE. This is not a theory. This is a scientific fact. That is why you hear about more and more lithium batteries catching fire and blowing up.
111. Additionally, scientists also speculate that the increasing presence of low energy nuclear background energy and wifi energy in the environment is making lithium ion batteries explode more often lately. This theory is upheld by the increasing number of FAA reports about commercial airline cabins suddenly “filling up with toxic smoke” as some lithium ion battery explodes in someones overhead luggage. As commercial jets go higher they lose the protection of the atmosphere and are subjected to more gamma (and other) radiation from overhead. This makes the already unstable lithium ion batteries on board blow up.
112. “Bad Guys” have figured out how to make them explode remotely in devices by making the device electronics cause the batteries to overload.
113. The dangers of lithium ion batteries are hidden by CNN and Main Stream News (MSN) because pretty much only the DNC people profit from them and the DNC folks control CNN and the MSN.
114. The Obama Administration promised Silicon Valley oligarchs the market monopoly on lithium ion batteries and the sabotage of fuel cells in exchange for campaign financing and search engine rigging
115. United States Senators that are supposed to protect us from these deadly products own the stock market assets of them so they protect them and stop the FDA, OSHA, DOT & NHTSA from outlawing them.
116. Tom Steyer is a notorious DNC financier. His partner, Margaret Sullivan ran, the federal USAID agency, USAID sent all of the DNC campaign financiers in Silicon Valley a federal ‘report’ from USAID that said there was “A TRILLION DOLLARS OF LITHIUM IN AFGHANISTAN” and promised to give those lithium mines, EXCLUSIVELY, to the Silicon Valley venture capitalists if they funded and web search manipulated the election for Obama to take over the White House. We have the documents proving this. In other words, a re-up of the Afghan War was caused by Elon Musk and it killed American soldiers so that Musk could buy more mansions and trophy wives.
117. Alkaline, NiCAD and hundreds of other battery chemistries DO NOT have all of these problems but Lithium Ion batteries get a monopoly because of politician insider trading ownerships.
118. Tesla Motors has caused far more deaths and injuries than the world generally knows about.
119. A recent fire on U.S. Highway 101 near Mountain View, CA, burned the driver alive and killed him.
120. In Florida two kids died in a Tesla, burned alive, screaming in agony.
121. A man died in agony in a Tesla crash in Malibu that set Malibu Canyon on fire.
122. A young woman, at the start of life, and her boyfriend were burned alive in their crashed Tesla.
123. There are many more deaths and crashes than you have seen in the Main Stream News (MSN) The deaths and the cover-ups are endless.
124. Senators Dianne Feinstein, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris and their associates own the stock in Tesla Motors and/or it’s suppliers and mining companies and they cover-up and halt investigations and laws designed to save the public. They, and their crony’s, spend over $1B a year to shill and troll hype about lithium ion batteries and cover-up the dangers.
125. Lithium ion EVs are more prone to battery fires. Experts say that their lithium-ion batteries can fuel hotter fires that release toxic fumes and are more difficult to put out.
126. Lithium ion fires keep reigniting which explains why it takes so long and requires copious amounts of water or foam (it is an electric fire, after all) to smother the flames.
127. Tesla employee Bernard Tse and his team warned Elon Musk about these dangers in 2008 and they got fired and/or warned to “say nothing” by Musk.
128. Three top Tesla engineers died in a plane crash next to Tesla offices in San Carlos after two of them agreed to become whistle-blowers.
129. The DNC bosses, Congress people and federal executives own the stock in lithium, Solar and EV markets and use kickbacks from those markets (Especially via convoluted campaign finance laundering via Elon Musk) to finance the DNC.
130. The DNC bosses and Musk use character assassination as their main political tool against any member of the public who speaks out against their felony stock market scams and PizzaGate-like scandals. The Harvey Weinstein reports by Ronan Farrow show that they have teams of hired goons that they pay to destroy people’s lives. They use Black Cube, Mossad, In-Q-Tel, Stratfor, Gawker Media, Gizmodo Media, Media Matters, David Brock, Sid Blumenthal, NY Times, Google servers, Facebook servers, Podesta Group, Perkins Coie, Covington & Burling and a host of “media assassins”.
131. Musk’s “cabin boy”: Jared Birchell, runs around covering up Musk crimes all day
132. Gawker and Gizmodo Media set-up the attack stories and, in paid partnership with Google, Google kicks their attack links around the globe, in front of 8 Billion people, forever. Google locks the attack articles of its enemies on the front top search results of Google search results forever, on purpose! Google and Musk are partners-in-crime.
133. Larry Page steals technology for Google and Musk meets with Larry Page to advise him on which technologies to steal and how to bypass FEC laws.
134. Musk has exceeded FEC campaign finance limits by billions of dollars via “in-kind” services.
135. Reports at https://www.propublica.org prove some of these assertions
136. Reports at https://www.transparency.org prove some of these assertions
137. Reports at https://www.icij.org prove some of these assertions
138. Reports at http://londonworldwide.com  prove some of these assertions
139. Reports at https://stopelonfromfailingagain.com prove some of these assertions
140. Reports at  https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-24/tesla-slams-tree-florida-bursting-flames-and-killing-driver prove some of these assertions
141. Reports at Elon Musk is a total fraud – nypost.com prove some of these assertions
142. Reports at Elon Musk is a total fraud: Truth about Tesla billionaire exposed prove some of these assertions
143. Reports at Elon Musk Passes the Hat Again on Capitol Hill… And in China prove some of these assertions
144. Reports at About Elon Musk – A WASHINGTON DC ORGANIZED CRIME prove some of these assertions
145. Reports at Mark Spiegel: Elon Musk is ‘a pathological liar’ prove some of these assertions
146. Reports at https://nationalnewsnetwork.net/ prove some of these assertions
147. Reports at http://www.videonet111.com prove some of these assertions
148. MUSK’S SPACEX COMPANY Will have all of it’s satellites destroyed in moments as soon as China gets pissed off:  https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/02/12/asia-pacific/chinas-space-debris-cleanup-may-cover-story-arms-u-s-satellites-pentagon/
149. WE HAVE ASKED THE FBI, DOJ, OSC, SEC, FTC, GAO, U.S. CONGRESS, AND OTHERS, TO INVESTIGATE AND PROSECUTE MUSK AND HIS CRONY OPERATION!
150. ELON MUSK’S PAID-FOR MEDIA SHILLS COVER UP HIS CORRUPTION AND PUSH PUFF-STORIES ABOUT MUSK. NEVER TRUST THEM TO BE ANYTHING BUT BIASED PROPAGANDA OUTLETS. MANY OF THEM OWN TESLA STOCK: Electrek, Google, Facebook, CNN, Huffington Post, Dianne Feinstein’s PR office, Nancy Pelosi, Steven Chu, MSNBC, PayPal, KPIX-TV, San Jose Mercury News, Any Hearst owned entity, The SF Chronicle, Motley Fool, Green Car Congress, The executive staff of the DNC, The NY Times, etc.
151. We saw Elon Musk commit crimes and we saw the Obama White House cover-up those crimes.We, and our associates, worked for Bright Automotive, Zap Electric, Aptera, Eco Motors, XPV, The United States Department of Energy and the federal Office of Management and Budget and Tesla Motors itself.Americans have an expectation that their tax dollars will be used in a fair and legal manner and not to pay off crony campaign financiers like Elon Musk.
152. Americans have an expectation that fair market competition will decide which companies get to live or die and that no campaign financiers gets to order the White House to produce the death or success decision about any American business. Elon Musk’s operation exists entirely because of criminal corruption and all of his companies must be shut down by federal law enforcement.
153. For nearly a decade, the U.S. Department of Energy has refused to comply with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for copies of Tesla Motors entire D.O.E. funding application documents. Former D.O.E. employees have shredded copies of those documents in order to keep them from being exposed to the public and the media. Why would they do that? Because those documents reveal felony criminal fraud by Tesla Motors, federal violations of the Section 136 law requirements and manipulations of the “hard-wiring” of the entire D.O.E. program. Those documents, which we have seen (and some Senate staff have private copies of) prove that, in a side-by-side comparison with all other applicants, the Tesla application was manipulation, rigged, false-reviewed and crony-advanced in order to pay-off certain campaign financiers and damage their competitors.
154. Demand that the U.S. Department of Energy stop breaking the law and comply with the FOIA requests to stop hiding the incriminating evidence in the Tesla files. Demand that the public be shown the original paper and not the later, “doctored” versions.
155. We saw Elon Musk operate an entirely illegal and unethical program based on State and Federal corruption. We told this, in writing and in person to the U.S. Attorney General: Eric Holder, who then quit his job after we reported these facts to him.
156. We reported that Elon Musk lied about vast number of dangers of the lithium ion chemistry he was using. Nothing was done.
157. We reported that our associates at the Department of Energy were having their safety reports on lithium ion danger suppressed. Nothing was done.
158. We reported that Elon Musk’s credit rating and financial records were fraudulent and amounted to “cooking the books”. Nothing was done.
159. We reported bribes paid by Musk’s lobbyists and associated to government officials in order to grease the skids for his crony payola. Nothing was done.
160. We reported that Goldman Sachs and Tesla Motors were operating a stock fraud pump-and-dump scam to manipulate Elon Musk’s stock holdings. Nothing was done.
161. We reported over a hundred illegal and corrupt actions by Elon Musk and his mob of Silicon Valley gangsters. Nothing was done.
162. If you have an ounce of morality, then you will not want to help Musk & Tesla profit from the crony political corruption that created them. Musk exists because he bribes politicians & acts as an illegal campaign financing conduit.
163. DOT/NHTSA has covered up years of reports about an acceleration surge issue that can suddenly crash your Tesla into walls and drive it off cliffs. It is either a known hacking attack or the effect of WiFi on Tesla electronics. Either can kill you.
164. Musk & Tesla are pure evil & exist because of hyper-corruption. You don’t want to contribute to their evil or be part of it in any way. You are funding evil & supporting criminal corruption by buying a Tesla or any Elon Musk owned product like Solar City, Tesla, Space X, Hyperloop, etc.!
165. Elon Musk spent more money, than any other car company in history, to do the exact same things that any other car has done, or could do, for 20 times less money. Musk’s Tesla was $100,000.00 over budget, per car, at the time that Musk was handed his crony Dept. of Energy froms by Steven Chu. Musk has no clue how to operate a car company.
166. In one lawsuit it is noted that: “…Plaintiff and Tesla both applied for funds at the same time, in the same funding cycle in the same program. Tesla had the historically epic number of horrific issues listed below, which were known to DOE at the time of application, and Plaintiffs had NONE of these issues. How can any court, or rational person, believe that Plaintiffs were not intentionally bypassed, targeted and damaged for political reasons while Tesla was simultaneously approved for political reasons, when the comparative metrics between the two applicants prove the largest merit disparity in the entire recorded history of the U.S. Department of Energy….the singular, and only, review criteria used by Department of Energy officials was: WHICH ONE BRIBED THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE GROUP FOR BARACK OBAMA?!”; Thus proving that Tesla exists because of organized-crime level political corruption.
167. Elon Musk’s self-driving “autopilot” feature, which keeps crashing and failing, is his attempt to scam taxpayer cash from Dept. of Transportation and Dept. of Energy public funds. He is only trying to do it to get more free federal cash.
168. The inventor of lithium ion batteries has confessed that lithium ion batteries blow up eventually. He says that deadly dendrites plague lithium-ion battery technology. The dendrites accumulate as part of the standard charging and recharging cycle and eventually cause a short circuit that often results in a smoldering or burning battery. These dendrites are destined to eventually blow up most Tesla cars and many electronic devices using lithium ion!
169. The CIA’s software designed to take over any Tesla on Earth and kill the driver, passengers and bystanders has been released in the wild and every hacker on Earth can now easily get a copy of it and kill you in your Tesla!
170. Ex-employees have leaked faked financial records, evidence of massive click-farm fake social media manipulation and evidence of unreported deaths and accidents. They say that most Tesla’s have one kind of defect or another.
171. If you read about the dirty deeds and cocaine dealings with the In-Q-Tel airplanes called “Cocaine 1” & “Cocaine 2”, & the corruption behind the company called In-Q-Tel & Musk’s software programmer who ran “The Silk Road” drug & murder service then you must be concerned that many In-Q-Tel people work for Musk. Why does Musk need dirty druggies & spies on his payroll unless he is running covert drug and business spying activities?
172. Ex-employees, Gawker writers and gay lawyers from Covington & Burling have leaked stories that Elon Musk, Reid Hoffman, Larry Page are “butt buddies”.
173. Musk is anti-American and Anti-Worker Rights and has been caught flying in H1-B cheap offshore labor and exploiting immigrants for his deadly profits. Musk hates unions and worker rights efforts.
174. Elon Musk gets the Cobalt chemical to make his lithium ion batteries from slave trade and blood-money corruption in the Congo!
175. The lithium ion batteries that Musk uses also blow up when they naturally encounter Low Energy Nuclear (LENR) effects in the ambient environment. Millions of chemicals don’t blow up from LENR’d but lithium ion does!
176. If you are a Democrat then know that Elon Musk cost you the Hillary Clinton campaign because of his payola schemes. If you are a Republican, know that Elon Musk is the epitome of the worst form of DNC crony corruption you ever saw!
177. Musk bribed California politicians to give him hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer dollars & resources he never earned or worked for. He only got those crony payola perks handed to him because he operated as an illicit front for corrupt campaign financing for Dianne Feinstein, Jerry Brown, Harry Reid, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
178. Multiple parties have filed “Demands For The Arrest of Elon Musk” with the FBI, DOJ, AG, FTC, SEC and other law enforcement agencies. It is not likely that Musk, or his companies will survive a full investigation.
179. Tesla and Solyndra sit on the same land in Fremont, CA. Solyndra was raided by the FBI for corruption. Tesla SHOULD be raided by the FBI for corruption. Both companies had kick-back crony payola schemes with Senator Dianne Feinstein. She owned the land, lease, HR, construction company and supplier interests and stock for both companies in one of the most massive conflict-of-interest crony financing schemes in U.S. history. Elon Musk and the Feinsteins are corruption partners.
180. People who see you in a Tesla think of you as a “Tone Deaf Douchebag”, “Tesla Tool!”, “Arrogant Prick”, “Ostentatious Obama Oaf”, “Sheep”, “Mindless Yuppie Scum”, “Misogynistic Silicon Valley Clone”, “Self-promoting Elitist Douche”, “Fake News Reading Main Stream Boob”, “Naive Idiot” or other bad things.
181. Elon Musk is one of the main financiers behind Barack Obama & Hillary Clinton, both of whom have been charged with corruption. Musk endlessly tweets lies & “…No I didn’t do those bad things” BS but nobody else supports him.
182. Tesla financial records are “cooked” in a fraudulent manner to make the stock market valuation of Tesla a falsely manipulated factor. Musk uses “pre-orders”, by his own investors, to fake sales and wrote emails to customers asking them to put small deposits down so he could book them as fully paid sales in one of a large number of stock and loan valuation frauds. Musk and his investors practice stock market skims, pump-and-dumps and Flash Boy manipulations.
183. Lithium ion batteries are blowing up, starting fires &, generally, destroying people’s homes, cars, electronics & physical health. Boeing was ordered to stop flying the 787 Dreamliner because it’s Lithium ion batteries are catching fire spontaneously. A group of silicon valley venture capitalists forced/leveraged the government to buy & pay for these specific batteries, that they have stock in, in order to benefit their profit margins. Other batteries don’t have these problems. They knew about the dangers from day one, but put greed ahead of safety. There are thousands & thousands of reports of spontaneous lithium ion fires but the VC’s who back lithium ion pay to keep this information hushed up. Millions of these batteries have been recalled for fire risk. The VC’s tried to push as many as they could before they got caught. Now they are caught. These VC’s & the Senators they bribed own stock in lithium mining companies too.
184. Tesla Motors has filed a patent which states the following , THESE ARE TESLA MOTORS WORDS warning about a crisis, the level of which they never disclosed to the consumer: “Thermal runaway is of major concern since a single incident can lead to significant property damage &, in some circumstances, bodily harm or loss of life. When a battery undergoes thermal runaway, it typically emits a large quantity of smoke, jets of flaming liquid electrolyte, & sufficient heat to lead to the combustion & destruction of materials in close proximity to the cell. If the cell undergoing thermal runaway is surrounded by one or more additional cells as is typical in a battery pack, then a single thermal runaway event can quickly lead to the thermal runaway of multiple cells which, in turn, can lead to much more extensive collateral damage. Regardless of whether a single cell or multiple cells are undergoing this phenomenon, if the initial fire is not extinguished immediately, subsequent fires may be caused that dramatically expand the degree of property damage. For example, the thermal runaway of a battery within an unattended laptop will likely result in not only the destruction of the laptop, but also at least partial destruction of its surroundings, e.g., home, office, car, laboratory, etc. If the laptop is on-board an aircraft, for example within the cargo hold or a luggage compartment, the ensuing smoke & fire may lead to an emergency landing or, under more dire conditions, a crash landing. Similarly, the thermal runaway of one or more batteries within the battery pack of a hybrid or electric vehicle may destroy not only the car, but may lead to a car wreck if the car is being driven or the destruction of its surroundings if the car is parked”. See http://whoiselonmusk.com for more…
185. Tesla’s own staff, & every fire department, have now admitted that once a lithium ion fire gets started in a Tesla, that it is impossible to extinguish burning lithium ion material. This is Telsa’s own words in THEIR patent filing, (You can look it up online) saying that the risk is monumental. Tesla has 6800 lithium ion batteries, any one of which can “go thermal”, start a chain reaction and blow up all of the rest of the 6800+ deadly batteries! Tesla drivers have been burned alive in thermal globs of flaming lithium ion, plastics & metal. Bystanders have heard their horrific screams of unutterable pain & terror as they were burned alive! Tesla fires can’t be extinguished & the bodies are burned into “unrecognizable lumps of charred flesh”, according to fireman.
186. Lithium Ion batteries “go thermal” in peoples pockets, in your notebook, especially in a Tesla & Fisker car. There are tens of thousands of articles documenting this & there is a cover-up by the VC’s that fund these things to keep this fact out-of-sight. Making Lithium Ion batteries poisons the workers who make them. It is a dangerous product that is covered-up by the Obama Administration. Panasonic knows that these batteries are deadly.
187. Tesla only exists to exploit Elon Musk’s briberies. The lithium ion batteries blow up when they get: wet, hot, bumped, over-charged, struck by energy fields, exposed to air or squashed. Lithium ion batteries poison the Earth & that they poison & kill the workers that make them. Lithium ion batteries come from war profiteering in Afghan & Bolivian corruption
188. Panasonic is Elon Musk’s partner. Panasonic is one of the most corrupt companies in the world. Panasonic has been charged, on multiple continents with: Product dumping, bribery, collusion, price fixing, anti-trust law violations, racketeering, worker abuse, toxic poisoning of workers, & other crimes. It is no wonder that Elon Musk & Panasonic are partners. Tata Motors executive Karl Slym was killed for exposing this fact.
189. Your tax dollars were stolen in order to make Tesla Motors, as part of a political financing kick-back scam. In other words, part of your paycheck was taken away from you in order to buy hookers, rent-boys & private jets for Musk & company.
190. Tesla’s are forged in criminal corruption, so anybody who drives a Tesla must be either ignorant, a weasel or one of the corrupt. The whole world now knows all of the facts in this list so you can never plead ignorance to these crimes.
191. Telsa’s have a huge amount of highly documented defects. The defects are so extensive that Tesla made buyers sign confidentiality agreements to try to hide how messed up their cars are.
192. Tesla’s have killed more people than the main-stream news has reported. The full Tesla death-list is covered up.
193. Musk lied about why he wanted to make electric cars, when, in fact, he actually poisons the environment because Tesla investors wanted to exploit toxic minerals & materials which can’t be recycled in a clean manner
194. No other electric car has been so mundane, & yet had so many problems with it, since the electric car was first sold in the 1800’s. There is nothing “novel” or “amazing” about the Tesla aside from dime store parlor tricks for PR hype.
195. More drunks have crashed Tesla’s, than any other per capita car in the world, per volume of cars made
196. Elon Musk’s co-founders, investors, partners, wives, investors, suppliers & employees have sued him for being a fraud &, essentially, called him an “asshole” in court records.
197. Elon Musk lied on this Department of Energy funding application and the Obama Administration refuses to allow any federal employees or witnesses to testify to these facts in public due to the devastating potential results of these facts.
198. More owners of Tesla’s have been found to cheat on their taxes, & be involved in abuse-based divorces, than almost any other car brand owner. Tesla owners are bad people who rationalize their poor life choices. Owning a Tesla is a red-flag for a tax audit!
199. Elon Musk will lie, cheat & steal in order to self-aggrandize & glorify his egotistical mania. Musk has been documented engaging in over 100 lies which were later proven to be false. He has spent tens of millions of dollars to buy fake news about himself on Twitter, Facebook & Google because he is such a mentally disturbed ego-maniac.
200. None of Elon Musk’s companies would exist if not for taxpayer funded handouts given to him by corrupt politicians in exchange for illegal campaign finance deals with him & his investors.
201. Google, & Tesla, who are financial & political partners, have both been caught spying on consumers & manipulating Internet data in order to cover-up their complicity in huge political corruption & kick-back deals
202. Musk took U.S. taxpayer dollars from the government & then hired cheap off-shore labor & fired U.S. Union workers & domestic workers. He lied to & screwed the NUMMI workers that were working at the Fremont plant.
203. Musk has put over 18 surveillance devices in the Tesla. Anybody can hack those devices & monitor you. WORSE YET, foreign agents have hacked the Tesla & taken over the controls & driven Tesla’s into bystanders & over cliffs.
204. When Erick Strickland was head of the NHTSA he was confronted about DOT safety cover-ups of the Tesla to protect Obama. He quit 48 hours later. The DOT safety cover-ups to protect the Obama campaign finance payola scheme continue to this day. Obama’s Gibbs, Emanual, Plouffe, Axelrod and Carney quit within a week of being threatened with exposure.
205. Elon Musk paid some of the largest bribes in the history of China, facilitated by Dianne Feinstein and her Chinese spy connections, in order to get his China factory opened.
206. Tesla’s have had a large number of recalls but Elon Musk refuses to call them “recalls”. Tesla’s have had multiple recalls for SEVERE safety dangers. DOT has been told this, in writing, for years, but wont take action in order to protect Obama.
207. Elon Musk is a bullshit artist who has no original ideas & wears black-turtle neck shirts (like Elizabeth Homes) to try to create a “cult” around himself & convince the world that he is a “Jesus-like” figure when, in fact, he is a clinical sociopath.
208. Tesla is a severe public safety hazard that has been systematically covered up by corrupt politicians.
209. Large numbers of Ex-CIA staff and In-Q-Tel spy staff work for Musk. Why does he need spies to build cars?
210. Tesla Motors batteries were promoted by those who wished to exploit the Afghanistan War for personal profit by controlling the Afghan lithium mining fields. Kleiner Perkins and Draper Fisher hyped the “…trillions of $ of lithium in Afghanistan.”
211. Tesla Motors batteries blow up on their own because their chemistry causes them to be naturally defective.
212. Tesla Motors batteries blow up when they get wet because their chemistry is activated by water to make them explode.
213. Tesla Motors batteries fires cannot be put out by any common fire-fighting resources.
214. Tesla Motors batteries set themselves on fire.
215. Per Federal MSDS disclosure documents, Tesla Motors batteries emit cancer-causing vapors when they burn.
216. Tesla Motors Vehicles toxicity poison bystanders, nearby vehicular passengers, airline passengers in planes carrying said batteries in their holds, & environments where such incidents occur.
217. Tesla Motors batteries blow up when bumped by the same level of car incident that would, otherwise, only dent a normal car bumper.
218. In an accident, when a Tesla rolls over, molten metal & plastic can drip on & burn the occupants alive.
219. Tesla has multiple sexual harassment and unsafe work-place lawsuits against the company.
220. Per MSDS documents, Tesla Motors batteries emit brain damaging chemicals when they burn
221. Tesla is a stock pumping scam to profiteering on stock market peak manipulation at the expense of taxpayers.
222. Per MSDS documents, Tesla Motors batteries emit chemicals, burning, or not, that can damage an unborn fetus within the mother
223. Per MSDS documents, Tesla Motors batteries emit chemicals that can cause lung damage.
224. Per MSDS documents, Tesla Motors batteries emit chemicals that can cause liver damage.
225. Per published lawsuits & news reports, the factories that make Tesla Motors batteries have been charged with the deaths, & potentially fatal illness, of over 1000 workers & the poisoning of nearby towns.
226. Tesla Motors batteries become even more dangerous over time, particularly when tasked by electric transportation systems like Hover-boards & Tesla’s. The chemistry in a lithium ion battery changes to become more unstable over time.
227. Tesla Motors batteries were never designed to be used in automobiles. Tesla used non-automotive batteries in one of the most dangerous configurations possible.
228. Tesla Motors occupants experience higher EMF radiation exposure than gasoline vehicle occupants.
229. Elon Musk’s Space X vehicles & Tesla Motors vehicles have both had a higher-than-average number of explosions. This has caused outside experts to doubt Musk’s ability to place safety considerations over his need for hyped-up PR.
230. Leaked Sandia National Labs & FAA research videos dramatically demonstrate the unstoppable, horrific, “re-percussive accelerating domino-effect” explosive fire effect of the Tesla Motors batteries.
231. Tesla’s own “Superchargers” & home 3-prong chargers have set Tesla’s, homes & businesses on fire
232. Consumer rights groups contacted Erick Strickland, the head of the NHTSA, & charged him with a cover-up. He quit days later. The NHTSA then issued a safety investigation request to Tesla Motors, which would have more publicly exposed these dangers, but the safety investigation was never under-taken due to White House requests & lobbyist bribes, from Tesla, which got the investigation shut down.
233. NEPA regulations for the Tesla NUMMI factory in California & the Nevada Tesla “Gigafactory” have been violated relative to environmental safety standards.
234. Tesla Motors vehicles are not “Factory Built” “like Ford” builds cars, as Tesla professes. They are hand built in small volumes & subjected to numerous defects. Blogs have documented hundreds of defects, as listed by Tesla owners. Tesla has lost at least one LEMON CAR LAWSUIT for defective manufacturing.
235. Tesla’s “showrooms” are often “pop-up” retail storefronts that are in tight-proximity retail centers, putting it’s neighbors at risk of total loss from fire damage.
236. Tesla Motors vehicles have been hacked & taken over. Their doors, steering, listening devices & navigation have been taken over by outside parties. Multiple Tesla have suddenly swerved off the road, over cliffs & into other vehicles, killing bystanders & Tesla drivers.
237. Three Tesla top engineers & two competing senior executives, all of whom had whistle-blown on Tesla, who were in perfect health one day, suddenly died mysteriously the next day.
238. Multiple employees, founders, investors, marital partners, suppliers & others have sued Tesla Motors, &/or it’s senior executives for fraud. Musk had nothing to do with creating Tesla. He ran a hostile take-over of Tesla from the founders.
239. In addition to suing him, many of his former staff & partners have described Musk as an “Arrogant Prick”.
240. Main-Stream Media (MSM) have agreed not to provide news coverage of the deadly defects of the Tesla because the MSM are owned by the same politicians who own Tesla Motors. It is now legal to sue The New York Times for hiding these deadly defects, though, particularly if your family member was injured or killed because they covered-up the danger for political reasons.
241. If you think the above bullet-points are bad there are over a 1000 more. Find the book “Is Elon Musk A Fraud” online or visit https://stopelonfromfailingagain.com/ or thousands of other sites that expose the truth about Musk & Tesla!
242. BANKRUPT MUSK – NO CASH FOR CRONY CORRUPTION. Print this out & freely re-post it on blogs & social media. Post this on bulletin boards. Put this on the windshield of every Tesla you find. Print this out & hand these out in front of every Tesla dealership: Nobody can stop you from handing these out, it is your U.S. Constitutional First Amendment Right! Pass the word! We are prepared to back up every single fact on here at any public meeting with the FBI, Congress, FTC, GAO, SEC or before a Federal Special Prosecutor.
243. The crash of a Tesla Model X through the home of South Korean singer and actor Ji Chang Son. The crash ended with the nose of the vehicle in Ji Chang Son’s living room after the Tesla malfunctioned. Hundreds of such Tesla crashes have occurred, resulting in the deaths and injuries of Tesla owners, passengers, bystanders, oncoming drivers and others.
244. Following accusations by a Korean celebrity that a Tesla car spontaneously drove through a wall, the carmaker has replied that the crash was “entirely due to the man’s horrible driving” in an ongoing effort, by Tesla, to steer the blame away from Tesla faulty engineering Actor and singer Son Ji-chang (identified as Ji Chang Son in court documents) claimed he was parking his Tesla Model X SUV when the vehicle suddenly lurched forward into his living room.
245. In a lawsuit filed last week in California, Son claimed that the crash was due to “sudden unintended acceleration” and sought class-action status with other Model X owners. In a nod to the car’s ability to sense and avoid crashes, the lawsuit also hinted that the Model X should not be allowed take actions that the car “knows will result in the collision with a fixed object.”
246. In June, another California-based Model X owner, Puzant Ozbag, similarly claimed that his Model X spontaneously accelerated through a parking lot and into a wall. A special prosecutor is needed to investigate Tesla due to the huge number of cover-ups, by Tesla and the Obama Administration, to protect camapign financier Elon Musk. Jeff Sessions needs to hire a lawyer from outside the government appointed by Sessions as attorney general or, in the United States, by Congress to investigate a government official for misconduct while in office. A reasoning for such an appointment is that the governmental branch or agency may have political connections to those it might be asked to investigate. Inherently, this creates a conflict of interest and a solution is to have someone from outside the department lead the investigation. The term “special prosecutor” may have a variety of meanings from one country to the next, from one government branch to the next within the same country, and within different agencies within each government branch. Critics of the use of special prosecutors argue that these investigators act as a “fourth branch” to the government because they are not subject to limitations in spending, nor do they have deadlines to meet.
247. Attorneys carrying out special prosecutor functions in either federal or state courts of the United States are typically appointed ad hoc with representation limited to one case or a delineated series of cases that implicate compelling governmental interests, such as: Fraud (SEC, Complex, Cybercrime, Mortgages), Public Corruption, Money Laundering & Asset Forfeiture, Civil Rights, Racketeering Across State lines, Environmental Protection, National Security, Tax & Bankruptcy, Organized Crime, or International cases where the US is a party).[1] Special prosecutors in courts of the United States may either be appointed formally by one of the three branches of government in a criminal proceeding, or when dictated by federal law or regulation, or informally in civil proceedings, and also by one of the three branches of government, or by a non-governmental entity to prosecute alleged unlawful conduct by government agents. When appointed by the judicial branch to investigate and, if justified, seek indictments in a particular judicial branch case, the attorney is called special prosecutor.[2] When appointed/hired particularly by a governmental branch or agency to investigate alleged misconduct within that branch or agency, the attorney is called independent counsel.[3] When appointed/hired by the state or political subdivision to assist in a particular judicial branch case when the public interest so requires, the attorney is called special counsel.[3] When appointed/hired by an organization, corporation, person or other non-governmental entity to investigate and, if justified, seek indictments against one or more government officials for acts committed under color of law, the attorney may be called special counsel or special prosecut. The term is sometimes used as a synonym for independent counsel, but under the former law authorizing the independent counsel, the appointment was made by a special panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The Ethics in Government Act expired in 1999, and was effectively replaced by Department of Justice regulation 28 CFR Part 600, under which Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald was appointed to look into the Plame affair. The Tesla Motors and Elon Musk Case requires a Special Prosecutor.
248. ELON MUSK AND TESLA FACE CRIMINAL FRAUD CHARGES BY FEDS! MUSK FINALLY EXPOSED!
249.  SEC subpoenas TESLA over Musk tweets…
250. Whistleblower posts ‘flawed cars’ details…
251.  Elon Musk’s Incredible Smoke And Mirrors Dance. Elon Musk’s untraceable money laundering and political bribery scam has now been exposed. It is called an “Invisible Bridge”. It is the way that covert funds move through a secret conduit of close associates and family members. Elon Musk is at the head of the conduit and his mother, brother and associates Tim Draper, Steve Jurvetson, and George Soros round out the other tentacles. With operational links through Wells Fargo Bank, Silicon Valley Bank and Goldman Sachs, the scheme is perfected corruption. The “bridge” uses a combination of fake tax evasion charities and business assets, passes through Senator’s pockets and is never visible to the FBI, the FEC and the SEC unless they have very good agents assigned to the matter.
252. NTSB, DOJ, SEC and FEC have been blocked from action by DNC lobbyists.
253. The overt and arrogant Musk misdeeds have now become “obvious and RICO-violating…”
254. He is protected by Senators Reid, Harris, Pelosi and Feinstein. They are beneficiaries of the scam. Musk’s self promoting, narcissistic, multi-billion dollar, self-aggrandizing PR hype. Elon Musk exists because he bribed DNC politicians including Obama, Clinton and Senators Feinstein, Reid, Boxer, Harris, Spier and Pelosi to give him free taxpayer cash and government resources from the Department of Energy and the California political tax pool. This is proven when you follow-the-money and the insider trading, stock ownership and crony payola kick-backs.
255. He is protected by the Clinton and Obama organizations along with most of the DNC. He finances these politicians via this scheme.
256. The U.S. Dept of Energy (DOE) has been covering-up organized crime activities at DOE in which DOE funds are being used as a slush-fund to pay off DNC campaign financiers and to pay for Fusion-GPS attacks on Silicon Valley business competitors.
257. DNC campaign financiers and DOE staff share stock market holdings with each other under family trusts, shell corporations and layered Goldman Sachs accounts. The deal was: Obama funds Tesla, Musk conduits campaign funds to Obama, top Obama staff profit off of insider Musk stocks.
258. Elon Musk is a criminal, a mobster, an asshole, a balding fake-hair wearing, plastic surgery-addicted, bi-sexual douchebag, woman-abusing, sex addicted, tax evader.
259. Musk exploits poor people and child slaves in the Congo and Afghanistan to mine his lithium and Cobalt. Look up this phrase on the top search engines: “child labor electric car batteries”
260. Musk spends billions per year to hire Russian trolls, fake blogger fan-boys and buy fake news self-glory look-at-me articles about himself. Musk thinks he is the ‘Jesus’ of Silicon Valley and he will do anything to make the public think so. Musk is insecure because his father was abusive and his “trophy wife” Mother is overbearing so he developed sociopath-like mental issues.
261. Musk has been professionally diagnosed as a ‘psychotic narcissist.
262. Musk uses shell companies and trust funds to self-deal, evade the law and hide his bribes and stock market insider trading. His brother ran Solar City and is now under federal investigation for securities fraud.
263. A huge number of Tesla drivers, per capita, have been killed; pedestrians and oncoming drivers have also been killed, and Musk covers it up.
264. The DNC and the MSM refuse to allow any articles about Musk’s crimes to be printed because they benefit from Musk’s crimes.
265. VC’s Tim Draper and Steve Jurvetson are so fanatical about not being embarrassed from a Tesla bankruptcy that they will pump the TSLA stock and threaten anybody who might disclose the Musk misdeeds.
266. Peter Thiel, a Musk ‘boyfriend” also protects Musk. Musk, and his cronies, use Palantir, Google and related software to scan the entire internet every few minutes for any occurrence of the words: “Musk”, “Tesla” or “Tesla Fire”. They send trolls and fake bloggers (Many of them Russian) to put pro-Musk comments on the comments section of any blogs or articles discussing those topics and try to flood out the truth about Musk. In EVERY blog that you read that mentions ‘Musk’, at least 1/3 of the comments have been placed their by Musk’s paid shills.
267. There are no “Tesla Fan Boys”. All of the fanatic Tesla comments on the internet are Musk’s, Thiel’s, Jurvetson’s and Draper’s fake fanboy trolls. Musk, himself, stays up late at night pretending to be a ‘Tesla Fan Boy’on blogs.
268. Main Stream DNC-biased News organizations who refuse to cover the story reveal themselves as shills for Musk
269. The Silicon Valley Mafia promotes Musk as a “Tech God” leader but, in reality Musk is the same kind of “Leader” as Charles Manson, Jim Jones, David Koresh, Swami Rajneesh and Al Capone.
270. His own people have sued him for fraud and lies once they realized that Musk-ism and Scientology had so much in common.
271. The ‘Silicon Valley Mafia; cartel of frat boy sociopath venture capitalists like Steve Jurvetson, Tim Draper, Eric Schmidt, et al; threaten those who do not support the cult of Tesla or their political candidates.
272. Musk holds the Silicon Valley record for getting sued for fraud by his investors, wives, former partners, employees, suppliers and co-founders.
273. Elon Musk has gone out of his way to hire hundreds of ex-CIA and In-Q-Tel staff and assign them to “dirty tricks teams” to attack his competitors and elected officials who Musk hates.
274. Musk and his culture are being sued for abuse to women and blacks and the Unions hate him for lying to them.
275. https://stopelonfromfailingagain.com reveals even more Musk lies.
276. Musk never founded his companies. He took Tesla away from the founder: Marty, in a hostile take-over!
277. Musk’s “Starlink” satellites are domestic spy and political manipulation tools – never get your internet from anything SpaceX has launched. SpaceX is entirely a domestic spy operation.
278. Musk’s “Mars” scheme is just a PR distraction to keep the news from looking too close at SPACEX domestic spying satellites.
279. The same kind of EMF radiation proven to cause cancer from cell phones exists in massive amounts in a Tesla.
280. Musk can’t fix a car or build a rocket and has almost no mechanical skills.
281. If you pull a report of every VIN# of every Tesla ever built and cross reference that with insurance, repair and lawsuit records you will find that the “per volume” fire, crash, death and defect rate is THE WORST of any car maker in history! Musk’s lobbyists have bribed DOT and NHTSA to stall safety inspections.
282. NO COMPLETE UNCOMPROMISING SAFETY REPORT ON TESLA CARS HAS EVER BEEN PUBLISHED but we have a copy of a hushed up report that would put Tesla out of business.
283. Musk’s ‘Autopilot’ system is a scam to get government cash BUT IT NEVER WORKS. The Tesla ‘Autopilot’ has crashed into police cars, pedestrians, swamps and driven owners over cliffs.
284. Musk is a lying con artist and partners with Goldman Sachs to rig the stock market. Sachs has a dedicated team of 18 men who rig stocks and valuation bumps for Musk.
285. The “Silk Road” Cocaine and Murder-For-Hire website was created at Musk’s SpaceX
286. Musk’s In-Q-Tel staff ran two transport planes filled with drugs; listed as “Cocaine 1” on FAA records.
287. Senators Dianne Feinstein, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris and their associates own the stock in Tesla Motors and/or it’s suppliers and mining companies. That is why they criminally help cover-up investigations of Tesla!
288. All of this was reported, in writing, to James Comey, Patricia Rich and David Johnson at the FBI.
289. Tesla and Solyndra sit on the same land and share staff, contracts and lobbying. California politicians own parts of both companies.
290. Musk took over Tesla Motors in a hostile take-over in order to exploit lithium, cobalt and other mining corruption deals for his business partners.
291. The ‘lithium’ in Musk’s horrifically miss-engineered lithium ion batteries cause wars in the Congo over mining corruption.
292. Afghanistan and Bolivian mobsters benefit from the corrupt mining deals involved with mining lithium and cobalt for Elon Musk’s batteries.
293. Elon Musk opened a factory in China to try to avoid American worker safety laws because all of the labor cheats and safety violations he had engaged in, in America, were catching up to him. He neglected to provide adequate worker safety to quarantine for the coronavirus, though.
294. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries are insider trading-owned by ex-CIA boss Woolsey and DOE Boss Chu and they engaged in extreme conflict-of-interest to help Musk.
295. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries excrete chemicals that mutate fetuses when they burn.
296. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries destroy your brain, lungs and nervous system when they burn.
297. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries kill the factory workers who make them.
298. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries cause Panasonic to be one of the most corrupt companies in the world.
299. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries poison the Earth when disposed of.
300. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries can’t be extinguished by firemen because water makes them explode even more and then explode again hours later.
301. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries have chemical dendrites and deposition massing issues (revealed by X-Ray analysis) which makes them more and more likely to explode as they age.
302. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries poison firemen when they burn.
303. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries are based on criminally corrupt mining schemes like URANIUM ONE.
304. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries have over 61 toxic chemicals in them.
305. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries come from an industry that spends billions on internet shills and trolls that they hire to nay say all other forms of energy
306. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion batteries are insider-trading owned by corrupt U.S. Senators who are running a SAFETY COVER-UP about their dangers.
307. Apple products with lithium ion batteries have been exploding and setting people on fire.
308. Over time the chemical dendrites, or deposits, inside each battery grow worse and increase the chances of explosion as they age – LITHIUM ION BATTERIES BECOME MORE AND MORE LIKELY TO EXPLODE AS TIME GOES ON AND AS THEY AGE. This is not a theory. This is a scientific fact. That is why you hear about more and more lithium batteries catching fire and blowing up. Additionally, scientists also speculate that the increasing presence of low energy nuclear background energy and wifi energy in the environment is making lithium ion batteries explode more often lately. This is upheld by the increasing number of FAA reports about commercial airline cabins suddenly “filling up with toxic smoke” as some lithium ion battery explodes in someones overhead luggage. As commercial jets go higher they lose the protection of the atmosphere and are subjected to more gamma (and other) radiation from overhead. This makes the already unstable lithium ion batteries on board blow up.
309. Tesla owner’s had had more DUI’s, abuse filings in divorce proceedings and crashes than any other car maker PER VOLUME. This makes Tesla the #1 car for douche bags and scummy people.
310. Tesla’s own federal patent filing records confirm that Tesla batteries are as dangerous as this document reports.
311. Political activist George Soros owns part of Tesla Motors so that Soros can help conduit DNC cash.
312. The Obama Administration promised Silicon Valley oligarchs the market monopoly on lithium ion batteries and the sabotage of fuel cells in exchange for campaign financing and search engine rigging.
313. United States Senators that are supposed to protect us from these deadly products own the stock market assets of them so they protect them and stop the FDA, OSHA, DOT & NHTSA from outlawing them.
314. There have been thousands of defect reports filed on Tesla cars.
315. Tom Steyer is a notorious DNC financier. His partner, Margaret Sullivan ran, the federal USAID agency, USAID sent all of the DNC campaign financiers in Silicon Valley a federal ‘report’ from USAID that said there was “A TRILLION DOLLARS OF LITHIUM IN AFGHANISTAN” and promised to give those lithium mines, EXCLUSIVELY, to the Silicon Valley venture capitalists if they funded and web search manipulated the election for Obama to take over the White House. We have the documents proving this. In other words, a re-up of the Afghan War was caused by Elon Musk and it killed American soldiers so that Musk could buy more mansions and trophy wives.
316. If a Tesla battery gets wet it will explode and cause all of the other batteries to explode in a “cascade of explosions”.
317. Water makes Tesla batteries explode.
318. In an accident, when a Tesla rolls over, molten metal & plastic can drip on & burn the occupants alive and seal them in molten metal.
319. Alkaline, NiCAD and hundreds of other battery chemistries DO NOT have all of these problems but Lithium Ion batteries get a monopoly because of politician insider trading owner-ships.
320. Tesla Motors has caused far more deaths and injuries than the world generally knows about.
321. A recent fire on U.S. Highway 101 near Mountain View, CA, burned the driver alive and killed him.
322. In Florida two kids died in a Tesla, burned alive, screaming in agony.
323. A man died in agony in a Tesla crash in Malibu that set Malibu Canyon on fire.
324. A young woman, at the start of life, and her boyfriend were burned alive in their crashed Tesla.
325. There are many more deaths and crashes than you have seen in the Main Stream News (MSN) The deaths and the cover-ups are endless.
326. Senators Dianne Feinstein, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris and their associates own the stock in Tesla Motors and/or it’s suppliers and mining companies and they cover-up and halt investigations and laws designed to save the public.
327. Elon Musk’s Lithium ion battery partners spend over $1B a year to shill and troll hype about lithium ion batteries and cover-up the dangers.
328. Lithium ion EVs are more prone to battery fires.
329. Experts say that their lithium-ion batteries can fuel hotter fires that release toxic fumes and are more difficult to put out. Lithium ion fires keep reigniting which explains why it takes so long and requires copious amounts of water or foam (it is an electric fire, after all) to smother the flames.
330. Tesla employee Bernard Tse and his team warned Elon Musk about these dangers in 2008 and they got fired and/or warned to “say nothing” by Musk.
331. Three top Tesla engineers died in a plane crash next to Tesla offices in San Carlos after two of them agreed to become whistle-blowers. Another whistle-blower has suggested they were killed in a “Boston Brakes” hit-job.
332. The DNC bosses, Congress people and federal executives own the stock in lithium, Solar and EV markets and use kickbacks from those markets (Especially via convoluted campaign finance laundering via Elon Musk) to finance the DNC.
333. The DNC bosses and Musk use character assassination as their main political tool against any member of the public who speaks out against their felony stock market scams and PizzaGate-like scandals. The Harvey Weinstein reports by Ronan Farrow show that they have teams of hired goons that they pay to destroy people’s lives.
334. Musk uses Black Cube, Mossad, In-Q-Tel, Stratfor, Gawker Media, Gizmodo Media, Media Matters, David Brock, Sid Blumenthal, NY Times, Google servers, Facebook servers, Podesta Group, Perkins Coie, Covington & Burling and a host of “media assassins”.
335. Musk buddies: Gawker and Gizmodo Media set-up the attack stories and, in paid partnership with Google, Google kicks their attack links around the globe, in front of 8 Billion people, forever. Google locks the attack articles of its enemies on the front top search results of Google search results forever, on purpose! Google and Musk are partners-in-crime.
336. Larry Page steals technology for Google and Musk meets with Larry Page to advise him on which technologies to steal and how to bypass FEC laws.
337. Musk has exceeded FEC campaign finance limits by billions of dollars via “in-kind” services.
338. Had the full scope of these facts been acted on during the Obama Administration, Barack Obama would have become the first modern sitting President to have been arrested in the White House. Barack Obama was fully aware of these schemes, crony payola deals and corruption crimes and discussed the implementation of these crimes, daily, with Rahm Emanuel, David Plouffe, Steven Rattner, Robert Gibbs, John Podesta, David Axelrod, Eric Holder and Jay Carney in the Oval Office.
339. THIS corruption involves TRILLIONS of dollars of corrupt mining deals, automotive and energy monopolies!
340. THIS is why the federal budget analysis reports are showing TRILLIONS of dollars of ‘untraceable’ losses from the United States Treasury from 2006 up to today!
341. THIS is why a large number of reporters, whistle-blowers and prosecutors suddenly, and mysteriously turned up dead!
342. The company that Elon Musk built to usher in the electric-car future might not have enough cash to make it through the calendar year without stock markets scams being used to keep it alive.
343. Tesla again fell far short of its own production targets for the mass-market Model 3 sedan
344.  Another person died in a crash involving its assisted-driving feature.
345. Musk entered into a public dispute with federal safety regulators.
346. Tesla’s once high-flying stock, buffeted by a downgrade from credit analysts, has dropped 24 percent from its peak in September but Silicon Valley Vc’s will pump it up to save face.
347. No one has raised or spent money the way Elon Musk has; Nor has any other chief executive officer of a public company made a bankruptcy joke on Twitter at a time when so much seemed to be unraveling.
348. Tesla is going through money so fast that, without additional financing, there is now a genuine risk that the 15-year-old company could run out of cash in 2018. The company burns through more than $6,500 every minute, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Free cash flow—the amount of cash a company generates after accounting for capital expenditures—has been negative for five consecutive quarters. That will be a key figure to watch when Tesla reports earnings May 2. Read the full story here: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-tesla-burns-cash/
349. In years to come, we will all look back and wonder how so many people were taken in by this shyster, who makes Enron look honest.
350. One of Tesla’s greatest strengths is its ability to monetize the patience and goodwill of its customers and loyal fans. The company is sitting on a staggering $854 million in customer deposits as of the end of 2017.
351. Since Tesla sells its products direct to consumers, without relying on a dealer network, customer deposits are cash payments that essentially serve as interest-free loans—and these loans can stretch on for years. If Tesla were to go bankrupt, those deposit holders would likely be wiped out.
352. Tesla is holding customer deposits for two vehicles that aren’t even in production yet: an electric Tesla Semi ($20,000 deposit) and a next-generation Roadster (either $50,000 down or the $250,000 retail price paid up front to reserve a limited edition). Even customers interested in installing an array of solar roof panels or the company’s Powerwall home battery must hand over $1,000 to place an order.
353. Tesla doesn’t break out deposit numbers by car, but the vast majority comes from $1,000 reservations for the Model 3. When Musk first introduced the lower-priced sedan in March 2016, fans stood in long lines at Tesla stores. Two years later, the slower-than-expected pace of production means that most of the more than 400,000 reservation holders are still waiting. And new people appear to be joining the queue: As of April, the company reported “net Model 3 reservations remained stable.”
354. There’s an additional source of free money from loyal believers: An unknown number of customers have paid up for vehicle features—$3,000 for “Full Self Driving” capability, for example—that Tesla thus far hasn’t figured out or released to anyone.
355. Elon Musk cooked the books by emailing interested sales prospects and asked them to put a deposit down before each quarter ended so he could book their tiny deposits as fully transacted $60K+ “sales” before each quarter closed.
356. Elon Musk and SpaceX are being sued by multiple employees for “lying about safety standards, safety records” and deadly safety defects.
357. The Elon Musk Tesla Money Laundering Board Of Directors is as full of fraud and corruption as Musk. Birds of a feather stick together and the Jurvetson, Draper, Musk, et al; clan of corruption runs deep. The Board of Directors can’t operate their scam without the whole pack of thieves and liars in place. An outsider will break theirs swamp of tax evasion, Dark Money political bribes, off-shore cash, self-dealing, book-cooking, real estate fraud, expense padding and other nefarious deeds.
358. Dianne Feinstein’s family member: Herb Newman of Sausalito, California’s HR firm: Newman Search (415 332-8425) has a company as of 1972 with the sole purpose of setting up investment bank deals with the People’s Republic of China. Feinstein arranged for Newman to provide the staffing for Tesla and Solyndra. Dianne Fenstein has been under investigation for spy activities with China and her senior aide was arrested as a Chinese top spy. In 1973 Mr. Newman arrived in Canton at the invitation of the Chinese Council for the Promotion of International Trade. (CCPIT). He and his company MVTC were one of fifty businesses to be invited to the Canton Trade Fair held in Kwangchow China. In 1978 Mr. Newman founded China Investments and in partnership with California Trade Delegations both companies as members of the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce began taking US Corporations to China. Mr. Newman along with one of his associates at the time Mr. Darryl Schoon helped organize Senator Dianne Feinstein’s first trip to China in conjunction with the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce. Herb Newman, Mart Bailey and Feinstein’s Husband; Dick Blum are on intelligence agency watch-lists, and under electronic surveillance, for potentially corrupt deals with China, Tesla and Solyndra.
359. Dianne Feinstein’s husband owns CBRE which owns the real estate contracts for both Tesla and Solyndra.
360. Dianne Feinstein’s family owns interests in the construction companies hired by both Tesla and Solyndra.
361. Dianne Feinstein had her staff warn other California businesses away from using the NUMMI car factory in order to protect the real estate deal for both Tesla ans CBRE, which is owned by her husband.
362. Tesla began real estate deals in multiple states and then cancelled them at the last minute, which got them sued for fraud and charged with “lying” to different communities. They started, and then pulled out of these different building (San Jose, Southern California, New Mexico, Etc.) deals, because CBRE and Feinstein were trying to leverage real estate profit exploitation using taxpayer funding.
363. Panasonic and Tesla have known for decades that the Panasonic 18650 batteries used in the Tesla suffer from multiple chemistry degradation defects which will almost always make them eventually explode or “go thermal”. The defects include: 1.) LENR activation, 2.) Dendrite lengthening, 3.) Particle congealing, 4.) Chemistry evolution and other defects. The Tesla projects is, essentially, a failed product product dumping effort of a failed and dangerous battery product.
364. Elon Musk has demanded that his employees sign “loyalty pledges”, “vows” and engage in Omerta’s in order to keep the corruption details of Tesla from being exposed to the public.
365. Tesla insider Antonio Gracias is the mob boss insider at Tesla who arranges media hit-jobs on those who displease Musk.
366. The NHTSB has issued requests to Tesla for safety tests and data that Tesla never complied with. Instead, Tesla paid bribes, which were referred to as “fees” to avoid having to complete those tests. An independent group of outside investigators issued a damning safety report to the NHTSB demanding that Tesla be compelled to produce the safety tests in 2010 but Obama appointed NHTSB executives buried the report and protected Tesla in order to keep the connection between Obama’s funding and Tesla protected. NHTSB boss: Strickland, an Obama insider, was confronted with this in Washington, DC and resigned from his job 48 hours later. NHTSB has still not acted on the severe Tesla safety defects that have been reported since 2009.
367. An SEC investigation of Musk uncovered horrific evidence of Musk corruption but the SEC could not report or act on it because Obama congressional bosses and lobbyists got the SEC investigation “limited” to only examine a single Twitter “Tweet” from Musk.
368. Elon Musk is protected by top DOJ, SEC, CFTC, FEC and other Obama left-over staff as well as 45 U.S. Senators and top Federal Reserve members and Goldman Sachs, who live in terror that exposure of the entire Elon Musk financial food-chain will topple the entire DNC Dark Money payola scam. This is the reason that Tesla can get away with so much obvious and overt corruption and still continue operations. Tesla Motors book-cooking, financial frauds and political payola conduits, if fully revealed, would change the course of political influence in America.
369. Elon Musk has been sued by a man that Musk called a “Pedo”, yet Musk’s own father has been accused of child sex abuse, racism and, indeed, got his own daughter pregnant!
370. Elon Musk’s mother has been accused of being a “self-indulgent trophy wife” who Musk was trained by to be an arrogant elitist. Her hatred of black people was imbued on Musk who has been sued by black people at his company for “running a racist culture”.
371. Elon Musk divorced the same woman twice because she knew his dirty little secret and threatened to out him if he did not keep the deal going. She was hired to “act” as his wife.
372.  Musical artist Iggy Azalea was at a Musk Party, with other friends, who captured Elon Musk on video on drugs and in weird sex acts. Musk had Iggy’s camera stolen at the party to hie the evidence but he did not get the other cameras and did not realize that some of those cameras placed their images and videos directly on the Cloud, where hackers acquired them.
373. With cover-up help from Eric Holder, Steven Chu, Obama, Valarie Jarret, DNC FBI agents, Perkins Coie, Covington and Burling, Wilson Sonsini, etc; sociopath Musk actually believes he is “untouchable” and that he can get away with anything. His downfall will be the same downfall of every narcissist sociopath oligarch throughout all of recorded history.
374. Elon Musk is a drug addict. A simple urine and blood test proves it. Musk’s downfall and the downfall of John DeLorean are seeming to align.
375. Dianne Feinstein and Nancy Pelosi are violating the law protecting Tesla by withholding investigations and prosecutions? Why are they allowing American citizens to continue to die from the 1.) “sudden acceleration electronics defect”; 2.) “The failed Auto-pilot electronics defect”3.) “The deteriorating and deadly lithium ion batteries” and 4.) numerous other defects widely documented in the news media and filed lawsuits?
376. Elon Musk exists because he bribed DNC politicians including Obama, Clinton and Senators Feinstein, Reid, Boxer, Harris, Spier and Pelosi to give him free taxpayer cash and government resources. This is proven when you follow-the-money and the insider trading, stock ownership and crony payola kick-backs.
377. The Energy Dept (DOE) has been covering-up organized crime activities at DOE in which DOE funds are being used as a slush-fund to pay off DNC campaign financiers and to pay for CIA/GPS Fusion-Class attacks on Silicon Valley business competitors.
378. DNC campaign financiers and DOE staff share stock market holdings with each other under family trusts, shell corporations and layered Goldman Sachs accounts. The deal was: Obama funds Tesla, Musk conduits campaign funds to Obama, top Obama staff profit off of insider Musk stocks.
379. Musk exploits poor people and child slaves in the Congo and Afghanistan to mine his lithium and Cobalt. Look up this phrase on the top search engines: “child labor electric car batteries”.
380. The Silicon Valley Paypal Mafia promotes Musk as a “Tech God” leader but, in reality Musk is the same kind of “Leader” as Charles Manson, Jim Jones, David Koresh, Swami Rajneesh and Al Capone. His own people have sued him for fraud and lies once they realized that Musk-ism and Scientology had so much in common.
381. Musk holds the record for getting sued for fraud by his investors, wives, former partners, employees, suppliers and co-founders. Elon Musk has gone out of his way to hire hundreds of ex-CIA and In-Q-Tel staff and assign them to “dirty tricks teams” to attack his competitors and elected officials who Musk hates.
382. Musk and his culture are being sued for abuse to women and blacks and the Unions hate him for lying to them. https://stopelonfromfailingagain.com reveals even more Musk lies.
383. THIS corruption is what all of the big political scandals are about today!
384. THIS corruption involves TRILLIONS of dollars of corrupt mining deals, automotive and energy monopolies!
385. THIS is why the federal budget analysis reports are showing TRILLIONS of dollars of ‘untraceable’ losses from the United States Treasury from 2006 up to today!
386. THIS is why a large number of reporters, whistle-blowers and prosecutors suddenly, and mysteriously turned up dead!
387. THIS can all be proven in jury trial and in live televised Congressional hearings!
388. This is all being covered up because top State and Federal officials are in on it, own the stock in it and are so deeply involved in it that they could go to Federal prison when this all comes out.
389. The anxieties that lurk beneath the tremendous ambition of Tesla Inc. moved into the forefront in recent weeks. The company again fell far short of its own production targets for the mass-market Model 3 sedan, another person died in a crash involving its assisted-driving feature and Musk entered into a public dispute with federal safety regulators. Tesla’s once high-flying stock, buffeted by a downgrade from credit analysts, has dropped 24 percent from its peak in September.
390. There’s a good reason to worry: No one has raised or spent money the way Elon Musk has. Nor has any other chief executive officer of a public company made a bankruptcy joke on Twitter at a time when so much seemed to be unraveling.
391. Tesla is going through money so fast that, without additional financing, there is now a genuine risk that the 15-year-old company could run out of cash in 2018. The company burns through more than $6,500 every minute, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Free cash flow—the amount of cash a company generates after accounting for capital expenditures—has been negative for five consecutive quarters. That will be a key figure to watch when Tesla reports earnings May 2.Read the full story here: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-tesla-burns-cash/
392. In years to come, we will all look back and wonder how so many people were taken in by this shyster, who makes Enron look honest.A
393.  lot of Musk’s money has been extracted from suckers, who think he is God’s gift, as Bloomberg reports:One of Tesla’s greatest strengths is its ability to monetize the patience and goodwill of its customers and loyal fans. The company is sitting on a staggering $854 million in customer deposits as of the end of 2017.
394. Since Tesla sells its products direct to consumers, without relying on a dealer network, customer deposits are cash payments that essentially serve as interest-free loans—and these loans can stretch on for years. If Tesla were to go bankrupt, those deposit holders would likely be wiped out.
395. Tesla is holding customer deposits for two vehicles that aren’t even in production yet: an electric Tesla Semi ($20,000 deposit) and a next-generation Roadster (either $50,000 down or the $250,000 retail price paid up front to reserve a limited edition). Even customers interested in installing an array of solar roof panels or the company’s Powerwall home battery must hand over $1,000 to place an order.
396. Tesla doesn’t break out deposit numbers by car, but the vast majority comes from $1,000 reservations for the Model 3. When Musk first introduced the lower-priced sedan in March 2016, fans stood in long lines at Tesla stores. Two years later, the slower-than-expected pace of production means that most of the more than 400,000 reservation holders are still waiting. And new people appear to be joining the queue: As of April, the company reported “net Model 3 reservations remained stable.”
397. There’s an additional source of free money from loyal believers: An unknown number of customers have paid up for vehicle features—$3,000 for “Full Self Driving” capability, for example—that Tesla thus far hasn’t figured out or released to anyone.
398. The consumer psychology that sees hundreds of thousands of people essentially extending an interest-free loan to a public company is unusual, to say the least. I think the phrase “more money than sense” rather sums it up
399. Apple and Google also named in US lawsuit over Congolese child cobalt mining deaths for Elon Musk’s Tesla Cars. Dell, Microsoft and Tesla also among tech firms named in case brought by families of children killed or injured while mining in DRC.‘I saw the unbearable grief inflicted on families by cobalt mining. I pray for chan Elon Musk’s cobalt extraction in DRC has been linked to child labour.
400. A landmark legal case has been launched against the world’s largest tech companies by Congolese families who say their children were killed or maimed while mining for cobalt used to power smartphones, laptops and electric cars, the Guardian can reveal.
401. Apple, Google, Dell, Microsoft and Tesla have been named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in Washington DC by human rights firm International Rights Advocates on behalf of 14 parents and children from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The lawsuit accuses the companies of aiding and abetting in the death and serious injury of children who they claim were working in cobalt mines in their supply chain.
402. The lawsuit argues that Apple, Google, Dell, Microsoft and Tesla all aided and abetted the mining companies that profited from the labour of children who were forced to work in dangerous conditions – conditions that ultimately led to death and serious injury. The families argue in the claim that their children were working illegally at mines owned by UK mining company Glencore. The court papers allege that cobalt from the Glencore-owned mines is sold to Umicore, a Brussels-based metal and mining trader, which then sells battery-grade cobalt to Apple, Google, Tesla, Microsoft and Dell.
403. Other plaintiffs in the court documents say they worked at mines owned by Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt, a major Chinese cobalt firm, which the lawsuit claims supplies Apple, Dell, and Microsoft and is likely to supply the other defendants.
404. Another child, referred to as John Doe 1, says that he started working in the mines when he was nine. The lawsuit claims that earlier this year, he was working as a human mule for Kamoto Copper Company, carrying bags of cobalt rocks for $0.75 a day, when he fell into a tunnel. After he was dragged out of the tunnel by fellow workers, he says he was left alone on the ground at the mining site until his parents heard about the accident and arrived to help him. He is now paralysed from the chest down and will never walk again.
405. Other families included in the claim say that their children were killed in tunnel collapses or suffered serious injuries such as smashed limbs and broken spines while crawling through tunnels or carrying heavy loads. The families say that none were paid any compensation for the deaths and injuries.
406. One of the central allegations in the lawsuit is that Apple, Google, Dell, Microsoft and Tesla were aware and had “specific knowledge” that the cobalt they use in their products is linked to child labour performed in hazardous conditions, and were complicit in the forced labour of the children
407. Is is charged that the Musk empire is an organized crime program that exists between Silicon Valley tech oligarchs, investment banks, U.S. Senators, government agency staff and White House staff who engage in these crimes.
408. That public officials knowingly participate in these crimes by failing to report their associates who engage in these illicit actions and by hiring suppliers who operate these illicit activities.
409. That the Musk empire suspects manipulate government funds for their personal profiteering at the expense of domestic citizen taxpayers like us.
410. That the Musk empire suspects operate a vast stock market manipulation program, as a core function of their operations, and those illicit deeds function at the expense of the public to render unjust gain to public officials.
411. That the Musk empire suspects contract a known group of lobbyists, corrupt law firms, unethical CPA’s, corrupt investment banks and specialized corruption services providers to attack, defame, physically harm, character assassinate, black-list and/or kill those they dislike and they harmed many persons with those acts.
412. That the Musk empire suspects operate an Epstein-like sex-trafficking network of prostitutes and sexual extortion activities and locations for the engagement of said activities and for the bribery of cohorts via sex workers and that Musk was a personal associate of Jeffrey Epstein.
413. That the Musk empire suspects engage in electronic attacks and manipulations including hacking, election manipulation, media censorship and internet search results manipulation in order to mask their schemes.
414. That the Musk empire suspects engage in Lois Lerner-like, SPYGATE-like, VA whistleblower-like reprisal and retribution  attacks using government agencies like SSA, DOJ, FBI, LSC, HUD, HHS, DOE, Etc
415. It is demanded that Elon Musk be arrested on RICO Racketeering, Anti-Trust, Tax Evasion, Bribery, and related charges!
416. Elon Musk had sex with a young non-age-appropriate rock and roll girl and got her pregnant.
417. Elon Musk dated anal sex advocate Gwenyth Paltrow who later told her friends that he was full of shit.
418. Elon Musk divorced one actress, then had to remarry her because she had the goods on him.
419. Video exists of Elon Musk at various sex parties.
420. Elon Musk dated Johnny Depp’s girlfriend Amber Heard who thought that Musk was even more controlling than Johnny Depp.
421. The NUMMI car factory that Musk took over was first called, by Musk, in the media “non-functional”. Even the two major car makers that were using it had abandoned it. Feinstein make Musk take it because here husband’s company: CBRE Realty, managed the property around it.
422. Musk never made good on his promises to NUMMI workers or the Unions representing the NUMMI factory.
423. After getting an insane amount of exclusive free cash from the taxpayers, Musk flew workers in from overseas.
424. Multiple women have charged Musk for sexual abuse and factory misogyny.
425. Musk couldn’t make it in college and bailed out.
426. Far more SpaceX rockets have exploded and fully failed than the public is aware of.
427. Musk said he would already have sent his buddies around the moon but many potential passengers have bailed out after they saw the due diligence on SpaceX lack of experience.
428. Musk, Draper, Page, Westly, Schmidt, Brin and other famous tech asshole billionaires have formally agreed to run a “cartel” to control news, information and industries.
429. Inside the Tesla that Elon Musk had SpaceX put in orbit is a “confession folder” that would destroy Musk if anyone went up and got it.
430. Elon Musk believes he could kill someone and not get in trouble because he has so many California Senator’s, Tier one law firms and former White House staff protecting him.
431. Elon Musk is the Citizen Kane of the modern world. He thinks he is the Al Capone of Technology. He uses things that appear to be all “crunchy granola” on the surface to steal taxpayer subsidies with the help of corrupt politicians.
432. Aside from Musk’s own personal dirty operations and orders, the largest facilitator of his crimes is the large group of men inside Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan dedicated to supporting his crimes and corruptions.
433. Through covert conduits, Elon Musk pays blogger James Ayre to shill is schemes online.
434. Musk’s entire media plan is self-promotional aggrandizing and fake virtue-signaling to keep the news off his case.
435. The SEC made him quit but he just changed one letterhead graphic and nothing else. Musk still runs Tesla and the rest of the empire just like he always did.
436. Musk covertly funds abortion projects because he gets so many girls pregnant and refuses to use a condom.
437. Deutsche Bank is the other biggest player in the Musk Empire money laundering, political payola and corruption crimes.
438. Musk stole most of his designs from others, as proven by the U.S. Patent office and previous publications.
439. When Elon Musk’s Hyper-loop crashes, it will turn all of the passengers into a bloody applesauce like nightmare.
440. Musk’s 5G SpaceX Starlink Satellites could destroy the environment, will add to the cancer-causing radiation of the Earth and are to be used to spy on consumer’s uses of the internet.
441. In lawsuits, Musk always pleads that he “has no money”.
442. X-Ray analysis by over 40 major laboratories prove that Elon Musk’s lithium ion batteries have severe and constantly degrading defects inherent in their construction. Musk has known about these dangers for decades but chose to work with Panasonic to cover it up.
443. Elon Musk lost a LEMON CAR lawsuit proving that his cars are poorly designed and manufactured.
444. Elon Musk’s union negotiating tactics are: “delay, deny, defer and claim to be conducting a fake study…”
445. Elon Musk’s take-over of Tesla from Martin Eberhardt, the actual founder, was based on an Obama Administration scheme to exploit Lithium mines in Afghanistan and Cobalt mines in the Congo, which Obama financiers had bought the rights to. Frank Guistra and Goldman Sachs helped come up with this scheme.
446. A famous article about SpaceX quotes a top Musk staff staffer saying Musk is a “liar”.
447. A top SpaceX engineer has sued Spacex for lying about rocket safety and says that Musk does not care about science, he cares about publicity.
448. Most of the “famous” people Musk hired, quit after seeing what a sham his operations are.
449. Jared Birchell, of Burlingame, is terrified that Musk will have him killed because he knows “where the bodies are buried”, but he has to act demure and “stay-off-the-press-radar” for now to keep Musk from paying too much attention to him.
450. Every property that Musk owned has been bugged by government, news or competitor specialists.
451. Musk takes a number of drugs for mental issues yet he runs companies with products that can easily kill their users. Many think that he should be under closer federal supervision.
452. The U.S. Department of Energy PR Department has been ordered by Obama officials (who, shockingly, are still there even during the Trump Administration) to always hype up Musk because, WHEN Musk fully fails, it will prove that the Department of Energy funded him because Obama ordered them to and not based on any merits. Most every Applicant for DOE funds beat Musk on every merit EXCEPT CRONYISM!
453. Trump-hating Elon Musk wanted to nay say Trump by subjecting Tesla workers to COVID death by refusing to close plant
454. Musk uses his own workers to play deadly politics with their lives in COVID closure he refused
455. Musk totally lied about his capacity, ability and knowledge to make COVID ventilators in order to scam political funding
456. Musk sent snoring devices instead of ventilators and lied about those products in order to Virtue Signal for his own hype
457. Musk has had babies with many women in an Epstein-like master plan to seed the world with his DNA so that mini-Musk’s will live on forever. Each ex-baby momma has been paid massive sums to keep quiet about his misdeeds.
458. Musk uses his many mansions to hide money and operate tax manipulation efforts.
459. The “Mainstream Media” is controlled by Democrat bosses who refuse to allow any negative news to be printed about Musk because Musk conduits funds to the DNC.
460. One of Musk’s ‘baby ovens’ known as “Grimes’ has been revealed to have been used as a “sex toy for Musk” by Grimes friends.
461. The U.S. Department of Energy has a federal policy of promoting Musk’s hype because they are liable for criminal prosecution because Secretary of Energy Steven Chu and his staff helped organize Musk’s embezzlement of taxpayer funded monies and insider-traded on that profiteering.
462. Failing Elon Musk tries to make Alameda County pay for his failed NUMMI factory by using COVID as an excuse!
463. The cooling fluid of Tesla cars leaks into the battery chamber and causes the batteries to explode and Musk ordered that defect covered up.
464. The touch-screen on the car has a huge number of programming defects in it that can crash the car
465. Musk has had unprotected sex with a number of women and is on a mission to get a number of women pregnant in order to “spread his DNA around”.

The Malignant Narcissism And Cartel Climate Of Elon Musk And His Billionaire Frat Boy Club

At almost every juncture, Elon Musk has made egotistical decisions that lead to more failures. His behavior is that of a person who has no care or concern for the health, safety and welfare of the American people. Nothing could epitomize that more perfectly than his grotesque suggestions that we should shoot nuclear bombs off on Mars or that nobody will care that his Starlink Satellites are designed to spy on the public. This would seem comical, and entirely unbelievable, if it had not actually happened.

In 2006 the many scientists told Elon Musk and his advisers of the high likelihood that a pandemic of lithium ion battery explosions would strike the nation and advised the incoming administration to take appropriate steps to reduce its impact. Obama officials hid the dangers because they owned stock in lithium and cobalt mines for those batteries, particularly in Afghanistan.

In November of 2007, the experts warned Obama that the country was likely to be afflicted with a devastating pandemic of lithium ion originating from Asian and Russian oligarchs.

In January 2009, the Obama administration was told by its own experts, Bernard Tse and his team who knew Tesla bosses, Sandia and others that the lithium ion batteries in Tesla cars had degrading chemistry which become a global pandemic of auto danger. Again, Obama chose inaction.

Obama and Musk have deprived Democratic-led regions of the country from receiving needed safety reviews of Tesla cars.

Over the year’s since 2006, Americans working with the DOE, NHTSA, SEC and other groups accelerated warnings to Obama officials. These engineers and other science professionals were intentionally ignored in order to protect politicians stock market profits.

In these, and any other examples, Musk and his inner circle of White House and Senate insiders ignored or purged experts and other truth-tellers, and lied about, misrepresented, deflected or denied the dire threat to the American people posed by the lithium ion battery scam.

Considered in total, Musk and his regime have shown themselves to be incompetent, callous, malevolent and deeply cruel in their response to the Tesla safety issue crisis (as well as to a plethora of other issues).

But to merely document the Musk regime’s deadly failures in response to the dangers of his companies is to ignore the most important question: What are Musk’s and his advisers’ underlying motivations?

This forensic question must be answered if we are ever to have a full accounting of the Musk Corruption, and see justice done for the voters, the dead tesla victims and those who will die in the future as well as the damage done to the broader American community.

The coordinated ‘main-stream’ media’s preferred storyline that suggests Musk is simply incompetent doesn’t add up because Muskhas made the wrong decision every single time in terms of how crises like this are supposed to be dealt with. (i.e. Be consistent, transparent, factual, and credible.) It’s increasingly not believable for the left-wing press to suggest that Musk has been distracted or inept during this crisis, in part because of the level of his uselessness has become so staggering.

Maybe Musk is vengeful. Maybe he wants to wreck the economy to create investment opportunities? He’s under the thumb of a foreign entity? He wants to cause panic and cancel the November elections? He’s a fatalist? Who knows. And honestly, the specific “why” isn’t what matters now. What matters is asking the difficult questions and pondering what the Musk oligarchy  is truly about, no matter what lurks in the shadows…

Now the press needs to shift some of its focus and ask the truly alarming questions about Musk and his motives. Because we still don’t know why he essentially ordered his companies to embark on such sinister ventures involving slicing up brains; over-priced deadly cars for rich douche-bags; digging holes for billionaire hide-outs, launching domestic spy satellites and manipulating elections along with his boyfriend: Larry Page, etc…

Psychologist and psychotherapists have an answer: Elon Musk is a “malignant narcissist”. Musk’s mental pathologies inexorably compel him to hurt and defraud large numbers of people — including his own supporters.

Exports have looked at Musk’s borderline personality disorders. They explais that sadism and violence are central to Musk’s malignant narcissism and his decision-making about his self-promotion. They warn that Musk is abuser locked into a deeply dysfunctional relationship with the American people and that, like other sadists, Musk enjoys causing harm and suffering to any that do not recognize his “tech Jesus” self-proclaimed superiority.

Ultimately, all psychologists generally concludes that Musk is engaging in “democidal behavior” in partnership with Obama and Pelosi and cautions that the many dead and injured (so far) from the Tesla fires and crashes are not simply collateral damage from the Musk madness, but rather the logical outcome of Musk’s apparent mental pathologies and the poor decisions that flow from them.

Musk is both denying responsibility by saying things such as, “I take no responsibility. We’ve done everything right.” But at the same time, Musk is also sabotaging the efforts to stop the corruption in his empire. This is a very important aspect of Musk’s behavior. Musk is not just deflecting blame onto others, he is actively interfering with the politicianss’ ability to do their job by controlled Senators with bribes. Musk is not just incompetent. He is actively engaging in sabotage against competitors and reporters who speak the truth about him.

You might wonder: How does someone with his type of mind reconcile claims like “I have total power” with “I take no responsibility”? He has said both things within a few days of each other. Well; That is a function of how the psychology of a malignant narcissist is structured. When Musk says things such as, “I have total power,” that’s the grandiosity. “I’m in total control” is a function of Musk’s paranoia, where everything bad is projected outward. Therefore, anything negative or bad is someone else’s fault. Bad things are ‘other people’ in Musk ’s mind. The grandiosity and “greatness” are all him. Musk’s mind runs on a formula which bends and twists facts, ideas and memories to suit his malignant narcissism. This is why Musk contradicts himself so easily. He lies and makes things up. His fantasies all serve his malignant narcissism and the world he has created in his own mind about his greatness.

Another component of Musk’s malignant narcissism is sadism. That part of Musk’s mind is more hidden. People such as Musk are malignant-narcissist sadists because they, at some deep level, are driven to cause harm to other people. Musk’s life is proof of this. His pedo father and trophy wife narcissist mother demonstrate his roots. He enjoys ripping people off and humiliating people. He does this manically and gleefully. He has lied thousands of times. He threatens people online and elsewhere. Most psychologists believe that Elon Musk is also a sexual sadist, who on some basic level enjoys and is aroused by watching people be afraid of him. In his mind, Musk is creating chaos and instability so that he can feel powerful.

Professor of psychiatry and psychoanalyst Otto Kernberg called that phenomenon “omnipotent destructiveness.” The bullying, the violence, the destruction, frightening people, humiliating people, getting revenge and the like — such behavior is what Elon Musk has done his whole life. It is who Elon Musk really is. Unfortunately, too many people are still in denial of that fact.

Musk has to create and control a field of negative corrupting energy around himself. For example, he pressures the scientific experts to bend the truth to his dreamworld during his press conferences. The scientists are basically Musk’s hostages. The American people are hostages as well to Elon Musk’s lies. We are being abused by him. We know that Musk is lying. We know that he’s doing nothing to help us. We feel helpless to do anything to stop him. It is causing collective mental despair. It is not that all Americans are suckers or dupes, it is that Musk is a master at such cruel and manipulative behavior.

Elon Musk is a master at getting negative attention, and the more people he can shock and upset, the better.

Malignant narcissists like Elon Musk view other human beings as kindling wood to be burned for their own personal enrichment, media enlargement and hype expansion.

Follow the facts to the obvious and true conclusion. If all the facts show that Elon Musk (and his little boy buddies Larry Page, Eric Schmidt, John Doerr, Reid Hoffman, Steve Westly, etc.) is a malignant narcissist with these powerful sadistic tendencies, this omnipotent destructiveness, where he’s getting pleasure and a sense of power from dominating people and degrading people and destroying people and plundering people and laying waste to people, both psychologically and physically, then to deny such obvious facts is willful ignorance.

When Musk is finally exposed, like Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos or ENRON, it will be glorious.

Rather than making a prediction as to Musk’s specific actions when the emperor has no clothes, it is more helpful to describe the type of actions he will take. Rather than trying to say, “This is the move he’ll make.” Like in a relationship, Elon Musk is the abuser. He is the husband or father who is abusing his partner or children or other relatives. The American people are like a woman who is leaving her abuser. She tells her abuser, “That’s it! I am done with you!” She has her keys in hand and is opening the door of the house or apartment to finally leave. What happens? The democidal maniac Elon Musk will attack us, badly. Make no mistake. Elon Musk is going to find a way to attack and cause great harm to the American people if he believes that he will be fully exposed. He will use his spy satellites, his media controls, his remote controlled cars, his stock market manipulation tools, his Goldman Sachs economic destruction team and more. Musk will strike back… unless the FBI finally arrests him first.

The Bottom Line: These people are crooks, using your tax money to conduct crimes and protect themselves from arrest at your expense!

—————————————————————

The following person’s were whistle-blowers or innocent victims in this crime. They died via strange, suspicious and untimely circumstances. Some of them may have been murdered for helping with this case. This is not a complete list.

In Memory of:

Rajeev Motwani; Gary D. Conley; Seth Rich; Philip Haney; David Bird; Doug Bourn; Misti Epstein; Joshua Brown; Kenneth Bellando; Moritz Erhardt; Imran Aliev; Kate Matrosova; David Drye; Vincent Foster; Kathy Ferguson; Duane Garrett; Eric S. Fox; Judi Gibbs; Berta Caceres; Suzanne Coleman; L.J. Davis; John Hillyer; Stanley Huggins; Sandy Hume; Shawn Lucas; Gary Johnson; John Jones; John F. Kennedy, Jr.; Stephen Ivens; Mary ‘Caity’ Mahoney; Eric Butera; Danny Casolara; John Ashe; Tony Moser; Larry Nichols; Joseph Rago; Ron Brown; Bob Simon; Don Adams; Peter Smith; Victor Thorn; Lori Klausutis; Gareth Williams; Daphne Caruana Galizia; James D Johnston; Dave Goldberg; Loretta Fuddy; Paul Wilcher; Gary Webb; Beranton J. Whisenant Jr; Stanley Meyer; Jon Parnell Walker; Tyler Drumheller; Barnaby Jack; Dominic Di-Natale; Barbara Wise; Ilya Zhitomirskiy; Jeff Joe Black; Robin Copeland; John Wheeler; Ashley Turton; Michael Hastings; Antonin Scalia; David Koschman; David Werner; Alex Okrent; Kam Kuwata; Larry Frankel; And hundreds more connected to this case who suddenly, and strangely, turned up dead in this case and, ironically, their deaths all benefit the suspects in this case…

 

– Rajeev Motwani taught Google how to Google. Suddenly, in perfect health, he was found floating face-down, dead, in his Silicon Valley swimming pool. It helps certain people that he can no longer talk.

– Gary D. Conley was the CleanTech competitor to, and whistle-blower on, the suspects. He was suddenly found with a bullet in his head behind Beale Air Force base. It helps certain people that he can no longer talk.

– Google programmer Forrest Hayes, who worked on Google search engine rigging, was suddenly found dead with the story that “he was overdosed by a Google hooker on his sex yacht”.

– Google associate and Tesla Investments founder Ravi Kumar was aslso killed by a hooker.

– Deep Google investor VC liason and husband of Facebook executive Cheryl Sandberg was suddenly found dead with a hole is his head. The “official” story is that he was the first person in history to be killed by his treadmill.

– David Bird was the Wall Street Journal energy reporter who was working on a story that involved Cleantech energy connections of some of the suspects. He was working on a story about who controlled the modern energy industry and cleantech.He went for a walk and was found a long time later, dead, floating in a pond. It helps certain people that he can no longer talk.

– One Mr. Breitbart was a famous blogger, who railed on the web about the political manipulations of the suspects. Suddenly, he had a “heart attack” in his shower and died. It helps certain people that he can no longer talk on the blogs.

– Mr. Slym , with Tata Motors was involved in a car deal with some of the suspects for one of the biggest Indian auto-makers. Suddenly he was a stain on the sidewalk, accomplished by his fall from the top of a skyscraper hotel. It helps certain people that he can no longer talk.

– Doug Bourn, The senior electrical engineer at Tesla (Google’s covert partner), Andrew Ingram of Palo Alto, a top systems electrical engineer at Tesla; and Brian M. Finn the senior manager of interactive electronics, at Tesla, had deep knowledge of financial misdeeds and technical cover-ups at Tesla Motors. They were key parts of the Tesla operation. For some reason, they all got into a private airplane, in perfect health, and then the airplane plowed into the ground, killing all three at once. It helps certain people that they can no longer talk. They wrote, and helped describe, in Tesla’s own federal patent filings, the fact that Tesla’s batteries would kill you, maim you and/or burn your house down. Tesla did not realize this when they paid the federal patent filing fees. When Tesla, later realized this, they were forced to give all of their patents away for free. These three senior engineers had deep inside knowledge of the Tesla Motors operations. Their aircraft suffered an “Engineering failure”.

The above individuals had absolute knowledge of this case and some of them were known to have been whistle-blowers in this case.

All of these people (now over 50+ people) were in top health, had lots of money and were not likely to have died when they did. Then they died, suddenly and suspiciously, under bizarre circumstances. They were all connected to the suspects. Over 50 investment bankers connected to the suspects and their Goldman Sach’s finance group are also suddenly dead under bizarre circumstances.

The tactics that the Department of Energy and Obama White House staff have practiced, so far, are to LIE, DENY, DEFLECT, DELETE and DIVERT. History has proven that those tactics didn’t work for them. Now it is time for DOE to pay the damages.

SEE THE HARD FACT CASE EVIDENCE AT: http://newsplus007.com

————————

THE BASICS

CAPSULE OVERVIEW: A crime involving stock market securities insider-trading, contracts, bribes and famous politicians occurred. We saw it, were invited in to it, and reported it and now a cover-up is being operated.

EXPANDED CAPSULE OVERVIEW: Department of Energy Staff (ie: Chu, Zoi, Seward, Cohen, etc.), White House Staff (ie: Emanual, Axelrod, Carney, Plouffe, Gibbs, etc.), CIA staff (ie: Panetta, Woolsey) owned the rare earth (ie: lithium, indium, cobalt) mining scam stock (ie: Goldman Sachs & JP Morgan transfers) market securities from foreign countries (ie: Afghanistan, Congo, etc.) which only benefited themselves, Elon Musk and his Silicon Valley Cartel (ie: Page, Cohen, Schmidt, Westly, Khosla, Spinner, Hoffman, etc.). They ran hit-jobs and anti-trust schemes against competitors and whistle-blowers using a racketeering operation structure. They run corporate escort rings, lobbyist bribe PACs, money laundering and tax evasion joint operations and character assassination media cartels.

MORE DETAILED OVERVIEW:

– Famous political figures use the trillions of dollars in government treasuries and the stock market for illicit profiteering by rigging the system exclusively for themselves and their crony insiders.

– They attacked us using government taxpayer funded media (Fusion GPS, Black Cube, Google, Pysops, Gizmodo, Media Matters, Blumenthal, etc.) and spy agency tools because we competed with their businesses and reported their crimes.

– San Francisco Bay Area government has as many corrupt politicians as Chicago and relies on the same RICO-violating insider corruption network to operate; as proven by deep AI searches of their financial records. Arrests of those officials is now underway.

– Silicon Valley law enforcement records prove that these tech oligarchs engage in an organized, racketeering-based, massive sex trafficking, tax evasion, anti-trust violating, spousal abuse, money laundering, black-listing, racist, ageist, political bribery, crony racketeering crime Cartel.

– Famous U.S. Senators, Governors and their staff knowingly engage in, finance, operate and benefit from these crimes in exchange for search engine manipulation and stock market assets.

– Silicon Valley and Hollywood media companies censor and cover-up news coverage of these crimes because they have a financial connection to the perpetrators.

– Most of the government officials working on our case were hand-picked by our business adversaries. Our case has never been fairly reviewed by non-biased, non-conflicted officials. Our FBI-class associates have not found a single entity in our case reviews, or determinations, who was not either: financed by, friends, with, sleeping with, dating the staff of, holding stock market assets in, promised a revolving door job or government service contracts from, partying with, personal friends with, photographed at private events with, exchanging emails with, business associates of or directed by; one of those business adversaries, or the Senators and politicians that those business adversaries pay campaign finances to, or supply political digital services to.

ASK THE INSPECTOR GENERALS AT DOJ, SEC, DOE, FBI, CFTC, SSA, SEC, FEC, GAO, OSC ABOUT THE STATUS OF OUR CASE. WE HAVE TALKED TO THEIR OFFICES, EMAILED VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, MET WITH THEM AND …NOTHING…EVER..GETS..DONE! IS IT A COVER-UP?

———————————————-

Who Are The Big Tech Billionaires Plotting Sweeping Secret Plans to Manipulate National Elections In Exchange For Crony Payola Perks?

Joseph Vazquez

LinkedIn Co-Founder Reid Hoffman, who notoriously backed a group that “spread disinformation during the 2017 Alabama special election for U.S. Senate,” is now being joined by other Big Tech billionaires in a plot to boost presumptive Democratic nominee for president Joe Biden in 2020.

Democrats are “scrambling to patch [Biden’s] digital deficits,” according to Vox Recode. “[B]ehind the scenes, Silicon Valley’s billionaire Democrats are spending tens of millions of dollars on their own sweeping plans to catch up to President Donald Trump’s lead on digital campaigning.” [Emphasis added.] Recode said these “sweeping plans” are “poised to make [these billionaires] some of the country’s most influential people when it comes to shaping the November results.”

These billionaires in particular are funding everything from “nerdy political science experiments to divisive partisan news sites to rivalrous attempts to overhaul the party’s beleaguered data file.”

As Recode tells it, “Joe Biden has a problem. Silicon Valley billionaires think they have a solution.”

Recode identified four major players from Big Tech that have the “most ambitious plans”: Reid Hoffman, Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz, philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt.

Hoffman, in particular, stands out from the rest. OpenSecrets revealed that “political operations are pouring millions of ‘dark money’ dollars into ads and digital content masquerading as news coverage to influence the 2020 election.” One of those progressive operations is dubbed Courier Newsroom, which “has faced scrutiny for exploiting the collapse of local journalism to spread ‘hyperlocal partisan propaganda.’” Courier Newsroom is owned by the leftist nonprofit ACRONYM.

OpenSecrets reported that ACRONYM had “received financial backing from Investing in US, an investment vehicle funded by Silicon Valley donor and billionaire LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman.” Recode said that Hoffman’s “aides have indicated that setting up partisan news sites that masquerade as journalism is one of the priorities of its group of allied donors.” According to Recode, Hoffman has put around $10 million into ACRONYM.

But that isn’t all Hoffman has been up to. Recode reported that Hoffman invested “$18 million, his single-biggest bet this cycle,” in a political startup called Alloy.

Recode reported that “[t]he startup is attempting to build a warehouse to store the data that various progressive groups collect on voters and use it to try to get them to the polls.” Recode continued: “As part of its data acquisition, Alloy has bought some lists of voters’ cellphone numbers, a data source that people say Hoffman’s team, like other donors, sees as key this year due to the new need for digital campaigning.”

The former Google CEO Eric Schmidt is also getting heavily involved this cycle. Recode said Schmidt “has sunk money into the Democratic Data Exchange, a modest, competing effort by the Democratic National Committee to encourage data sharing by state parties to improve the party’s beleaguered digital backbone.” Recode interestingly assessed that Schmidt “may be working more closely with the party than Hoffman.”

Schmidt also had reportedly given a $4.7 million gift to the taxpayer-funded liberal outlet National Public Radio with his wife Wendy.

“This focus on ‘information distribution’ has also led many Silicon Valley donors, directly or indirectly, to fund projects like Pulso and PushBlack, which are quasi-journalistic plays focused on the Hispanic and African American communities, respectively,” Recode said. “Two things both Pulso and PushBlack also do? Register voters who are likely to be Democrats.”

Tech billionaires, “particularly Moskovitz and Powell Jobs,” are unleashing “millions into some of the country’s most ambitious voter-registration programs — almost all of it behind the scenes — hoping to emulate what worked for Democrats in 2018,” according to Recode. [Emphasis added.]

About a dozen voter-registration groups, which included failed Democratic Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams’s leftist group Fair Fight, gathered at Powell Jobs’s “Emerson Collective headquarters in mid-March to raise money for their 2020 plans, sources told Recode.”

For Moskovitz, his “North Star is a desire to nail the lowest ‘cost-per-net-Democratic-vote.’” Recode said “[t]hat’s largely led his team toward the funding of mail and voter-registration work.”

As Big Tech platform Twitter dips into editorializing Trump’s tweets, it appears that other billionaire liberals from Silicon Valley are not going to be sitting idly by for a repeat of the 2016 election outcome.

These people operate like a private Mafia that use our government as their plaything!

———————–

Witnesses, victims and informants are protected by: https://www.sos.ca.gov/registries/safe-home/  ; Public Domain use rights; Non-Commercial free information rights; Fair Use rights; Freedom of The Press; U.S. First Amendment; SLAPP; United Nations Human Rights Law – Per Amnesty International; GDPR; Privacy Tools At: http://privacytools.io; ACLU; ICIJ investigation group; State and Federal Constitutions; whistle-blower laws.

##############################################################

EVIDENCE EXAMPLES FROM THE CASE FILES, Click Each Link To View The Document –

Inside the NSA Secret Tool for Mapping Your Social Network And Knowing Everything You Do.html

She is Not Speaking For You – Nancy Pelosi Clan Are Owned By China.html

GREEN CORRUPTION.pdf

Corruption In The Department Of Energy .pdf

AAA WHO IS THE PALO ALTO MAFIA_ – #PaloAltoMafia.html

Another Way To Knock Corrupt Google Down To Size.html

The costly collateral damage from Elon Musk’s sociopath megalomaniac Starlink domestic spying satellite fleet.html

AAAAA THE KEY POINTS IN THESE INVESTIGATIONS Dept of Energy Slush Fund Stock Market Scam Corruption.html

How Google Attacks.html

EXPOSE_THE_MOBSTERS.html

1.5 BILLION sensitive files found exposed online dwarf Panama Papers leak and expose DNC crimes using Facebook and Google user data.html

A group of Silicon Valley and Hollywood monopolists walked into a bar___.html

Nobody On Earth Can Launder And Hide Cash Like Elon Musk.html

And Yet Another Lithium Ion Device exploded ‘like a rocket,’ left severe leg burns.html

Character Assassins Sidney Blumenthal And David Brock.html

AFGHAN LITHIUM SCAM: lithium.txt

An Investigation Of Solyndra And The Department Of Energy Disasters 1.5 – THE CLEANTECH CRASH ENERGY DEPT SLUSH FUND.pdf

Chaos Erupts At Tesla_ Stock Crashes, Bonds Implode After Heads Of Accounting, HR Quit.html

How_Google_And_Facebook_Put_Obama_In_The_White_House.html

Another Tesla car catches fire in Hong Kong parking lot: media – ALL TESLA BATTERIES EXPECTED TO HAVE CHEMISTRY DEGRADE AND EXPLODE.html

One Roadmap for Cases Against Google.pdf

Almost Every California Democrat Party Boss Has Been Involved In A Sick Sex Scandal.html

Companies co-founded by Nancy Pelosi son charged with securities fraud as huge green scam exposed.html

THE SILICON VALLEY MOB.html

EXPOSING CORRUPT OLIGARCHS.html

Cleantech Investing Gets Its Day in the Sun As Congressional Insiders Pump And Dump Like Mobsters.html

Another Elon Musk Failure

ANOTHER Democrat Sex Cult Exposed sexual servitude at San Francisco-based orgasmic meditation company.html

Capitalism v. Cronyism_ What’s the True Cost of a Tesla_.html

Tesla: Lies And Fraud Engulfed In Elon Musk’s Hubris.html

A History & Study of Electric Vehicles_ Inconvenient Truth About Electric Vehicles.html

Feinstein Corruption 1.2 – THE CLEANTECH CRASH ENERGY DEPT SLUSH FUND.pdf

ALL OF THESE CASES ARE CONNECTED. HERE IS HOW.html

Eric_Schmidt_Has_A_Psychotic_Need_To_Control_Governments_And_Society.html

California Senator who called for gun control gets 5 years in prison for weapons trafficking.html

HOW THE BRIBES WERE PAID IN THE CLEANTECH CRASH WITH GREEN CASH.pdf

$21 Trillion Lost_ Largest Theft in U.S. History No Politician Wants to Talk About.html

Planet of the Censoring Humans.html

Elon Musk Becomes #1 Covidiot By Exploiting Pandemic For Personal Promotion.html

Another Driver Died in a Tesla Autopilot.html

FORMAT FOR SUING GOOGLE.pdf

Apple covering-up exploding Lithium Ion iPhone 7 Plus after video of smoking handset goes viral.html

SOFTWARE THAT EXPOSES CROOKS IN PUBLIC OFFICE.html

Character Assassin David Brock from Media Matters Was Behind Lisa Bloom Effort.html

Corruption In The Department Of Energy- How Campaign Financiers Are Paid Off With Crony Cash.html

A female employee called Tesla factory a predator zone at a meeting where some workers described sexual harassment.html

Another Tesla Slams Into Tree In Florida, Bursting Into Flames And Killing Driver.html

Another Tesla goes off cliff in Santa Clara County, driver found dead.html

THE BIG DEAL 1.0 – THE CLEANTECH CRASH ENERGY DEPT SLUSH FUND.pdf

Investigation Of The Solyndra Department Of Energy Disaster.pdf

AAAA How Elon Musk, Larry Page and Mark Zuckerberg Use Scam Nonprofits to Hide Dark Money.html

Chair Of California Democratic Party Eric Bauman SEX ABUSE.html

GOOGLE_FEDERAL_COMPLAINT_NOTES_2020.pdf

THE CHARGES.pdf

Green-Energy, Crony-Corruption.pdf

Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program.html

An Inconvenient Truth For Silicon Valley Reveals That It Is Killing Society.html

CASE MEMO – Expanded Solyndra_Cleantech Case.html

FACEBOOK REFUSES TO HALT SEX TRAFFICKING BECAUSE TECH EXECUTIVES ARE INVOLVED IN IT.html

OBAMA USES GOOGLE AS A MEDIA ASSASSIN .pdf

When Google, Facebook And Netflix Tell You That Something Is ‘Trending’.html

EXPOSING_CORRUPT_OLIGARCHS.html

Another Veteran Disney Executive Arrested On Child Sex Abuse Charges.html

Crime-lord Goldman Sachs Ensnarled in Vast Fraud Scandal…AGAIN!.html

CORRUPTION IN AMERICA.html

Elon Musk proves that no government officials can stop his crimes and corruption.html

CORONAVIRUS COVID PANDEMIC TIPS.html

Unmasking.pdf

Calls For Steven Chu To Be Fired Over Solyndra Scandal.html

10 Ways Big Tech Can Shift Millions of Votes in the November Elections___Without Anyone Knowing.html

At liberal tech companies, those who disagree on politics are attacked and black-listed.html

BLACK CUBE.html

60 Minutes Exposes Elon Musk As Full Bore Arrogant Sociopath.html

A Huge Bunch Of Obama Energy Dept bankrupt companies were acquired by Dianne Feinstein Husband Chinese business partners .html

AMERICAN BIG NEWS OUTLETS FOUND TO BE TOTALLY FAKE AND PROPAGANDA FOR CORRUPT SENATORS.html

Another failed Tesla Autopilot steered car under semitruck at 68 mph as Tesla defects show up around the globe.html

Adrian Covert of Gawker, Gizmodo and CNN.html

Every Tech CEO And Investor In Silicon Valley Is A Predatory, Parasitic.html

The Malignant Narcissism And Cartel Climate Of Elon Musk And His Billionaire Frat Boy Club.html

Big Tech Billionaires Plotting Sweeping Secret Plans to Boost Joe Biden In Exchange For Crony Perks.html

Google faces $5 billion lawsuit in U.S. for tracking private internet use.html

ALL OF THE VIEWER NUMBERS ON YOUTUBE ARE FAKE, FAKE, FAKE!.html

Elon Musk is again proven to be a liar and scam artist in COVID ventilator fiasco.html

Google’s Secret SUBLIM-EX Technology Is Already Making You Think And Do Certain Things Without Your Knowledge Or Approval.html

AAAA THE ELON MUSK AND TESLA MOTORS FRAUD, STOCK RIGGING, BRIBERY AND SAFETY INVESTIGATIONS.html

Covington – Burling and Perkins – Coie law firms manipulated government to rig elections and public policy.html

Convinced that GOOGLE is firmly in bed with the Deep State_.html

Criminal cartel charges to be laid against Deutsche Bank.html

Another Tesla Model S engulfed in horrific fire in Poland.html

LESSONS NEVER LEARNED WHEN SENATORS OWN STOCKS.html

THE DEPT OF ENERGY INVESTIGATION BACKGROUND 3.0.pdf

EDWARD RING IS A HIRED SHILL FOR ELON MUSK.pdf

The Silicon Valley #MeToo Moment Didn’t Change Anything Because Venture Capitalists Are Sick Perverted Pigs.html

Mouthbreathing Machiavellis Dream of a Silicon Reich.html

AAAA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLE MANUFACTURING LOAN CORRUPTION.html

THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SLUSH FUND CORRUPTION CASE 2.pdf

60 Minutes Uncovers Pelosi Cleantech Insider Stock Trades.html

ANOTHER DAY, ANOTHER TESLA CRASH OR FIRE!.html

Crescent Dunes Solar Is Doomed as Taxpayers Pick Up the Tab For Another Dept of Energy Obama Payola Failure.html

Elon Musk proves that no government officials can stop his crimes.pdf

HOW OBAMA BUILT HIS SLUSH-FUND AT THE ENERGY DEPARTMENT.pdf

Antitrust should be used to break up partisan tech giants like Facebook, Google.html

After Hundreds Of Hacks U.S. Department Of Energy Finally Throws Out Their Cyber-security Boss.html

Tech companies say they value diversity, but reports show they lie and are inherently racist Stanford frat-boy elitist scams.html

AAA THE AWFUL TRUTH ABOUT GOOGLE Dept of Energy Slush Fund Stock Market Scam Corruption.html

companies that vanished.txt

ELON MUSK SUES FOR MORE TAXPAYER CASH.pdf

Intelligence Reform.html

THE FISKER PAYOLA.pdf

Who Did It First And Who Is ‘The Silicon Valley Cartel’?.html

CHARACTER ASSASSINS AND RETRIBUTION SERVICES AGENCY_ FUSION GPS.html

What would an insane tech oligarch do for trillions of dollars of criminal gain?.html

A whistleblower plays by the rules at CIA.html

Concealing the depth of Obamagate.html

A CEO just slammed Google for greed, censorship, corruption, and piracy (1).html

Even fed-up tech workers are paralyzed by Silicon Valley’s sick LOOK AT ME culture.html

Congress Just Gave More Tax Subsidies To Elon Musk___s Solar Company via Crooked John Podesta.html

Another Tesla Model S Caught On Fire At Supercharger Station In Shanghai.html

Another Black Man Has Died in the Home of Democratic Donor Ed Buck.html

ANTI_CORRUPTION_BATTLE_ON_BEHALF_OF_AMERICAN_CITIZENS.html

AAA THE SILICON VALLEY COLLUSION CARTEL Dept of Energy Slush Fund Stock Market Scam Corruption.html

Elon Musk Is A Sick Sociopath Who Hires Attackers To Get His Competitors.html

SILICON VALLEY’S COMPUTERIZED CRISIS MODELS ALWAYS TURN OUT TO BE CONTRIVED BS!.html

Character Assassin and Google Insider John Cook becomes the latest top Gawker cabin boy to exit Gizmodo Media Group.html

Cartels, Collusion and Price Fixing in Silicon Valley.html

Another Tesla Model S Bursts Into Flames After _Horrific_ Crash, Killing And Burning Alive Two Men Trapped Inside.html

FTC TASK FORCE REPORTS ON GOOGLE ABUSES.pdf

Edward Ring’s Paid Gig Kissing Elon Musk’s Ass.html

Sick Apple, Google And Facebook Use COVID To Legitimize Political Spying And To Profit Off Pandemic.html

When the Silicon Valley Frat Cartel Tried To Bury Outsiders, They Discovered That They Were Seeds.html

Department_Of_Energy_Financing.html

AAFINAL-DOE-Loan-Guarantees-Report – THE CLEANTECH CRASH ENERGY DEPT SLUSH FUND.pdf

Senator Insider Trading.m4v

A complete guide to how Elon Musk has raised, and then spent, billions of dollars..html

Corruption In The Department Of Energy 2.html

ANOTHER DEMOCRAT FINANCIER HAS ILLICIT SEX WITH A BOY AND THEN THE BOY ENDS UP DEAD!.html

AGENCY ABUSE AGAINST CITIZENS.txt

PELOSI MADE MILLIONS.html

Congress Gets Silicon Valley Cartel To Admit That Silicon Valley Rigs Elections.html

Absolute Proof Obama Rigged Elections.html

PERSONAL INTERNET SECURITY – Rev 4.pdf

Concerns About How Facebook And Other DNC Social Media Giants Manipulate The News Online (copy).html

Eric Schmidt Has A Psychotic Need To Control Governments And Society.html

ANOTHER CALIFORNIA CORRUPTION SCANDAL.html

Everybody at the riots is a naive kid who was sourced from THE BASE, Silicon Valley’s political riot engine.html

Nancy Pelosi And Feinstein Clan Are Owned By China.pdf

CORRUPT AND BIASED SILICON VALLEY TECH CARTEL GETS HATE FROM THE PUBLIC.html

How Google And Facebook Put Obama In The White House.html

The Cleantech Crash_HIGH.44.m4v

THE SILICON VALLEY PONZI SCHEME.pdf

Pelosi_Clan_Owned_By_China.html

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLE MANUFACTURING LOAN CORRUPTION.html

FEDERAL COURT DISCUSSION.pdf

GOOGLE_FEDERAL_COMPLAINT_NOTES_2020.html

SILICON VALLEY IS PAYING BRIBES TO CONGRESS VIA INSIDER TRADING AND IT IS KILLING AMERICA.html

SOFTWARE REVEALED THAT EXPOSES THE MOBSTERS IN THE U.S. CONGRESS.pdf

THE CORRUPTION.pdf

Can we wean Elon Musk off government support already_.html

Another Way That Google Rigs Elections_ Crowdstrike.html

Confirmation of Google Blacklisting Independent Media Websites.html

Another idiot Tesla driver caught SLEEPING behind wheel while driving on autopilot down Las Vegas highway.html

Characteristics of Silicon Valley Venture Capitalists and Tech CEO___s.html

Another Tesla on Autopilot Veers off New Jersey Highway, Strikes Curb and Signs_ Police.html

USA MUST BAN ALL COMPANIES WITH OFFSHORE TAX EVASIONS FROM STIMULUS FUNDS.html

Political_Corruption.m4v

Did Bill Gates Just Reveal the Reason Behind the Lock-Downs?.html

Tech billionaire CARTEL plotting sweeping, secret plans to manipulate national election.html

HOW CORRUPTION WORKS WITH GREEN ENERGY.pdf

ANOTHER GOOGLE WHISTLE-BLOWER EXPOSES DNC ECHO-CHAMBERING AT GOOGLE.html

 

Witnesses, victims and informants are protected by: https://www.sos.ca.gov/registries/safe-home/  ; Public Domain use rights; Non-Commercial free information rights; Fair Use rights; Freedom of The Press; U.S. First Amendment; SLAPP; United Nations Human Rights Law – Per Amnesty International; GDPR; Privacy Tools At: http://privacytools.io; ACLU; ICIJ investigation group; State and Federal Constitutions; whistle-blower laws.

 

REFERENCES AND CONFIRMING EVIDENCE FROM THIRD-PARTY SOURCES

Validation Note: University, Federal, Forensic Researcher and Journalism sources provided in the links below, prove every assertion in this report many times over. A simple web-search by any college-educated person, on the top 5 search engines, can turn up hundreds of additional credible, verifying sources. Expert jury trial and Congressional hearing witnesses have proven these facts over and over.

 

– second-by-second dangers and harms that modern electronics, like your phone and tablet, are causing to your life, your income, your privacy, your beliefs, your human rights, your bank account records, your political data, your job, your brand name, your medical data, your dating life, your reputation and other crucial parts of your life. 

– “if it has a plug, it has a bug”

– https://www.kurzweilai.net/reflected-hidden-faces-in-photographs-revealed-in-pupil )

– https://www.aclu.org/blog/privacy-technology/surveillance-technologies/apples-use-face-recognition-new-iphone )

– Face-tracking software for stalking you on Match.com and OK Cupid is more effective than even FBI software for hunting bank robbers ( https://www.cnet.com/news/clearview-app-lets-strangers-find-your-name-info-with-snap-of-a-photo-report-says/ )

– All your data from any hotel you stay at will eventually be hacked and leaked ( Info of 10 MILLION MGM guests including Justin Bieber and TWITTER CEO leaked online! )

– Your voting data will be used to spy on you and harm you ( Every voter in Israel just had their data leaked in 'grave' security breach... )

– Lip-reading software can determine what you are saying from over a mile away ( https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/01/20/russian-police-use-spy-camera-film-opposition-activist-bedroom/ )

– Every Apple iPhone and other smart-phone has over 1000 ways to bug you, listen to you, track you and record your daily activities even when you think you have turned off the device. Never leave your battery in your phone. ( LEAKED DOCS: Secretive Market For Your Web History... )(Every Search. Every Click. On Every Site… )

– Elon Musk’s SpaceX StarLink satellites are spy satellites that send your data to Google and other tech companies ( https://www.chieftain.com/news/20200118/first-drones-now-unexplained-lights-reported-in-horsetooth )

– Google and Facebook have all of your medical records and they are part of a political operation ( https://www.wsj.com/articles/hospitals-give-tech-giants-access-to-detailed-medical-records-11579516200 )

– Many of the companies you think are providing security are secretly owned by the Chinese government spy agencies or the CIA ( https://boingboing.net/2020/02/11/cia-secretly-owned-worlds-to.html )

– Every red light camera, Walmart/Target/Big Box camera and every restaurant camera goes off to networks that send your activities to credit companies, collection companies, political parties and government agencies ( 'Homeland Security' using location data from apps to track millions of people...

– If you don’t put fake ages, addresses, phone numbers and disposable email addresses on ANY form you fill out electronically, it will haunt you forever ( https://www.the-sun.com/news/284784/pornstar-data-breach-massive-leak-bank-details/ )

– Every train, plane and cruise line records you constantly and checks the covert pictures they take of you against global databases. Corporations grab your collateral private data that those Princess Cruises and United Airlines companies take and use them to build files on you ( https://www.silive.com/news/2020/01/report-new-app-can-id-strangers-with-a-single-photo.html )

– The people who say “nobody would be interested in me” are the most at risk because their naiveté puts them at the top-of-the-list for targeting and harvesting ( https://www.cnet.com/news/clearview-app-lets-strangers-find-your-name-info-with-snap-of-a-photo-report-says/ )

– The government can see every place you went to in the last year ( https://www.protocol.com/government-buying-location-data )

– Did you know that almost every dating and erotic site sends your most private life experiences and chat messages to Google’s and Facebook’s investors? https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-google-quietly-tracking-porn-you-watch-2019-7

– Those people who think: “I have nothing to worry about..I am not important” ARE the people who get hacked the most. Don’t let naivete be your downfall. (  https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/07/when-will-we-get-full-truth-about-how-and-why-government-using-facial-recognition )

Privacy watchdog under pressure to recommend facial recognition ban...

Alarming Rise of Smart Camera Networks…

AMAZON’s Ring Doorbell Secretly Shares Private User Data With FACEBOOK…

– If you don’t believe that every government hacks citizens in order to destroy the reputation of anyone who makes a public statement against the current party in power then read the public document at:  https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP89-01258R000100010002-4.pdf

– VICE NEWS Motherboard via public records request has revealed shocking details of capabilities of California law enforcement involved in Fusion Centers, once deemed to be a conspiracy theory like the National Security Agency (NSA) which was founded in 1952, and its existence hidden until the mid-1960s. “The guide doesn’t just show how Gotham works. It also shows how police are instructed to use the software,” writes Caroline Haskins. “This guide seems to be specifically made by Palantir for the California law enforcement because it includes examples specific to California.”

– Palantir is a private intelligence data management company mapping relationships between individuals and organizations alike founded by Peter Thiel and CEO Alex Karp and accused rapist Joe Lonsdale. You may remember Palantir from journalist Barrett Brown, Anonymous’ hack of HBGary, or accusations that the company provided the technology that enables NSA’s mass surveillance PRISM. Founded with early investment from the CIA and heavily used by the military, Palantir is a subcontracting company in its own right. The company has even been featured in the Senate’s grilling of Facebook, when Washington State Senator Maria Cantwell asked CEO Mark Zuckerberg, “Do you know who Palantir is?” due to Peter Thiel sitting on Facebook’s board.

– In 2011, Anonymous’ breach exposed HBGary’s plan, conceived along with data intelligence firm Palantir, and Berico Technologies, to retaliate against WikiLeaks with cyber attacks and threaten the journalism institutions supporters. Following the hack and exposure of the joint plot, Palantir attempted to distance itself from HBGary, which it blamed for the plot.

Bank of America/Palintir/HBGary combined WikiLeaks attack plan. You can find more here: https://t.co/85yECxFmZu pic.twitter.com/huNtfJp8gl

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) November 29, 2016

– This was in part because Palantir had in 2011 scored $250 million in deals ; its customers included the CIA, FBI, US Special Operations Command, Army, Marines, Air Force, LAPD and even the NYPD. So the shady contractor had its reputation to lose at the time being involved in arguably criminal activity against WikiLeaks and its supporters.

 

Police can then click on an individual in the chart within Gotham and see every personal detail about a target and those around them, from email addresses to bank account information, license information, social media profiles, etc., according to the documents.

– Palantir’s software in many ways is similar to the Prosecutor’s Management Information System (PROMIS) stolen software Main Core and may be the next evolution in that code, which allegedly predated PRISM. In 2008, Salon.com published details about a top-secret government database that might have been at the heart of the Bush administration’s domestic spying operations. The database known as “Main Core” reportedly collected and stored vast amounts of personal and financial data about millions of Americans in event of an emergency like Martial Law.

https://www.i-programmer.info/news/149-security/12556-google-says-spectre-and-meltdown-are-too-difficult-to-fix.html

https://sputniknews.com/us/201902231072681117-encryption-keys-dark-overlord-911-hack/

https://www.businessinsider.com/nest-microphone-was-never-supposed-to-be-a-secret-2019-2

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/430779-google-says-hidden-microphone-was-never-intended-to-be-a-secret

https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/71200/smartphone-apps-sending-intensely-personal-information-to-facebook–whether-or-not-you-have-an.html

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/microsoft-edge-secret-whitelist-allows-facebook-to-autorun-flash/

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19210727

https://www.davidicke.com/article/469484/israel-hardware-backdoored-everything

https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/2186606/chinas-social-credit-system-shows-its-teeth-banning-millions

https://youtu.be/lwoyesA-vlM

https://www.zdnet.com/article/critical-vulnerabilities-uncovered-in-popular-password-managers/

https://files.catbox.moe/jopll0.pdf

https://files.catbox.moe/ugqngv.pdf

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612974/once-hailed-as-unhackable-blockchains-are-now-getting-hacked/

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/02/att-t-mobile-sprint-reportedly-broke-us-law-by-selling-911-location-data/

https://theintercept.com/2019/02/08/jeff-bezos-protests-the-invasion-of-his-privacy-as-amazon-builds-a-sprawling-surveillance-state-for-everyone-else/

https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/71200/smartphone-apps-sending-intensely-personal-information-to-facebook–whether-or-not-you-have-an.html

https://www.stripes.com/news/us/feds-share-watch-list-with-1-400-private-groups-1.569308

https://voat.co/v/news/3053329

https://www.zdnet.com/article/all-intel-chips-open-to-new-spoiler-non-spectre-attack-dont-expect-a-quick-fix/

https://voat.co/v/technology/3075724

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/02/26/malware_ibm_powershell/

https://fossbytes.com/facebook-lets-anyone-view-your-profile-using-your-phone-number/

https://www.iottechtrends.com/vulnerability-ring-doorbell-fixed/

https://voat.co/v/technology/3077896

https://www.mintpressnews.com/whistleblowers-say-nsa-still-spies-american-phones-hidden-program/256208/

https://www.wionews.com/photos/how-israel-spyware-firm-nso-operates-in-shadowy-cyber-world-218782#hit-in-mexico-218759

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/whatsapp-hack-latest-breach-personal-data-security-135037749.html

https://metro.co.uk/2019/05/14/whatsapp-security-attack-put-malicious-code-iphones-androids-9523698/

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/9069211/whatsapp-surveillance-cyber-attack-glitch/

http://www.learnliberty.org/videos/edward-snowden-surveillance-is-about-power/

 

 

https://panopticlick.eff.org/

https://www.grc.com/shieldsup

https://cheapskatesguide.org/articles/ip-check.info?/lang=en

https://secureswissdata.com/9-ways-government-spying-on-internet-activity/

https://www.eteknix.com/nsa-may-backdoors-built-intel-amd-processors/

https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/a-brief-history-of-the-nsa-attempting-to-insert-backdoors-into-encrypted-data )
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/new_york_times_post_office_photocopies_envelopes_of_all_mail_sent_in_the_us/ )

https://khn.org/news/a-wake-up-call-on-data-collecting-smart-beds-and-sleep-apps/

https://www.wsj.com/articles/hackers-may-soon-be-able-to-tell-what-youre-typingjust-by-hearing-you-type-11559700120

https://sputniknews.com/science/201906051075646555-chinese-cyborg-future-chip/

https://www.emarketer.com/content/average-us-time-spent-with-mobile-in-2019-has-increased

https://www.baltimoresun.com/maryland/baltimore-city/bs-md-ci-ransomware-20190603-story.html

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/447532-news-industry-joins-calls-for-more-scrutiny-of-big-tech

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/the-future-will-be-recorded-on-your-smart-speaker-1.1270598

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/9/robert-mueller-exploited-cell-phone-gps-track-trum/

https://www.theorganicprepper.com/the-unholy-alliance-between-dna-sites-and-facial-recognition/

 

Tech companies often treat user privacy as a low-priority afterthought and will only make changes if user outrage forces their hand:

https://archive.is/WXOD5

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/07/11/google_assistant_voice_eavesdropping_creepy/

https://www.technowize.com/google-home-is-sending-your-private-recordings-to-google-workers/

https://phys.org/news/2019-07-malicious-apps-infect-million-android.html

https://archive.fo/RrnuL#selection-1489.0-1489.170

https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-stirs-suspicions-by-adding-telemetry-files-to-security-only-update/

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2019/07/07/fbi-ice-use-driver-license-photos-without-owners-knowledge-consent/WmDbiCrNNWaWQrVrp7q3CL/story.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/07/08/tfl-begins-tracking-london-underground-commuters-using-wi-fi/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fbi-ice-find-state-drivers-license-photos-are-a-gold-mine-for-facial-recognition-searches/ar-AADZk0d

 

Dan Goodin Dan is the Security Editor at Ars Technica, which he joined in 2012 after working for The Register, the Associated Press, Bloomberg News, and other publications.

Per the different reports in Russian media, the files indicate that SyTech had worked since 2009 on a multitude of projects since 2009 for FSB unit 71330 and for fellow contractor Quantum. Projects include:

• Nautilus – a project for collecting data about EVERY social media and dating site user (such as Facebook, Match.com, OKCUPID, Plenty of Fish )MySpace, and LinkedIn).
• Nautilus-S – a project for deanonymizing Tor traffic with the help of rogue Tor servers.
• Reward – a project to covertly penetrate P2P networks, like the one used for torrents.
• Mentor – a project to monitor and search email communications on the servers of Russian companies.
• Hope – a project to investigate the topology of the Russian internet and how it connects to other countries’ network.
• Tax-3 – a project for the creation of a closed intranet to store the information of highly-sensitive state figures, judges, and local administration officials, separate from the rest of the state’s IT networks.

BBC Russia, who received the full trove of documents, claims there were other older projects for researching other network protocols such as Jabber (instant messaging), ED2K (eDonkey), and OpenFT (enterprise file transfer).

 

 

• Anne Broache. “FBI wants widespread monitoring of ‘illegal’ Internet activity”. CNET. Retrieved 25 March 2014.

• “Is the U.S. Turning Into a Surveillance Society?”. American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• “Bigger Monster, Weaker Chains: The Growth of an American Surveillance Society” (PDF). American Civil Liberties Union. January 15, 2003. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• “Anonymous hacks UK government sites over ‘draconian surveillance’ “, Emil Protalinski, ZDNet, 7 April 2012, retrieved 12 March 2013

• Hacktivists in the frontline battle for the internet retrieved 17 June 2012

• Diffie, Whitfield; Susan Landau (August 2008). “Internet Eavesdropping: A Brave New World of Wiretapping”. Scientific American. Retrieved 2009-03-13.

• “CALEA Archive — Electronic Frontier Foundation”. Electronic Frontier Foundation (website). Archived from the original on 2009-05-03. Retrieved 2009-03-14.

• “CALEA: The Perils of Wiretapping the Internet”. Electronic Frontier Foundation (website). Retrieved 2009-03-14.

• “CALEA: Frequently Asked Questions”. Electronic Frontier Foundation (website). Retrieved 2009-03-14.

• Kevin J. Connolly (2003). Law of Internet Security and Privacy. Aspen Publishers. p. 131. ISBN .

• American Council on Education vs. FCC Archived 2012-09-07 at the Wayback Machine, Decision, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, 9 June 2006. Retrieved 8 September 2013.

• Hill, Michael (October 11, 2004). “Government funds chat room surveillance research”. USA Today. Associated Press. Retrieved 2009-03-19.

• McCullagh, Declan (January 30, 2007). “FBI turns to broad new wiretap method”. ZDNet News. Retrieved 2009-03-13.

• “First round in Internet war goes to Iranian intelligence”, Debkafile, 28 June 2009. (subscription required)

• O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. O’Reilly Media, 1-5.

• Fuchs, C. (2011). New Media, Web 2.0 and Surveillance. Sociology Compass, 134-147.

• Fuchs, C. (2011). Web 2.0, Presumption, and Surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 289-309.

• Anthony Denise, Celeste Campos-Castillo, Christine Horne (2017). “Toward a Sociology of Privacy”. Annual Review of Sociology. 43: 249–269. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053643.

• Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Demsmarais, S. (2014). ” Creeping” or just information seeking? Gender differences in partner monitoring in response to jealousy on Facebook. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 35-50.

• “How Stuff Works”. Retrieved November 10, 2017.

• [electronics.howstuffworks.com/gadgets/high-tech-gadgets/should-smart-devices-automatically-call-cops.htm. “How Stuff Works”] Check |url= value (help). Retrieved November 10, 2017.

• [time.com/4766611/alexa-takes-the-stand-listening-devices-raise-privacy-issues “Time Alexa Takes the Stand Listening Devices Raise Privacy Issues”] Check |url= value (help). Retrieved November 10, 2017.

• Story, Louise (November 1, 2007). “F.T.C. to Review Online Ads and Privacy”. New York Times. Retrieved 2009-03-17.

• Butler, Don (January 31, 2009). “Are we addicted to being watched?”. The Ottawa Citizen. canada.com. Archived from the original on 22 July 2013. Retrieved 26 May 2013.

• Soghoian, Chris (September 11, 2008). “Debunking Google’s log anonymization propaganda”. CNET News. Retrieved 2009-03-21.

• Joshi, Priyanki (March 21, 2009). “Every move you make, Google will be watching you”. Business Standard. Retrieved 2009-03-21.

• “Advertising and Privacy”. Google (company page). 2009. Retrieved 2009-03-21.

• “Spyware Workshop: Monitoring Software on Your OC: Spywae, Adware, and Other Software”, Staff Report, U.S. Federal Trade Commission, March 2005. Retrieved 7 September 2013.

• Aycock, John (2006). Computer Viruses and Malware. Springer. ISBN .

• “Office workers give away passwords for a cheap pen”, John Leyden, The Register, 8 April 2003. Retrieved 7 September 2013.

• “Passwords are passport to theft”, The Register, 3 March 2004. Retrieved 7 September 2013.

• “Social Engineering Fundamentals, Part I: Hacker Tactics”, Sarah Granger, 18 December 2001.

• “Stuxnet: How does the Stuxnet worm spread?”. Antivirus.about.com. 2014-03-03. Retrieved 2014-05-17.

• Keefe, Patrick (March 12, 2006). “Can Network Theory Thwart Terrorists?”. New York Times. Retrieved 14 March 2009.

• Albrechtslund, Anders (March 3, 2008). “Online Social Networking as Participatory Surveillance”. First Monday. 13 (3). Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Fuchs, Christian (2009). Social Networking Sites and the Surveillance Society. A Critical Case Study of the Usage of studiVZ, Facebook, and MySpace by Students in Salzburg in the Context of Electronic Surveillance (PDF). Salzburg and Vienna: Forschungsgruppe Unified Theory of Information. ISBN . Archived from the original (PDF) on February 6, 2009. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Ethier, Jason (27 May 2006). “Current Research in Social Network Theory” (PDF). Northeastern University College of Computer and Information Science. Retrieved 15 March 2009.[permanent dead link]

• Marks, Paul (June 9, 2006). “Pentagon sets its sights on social networking websites”. New Scientist. Retrieved 2009-03-16.

• Kawamoto, Dawn (June 9, 2006). “Is the NSA reading your MySpace profile?”. CNET News. Retrieved 2009-03-16.

• Ressler, Steve (July 2006). “Social Network Analysis as an Approach to Combat Terrorism: Past, Present, and Future Research”. Homeland Security Affairs. II (2). Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• McNamara, Joel (4 December 1999). “Complete, Unofficial Tempest Page”. Archived from the original on 1 September 2013. Retrieved 7 September 2013.

• Van Eck, Wim (1985). “Electromagnetic Radiation from Video Display Units: An Eavesdropping Risk?” (PDF). Computers & Security. 4 (4): 269–286. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.35.1695. doi:10.1016/0167-4048(85)90046-X.

• Kuhn, M.G. (26–28 May 2004). “Electromagnetic Eavesdropping Risks of Flat-Panel Displays” (PDF). 4th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Toronto: 23–25.

• Asonov, Dmitri; Agrawal, Rakesh (2004), Keyboard Acoustic Emanations (PDF), IBM Almaden Research Center

• Yang, Sarah (14 September 2005), “Researchers recover typed text using audio recording of keystrokes”, UC Berkeley News

• “LA Times”. Retrieved November 10, 2017.

• Adi Shamir & Eran Tromer. “Acoustic cryptanalysis”. Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University. Retrieved 1 November 2011.

• Jeremy Reimer (20 July 2007). “The tricky issue of spyware with a badge: meet ‘policeware'”. Ars Technica.

• Hopper, D. Ian (4 May 2001). “FBI’s Web Monitoring Exposed”. ABC News.

• “New York Times”. Retrieved November 10, 2017.

• “Stanford University Clipper Chip”. Retrieved November 10, 2017.

• “Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act” Archived 2012-02-14 at the Wayback Machine, U.S. Senate bill S.2048, 107th Congress, 2nd session, 21 March 2002. Retrieved 8 September 2013.

• “Swiss coder publicises government spy Trojan”. News.techworld.com. Retrieved 25 March 2014.

• Basil Cupa, Trojan Horse Resurrected: On the Legality of the Use of Government Spyware (Govware), LISS 2013, pp. 419-428

• “FAQ – Häufig gestellte Fragen”. Ejpd.admin.ch. 2011-11-23. Archived from the original on 2013-05-06. Retrieved 2014-05-17.

• “Censorship is inseparable from surveillance”, Cory Doctorow, The Guardian, 2 March 2012

• “Trends in transition from classical censorship to Internet censorship: selected country overviews”

• The Enemies of the Internet Special Edition : Surveillance Archived 2013-08-31 at the Wayback Machine, Reporters Without Borders, 12 March 2013

• “When Secrets Aren’t Safe With Journalists”, Christopher Soghoian, New York Times, 26 October 2011

• Everyone’s Guide to By-passing Internet Censorship, The Citizen Lab, University of Toronto, September 2007

• Stalker used pop idol’s pupil image reflections in selfie to find location…

• https://www.slashfilm.com/netflix-physical-activity-tracking/

• https://www.technologyreview.com/s/614034/facebook-is-funding-brain-experiments-to-create-a-device-that-reads-your-mind/

• https://www.stratfor.com/

• https://www.acxiom.com/what-we-do/risk-solutions/

• https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/contact-center/unified-intelligence-center/index.html

• https://www.fireeye.com/

• Diffie, Whitfield; Susan Landau (August 2008). “Internet Eavesdropping: A Brave New World of Wiretapping”. Scientific American. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• “CALEA Archive – Electronic Frontier Foundation”. Electronic Frontier Foundation (website). Archived from the original on May 3, 2009. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• “CALEA: The Perils of Wiretapping the Internet”. Electronic Frontier Foundation (website). Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• “CALEA: Frequently Asked Questions”. Electronic Frontier Foundation (website). September 20, 2007. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Hill, Michael (October 11, 2004). “Government funds chat room surveillance research”. USA Today. Associated Press. Retrieved March 19, 2009.

• McCullagh, Declan (January 30, 2007). “FBI turns to broad new wiretap method”. ZDNet News. Retrieved September 26, 2014.

• “FBI’s Secret Spyware Tracks Down Teen Who Made Bomb Threats”. Wired Magazine. July 18, 2007.

• Van Eck, Wim (1985). “Electromagnetic Radiation from Video Display Units: An Eavesdropping Risk?” (PDF). Computers & Security. 4 (4): 269–286. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.35.1695. doi:10.1016/0167-4048(85)90046-X.

• Kuhn, M.G. (2004). “Electromagnetic Eavesdropping Risks of Flat-Panel Displays” (PDF). 4th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies: 23–25.

• Risen, James; Lichtblau, Eric (June 16, 2009). “E-Mail Surveillance Renews Concerns in Congress”. New York Times. pp. A1. Retrieved June 30, 2009.

• Ambinder, Marc (June 16, 2009). “Pinwale And The New NSA Revelations”. The Atlantic. Retrieved June 30, 2009.

• Greenwald; Ewen, Glen; MacAskill (June 6, 2013). “NSA Prism program taps in to user data of Apple, Google and others” (PDF). The Guardian. Retrieved February 1, 2017.

• Sottek, T.C.; Kopfstein, Janus (July 17, 2013). “Everything you need to know about PRISM”. The Verge. Retrieved February 13, 2017.

• Singel, Ryan (September 10, 2007). “Rogue FBI Letters Hint at Phone Companies’ Own Data Mining Programs – Updated”. Threat Level. Wired. Retrieved March 19, 2009.

• Roland, Neil (March 20, 2007). “Mueller Orders Audit of 56 FBI Offices for Secret Subpoenas”. Bloomberg News. Retrieved March 19, 2009.

• Piller, Charles; Eric Lichtblau (July 29, 2002). “FBI Plans to Fight Terror With High-Tech Arsenal”. LA Times. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Schneier, Bruce (December 5, 2006). “Remotely Eavesdropping on Cell Phone Microphones”. Schneier On Security. Retrieved December 13, 2009.

• McCullagh, Declan; Anne Broache (December 1, 2006). “FBI taps cell phone mic as eavesdropping tool”. CNet News. Archived from the original on November 10, 2013. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Odell, Mark (August 1, 2005). “Use of mobile helped police keep tabs on suspect”. Financial Times. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• “Telephones”. Western Regional Security Office (NOAA official site). 2001. Retrieved March 22, 2009.

• “Can You Hear Me Now?”. ABC News: The Blotter. Archived from the original on August 25, 2011. Retrieved December 13, 2009.

• Coughlin, Kevin (December 13, 2006). “Even if they’re off, cellphones allow FBI to listen in”. The Seattle Times. Retrieved December 14, 2009.

• Hampton, Brittany (2012). “From Smartphones to Stingrays: Can the Fourth Amendment Keep up with the Twenty-First Century Note”. University of Louisville Law Review. Fifty One: 159–176 – via Law Journal Library.

• “Tracking a suspect by mobile phone”. BBC News. August 3, 2005. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Miller, Joshua (March 14, 2009). “Cell Phone Tracking Can Locate Terrorists – But Only Where It’s Legal”. FOX News. Archived from the original on March 18, 2009. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Samuel, Ian (2008). “Warrantless Location Tracking”. N.Y.U. Law Review. SSRN 1092293.

• Zetter, Kim (December 1, 2009). “Threat Level Privacy, Crime and Security Online Feds ‘Pinged’ Sprint GPS Data 8 Million Times Over a Year”. Wired Magazine: Threat Level. Retrieved December 5, 2009.

• “Greenstone Digital Library Software”. snowdenarchive.cjfe.org. Retrieved June 3, 2017.

• Sanger, David (September 26, 2014). “Signaling Post-Snowden Era, New iPhone Locks Out N.S.A”. New York Times. Retrieved November 1, 2014.

• Gellman, Barton (December 4, 2013). “NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden documents show”. The Washington Post. Retrieved November 1, 2014.

• Nye, James (October 26, 2014). “British spies can go through Americans’ telephone calls and emails without warrant revelas legal challenge in the UK”. Mail Online. Retrieved November 1, 2014.

• “Rise of Surveillance Camera Installed Base Slows”. May 5, 2016. Retrieved January 5, 2017.

• “Smart cameras catch man in 60,000 crowd”. BBC News. April 13, 2018. Retrieved April 13, 2018.

• Spielman, Fran (February 19, 2009). “Surveillance cams help fight crime, city says”. Chicago Sun Times. Retrieved March 13, 2009.[permanent dead link]

• Schorn, Daniel (September 6, 2006). “We’re Watching: How Chicago Authorities Keep An Eye On The City”. CBS News. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• “The Price of Privacy: How local authorities spent £515m on CCTV in four years” (PDF). Big Brother Watch. February 2012. p. 30. Retrieved February 4, 2015.

• “FactCheck: how many CCTV cameras?”. Channel 4 News. June 18, 2008. Retrieved May 8, 2009.

• “You’re being watched: there’s one CCTV camera for every 32 people in UK – Research shows 1.85m machines across Britain, most of them indoors and privately operated”. The Guardian. March 2, 2011. Retrieved January 7, 2017; “In the press: How the media is reporting the 1.85 million cameras story”. Security News Desk. March 3, 2011. Retrieved January 7, 2017.

• “CCTV in London” (PDF). Retrieved July 22, 2009.

• “How many cameras are there?”. CCTV User Group. June 18, 2008. Archived from the original on October 23, 2008. Retrieved May 8, 2009.

• Den Haag. “Camera surveillance”. Archived from the original on October 8, 2016. Retrieved December 2, 2016.

• Klein, Naomi (May 29, 2008). “China’s All-Seeing Eye”. Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on March 26, 2009. Retrieved March 20, 2009.

• “Big Brother To See All, Everywhere”. CBS News. Associated Press. July 1, 2003. Retrieved September 26, 2014.

• Bonsor, K. (September 4, 2001). “How Facial Recognition Systems Work”. Retrieved June 18, 2006.

• McNealy, Scott. “Privacy is (Virtually) Dead”. Retrieved December 24, 2006.

• Roebuck, Kevin (October 24, 2012). Communication Privacy Management. ISBN .

• “WIKILEAKS: Surveillance Cameras Around The Country Are Being Used In A Huge Spy Network”. Retrieved October 5, 2016.

• “EPIC Video Surveillance Information Page”. EPIC. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• Hedgecock, Sarah (August 14, 2012). “TrapWire: The Less-Than-Advertised System To Spy On Americans”. The Daily Beast. Retrieved September 13, 2012.

• Keefe, Patrick (March 12, 2006). “Can Network Theory Thwart Terrorists?”. New York Times.

• Albrechtlund, Anders (March 3, 2008). “Online Social Networking as Participatory Surveillance”. First Monday. 13 (3). Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Fuchs, Christian (2009). Social Networking Sites and the Surveillance Society. A Critical Case Study of the Usage of studiVZ, Facebook, and MySpace by Students in Salzburg in the Context of Electronic Surveillance (PDF). Salzburg and Vienna: Forschungsgruppe Unified Theory of Information. ISBN . Retrieved July 28, 2012.

• Ethier, Jason. “Current Research in Social Network Theory”. Northeastern University College of Computer and Information Science. Archived from the original on November 16, 2004. Retrieved March 15, 2009.

• Marks, Paul (June 9, 2006). “Pentagon sets its sights on social networking websites”. New Scientist. Retrieved March 16, 2009.

• Kawamoto, Dawn (June 9, 2006). “Is the NSA reading your MySpace profile?”. CNET News. Retrieved March 16, 2009.

• Ethier, Jason. “Current Research in Social Network Theory”. Northeastern University College of Computer and Information Science. Archived from the original on February 26, 2015. Retrieved March 15, 2009.

• Ressler, Steve (July 2006). “Social Network Analysis as an Approach to Combat Terrorism: Past, Present, and Future Research”. Homeland Security Affairs. II (2). Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• “DyDAn Research Blog”. DyDAn Research Blog (official blog of DyDAn). Retrieved December 20, 2009.

• Singel, Ryan (October 29, 2007). “AT&T Invents Programming Language for Mass Surveillance”. Threat Level. Wired. Retrieved March 19, 2009.

• Singel, Ryan (October 16, 2007). “Legally Questionable FBI Requests for Calling Circle Info More Widespread than Previously Known”. Threat Level. Wired. Retrieved March 19, 2009.

• Havenstein, Heather (September 12, 2008). “One in five employers uses social networks in hiring process”. Computer World. Archived from the original on September 23, 2008. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Woodward, John; Christopher Horn; Julius Gatune; Aryn Thomas (2003). Biometrics: A Look at Facial Recognition. RAND Corporation. ISBN . Retrieved March 15, 2009.

• Frank, Thomas (May 10, 2007). “Face recognition next in terror fight”. USA Today. Retrieved March 16, 2009.

• Vlahos, James (January 2008). “Surveillance Society: New High-Tech Cameras Are Watching You”. Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on December 19, 2007. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Nakashima, Ellen (December 22, 2007). “FBI Prepares Vast Database Of Biometrics: $1 Billion Project to Include Images of Irises and Faces”. Washington Post. pp. A01. Retrieved May 6, 2009.

• Arena, Kelly; Carol Cratty (February 4, 2008). “FBI wants palm prints, eye scans, tattoo mapping”. CNN. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Gross, Grant (February 13, 2008). “Lockheed wins $1 billion FBI biometric contract”. IDG News Service. InfoWorld. Retrieved March 18, 2009.

• “LAPD: We Know That Mug”. Wired Magazine. Associated Press. December 26, 2004. Retrieved March 18, 2009.

• Mack, Kelly. “LAPD Uses Face Recognition Technology To Fight Crime”. NBC4 TV (transcript from Officer.com). Archived from the original on March 30, 2010. Retrieved December 20, 2009.

• Willon, Phil (September 17, 2009). “LAPD opens new high-tech crime analysis center”. LA Times. Retrieved December 20, 2009.

• Dotinga, Randy (October 14, 2004). “Can’t Hide Your Lying … Face?”. Wired Magazine. Retrieved March 18, 2009.

• Boyd, Ryan. “MQ-9 Reaper”. Retrieved October 5, 2016.

• Friedersdorf, Conor (March 10, 2016). “The Rapid Rise of Federal Surveillance Drones Over America”. Retrieved October 5, 2016.

• Edwards, Bruce, “Killington co-founder Sargent dead at 83” Archived September 4, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, Rutland Herald, November 9, 2012. Retrieved December 10, 2012.

• McCullagh, Declan (March 29, 2006). “Drone aircraft may prowl U.S. skies”. CNet News. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Warwick, Graham (June 12, 2007). “US police experiment with Insitu, Honeywell UAVs”. FlightGlobal.com. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• La Franchi, Peter (July 17, 2007). “UK Home Office plans national police UAV fleet”. Flight International. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• “No Longer Science Fiction: Less Than Lethal & Directed Energy Weapons”. International Online Defense Magazine. February 22, 2005. Retrieved March 15, 2009.

• “HART Overview” (PDF). IPTO (DARPA) – Official website. August 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 5, 2008. Retrieved March 15, 2009.

• “BAA 04-05-PIP: Heterogeneous Airborne Reconnaissance Team (HART)” (PDF). Information Processing Technology Office (DARPA) – Official Website. December 5, 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 27, 2008. Retrieved March 16, 2009.

• Sirak, Michael (November 29, 2007). “DARPA, Northrop Grumman Move Into Next Phase of UAV Control Architecture”. Defense Daily. Archived from the original on March 9, 2012. Retrieved March 16, 2009.

• Saska, M.; Chudoba, J.; Preucil, L.; Thomas, J.; Loianno, G.; Tresnak, A.; Vonasek, V.; Kumar, V. Autonomous Deployment of Swarms of Micro-Aerial Vehicles in Cooperative Surveillance. In Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). 2014.

• Saska, M.; Vakula, J.; Preucil, L. Swarms of Micro Aerial Vehicles Stabilized Under a Visual Relative Localization. In ICRA2014: Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2014.

• Anthony, Denise (2017). “Toward a Sociology of Privacy”. Annual Review of Sociology. 43 (1): 249–269. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053643.

• Hildebrandt, Mireille; Serge Gutwirth (2008). Profiling the European Citizen: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer. ISBN .

• Clayton, Mark (February 9, 2006). “US Plans Massive Data Sweep”. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• Flint, Lara (September 24, 2003). “Administrative Subpoenas for the FBI: A Grab for Unchecked Executive Power”. The Center For Democracy & Technology (official site). Archived from the original on March 8, 2009. Retrieved March 20, 2009.

• “”National Network” of Fusion Centers Raises Specter of COINTELPRO”. EPIC Spotlight on Surveillance. June 2007. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• anonymous (January 26, 2006). “Information on the Confidential Source in the Auburn Arrests”. Portland Indymedia. Archived from the original on December 5, 2008. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• Myers, Lisa (December 14, 2005). “Is the Pentagon spying on Americans?”. NBC Nightly News. msnbc.com. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• “The Use of Informants in FBI Domestic Intelligence Investigations”. Final Report: Book III, Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans. U.S. Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. April 23, 1976. pp. 225–270. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• “Secret Justice: Criminal Informants and America’s Underground Legal System | Prison Legal News”. www.prisonlegalnews.org. Retrieved October 5, 2016.

• Ross, Brian (July 25, 2007). “FBI Proposes Building Network of U.S. Informants”. Blotter. ABC News. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• “U.S. Reconnaissance Satellites: Domestic Targets”. National Security Archive. Retrieved March 16, 2009.

• Block, Robert (August 15, 2007). “U.S. to Expand Domestic Use Of Spy Satellites”. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• Gorman, Siobhan (October 1, 2008). “Satellite-Surveillance Program to Begin Despite Privacy Concerns”. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved March 16, 2009.

• “Fact Sheet: National Applications Office”. Department of Homeland Security (official website). August 15, 2007. Archived from the original on March 11, 2009. Retrieved March 16, 2009.

• Warrick, Joby (August 16, 2007). “Domestic Use of Spy Satellites To Widen”. Washington Post. pp. A01. Retrieved March 17, 2009.

• Shrader, Katherine (September 26, 2004). “Spy imagery agency watching inside U.S.” USA Today. Associated Press. Retrieved March 17, 2009.

• Kappeler, Victor. “Forget the NSA: Police May be a Greater Threat to Privacy”.

• “Section 100i – IMS I-Catcher” (PDF), The German Code Of Criminal Procedure, 2014, pp. 43–44, archived from the original (PDF) on September 25, 2015, retrieved November 27, 2015

• “Two Stories Highlight the RFID Debate”. RFID Journal. July 19, 2005. Retrieved March 23, 2012.

• Lewan, Todd (July 21, 2007). “Microchips in humans spark privacy debate”. USA Today. Associated Press. Retrieved March 17, 2009.

• McCullagh, Declan (January 13, 2003). “RFID Tags: Big Brother in small packages”. CNET News. Retrieved July 24, 2012.

• Gardener, W. David (July 15, 2004). “RFID Chips Implanted In Mexican Law-Enforcement Workers”. Information Week. Retrieved March 17, 2009.

• Campbell, Monica (August 4, 2004). “Law enforcement in Mexico goes a bit bionic”. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved March 17, 2009.

• Lyman, D., Micheal. Criminal Investigation: The Art and the Science. 6th ed. Pearson, 2010. p249

• Crowder, Stan, and Turvery E. Brent. Ethical Justice: Applied Issues for Criminal Justice Students and Professionals. 1st ed. Academic Press, 2013. p150. Print.

• Claburn, Thomas (March 4, 2009). “Court Asked To Disallow Warrantless GPS Tracking”. Information Week. Retrieved March 18, 2009.

• Hilden, Julie (April 16, 2002). “What legal questions are the new chip implants for humans likely to raise?”. CNN.com (FindLaw). Retrieved March 17, 2009.

• Wolf, Paul. “COINTELPRO”. (online collection of historical documents). Retrieved March 14, 2009.

• “U.S. Army Intelligence Activities” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 8, 2015. Retrieved 25 May 2015.

• “Domestic CIA and FBI Mail Opening Programs” (PDF). Final Report: Book III, Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans. U.S. Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. April 23, 1976. pp. 559–678. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 5, 2011. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

• Goldstein, Robert (2001). Political Repression in Modern America. University of Illinois Press. ISBN .

• Hauser, Cindy E.; McCarthy, Michael A. (July 1, 2009). “Streamlining ‘search and destroy’: cost-effective surveillance for invasive species management”. Ecology Letters. 12 (7): 683–692. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01323.x. ISSN 1461-0248. PMID 19453617.

• Holden, Matthew H.; Nyrop, Jan P.; Ellner, Stephen P. (June 1, 2016). “The economic benefit of time-varying surveillance effort for invasive species management”. Journal of Applied Ecology. 53 (3): 712–721. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12617. ISSN 1365-2664.

• Flewwelling, Peter; Nations, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United (January 1, 2003). Recent Trends in Monitoring Control and Surveillance Systems for Capture Fisheries. Food & Agriculture Org. ISBN .

• Yang, Rong; Ford, Benjamin; Tambe, Milind; Lemieux, Andrew (January 1, 2014). Adaptive Resource Allocation for Wildlife Protection Against Illegal Poachers. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems. AAMAS ’14. Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. pp. 453–460. ISBN .

• Mörner, T.; Obendorf, D. L.; Artois, M.; Woodford, M. H. (April 1, 2002). “Surveillance and monitoring of wildlife diseases”. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics). 21 (1): 67–76. doi:10.20506/rst.21.1.1321. ISSN 0253-1933. PMID 11974631.

• Deviant Behaviour – Socially accepted observation of behaviour for security, Jeroen van Rest

• Sprenger, Polly (January 26, 1999). “Sun on Privacy: ‘Get Over It'”. Wired Magazine. Retrieved March 20, 2009.

• Baig, Edward; Marcia Stepanek; Neil Gross (April 5, 1999). “Privacy”. Business Week. Archived from the original on October 17, 2008. Retrieved March 20, 2009.

• Solove, Daniel (2007). “‘I’ve Got Nothing to Hide’ and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy”. San Diego Law Review. 44: 745. SSRN 998565.

• “Is the U.S. Turning Into a Surveillance Society?”. American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved March 13, 2009.