‘-POOP Tornado strikes Washington DC. “WIPES” out all credibility

‘-POOP Tornado strikes Washington DC. “WIPES” out all credibility

POOP Tornado strikes Washington DC. “WIPES” out all credibility

The Federal Agencies seem to be swirling down a toilet of corruption and mismanagement.

– The Department of the Interior sold our wild mustangs to Burger King slaughterhouses in between the sex scandals with oil companies.

– The Department of Energy took all of the taxpayer money and gave it to campaign backers in an organized crime kick-back scheme

– The State Department can’t tell its butt from a hole in the ground and does non-stop Benghazi story switcheroo’s and uses Israel as a ploy to protect Chevron’s middle east oil fields, thus causing wars.

– The CDC keeps death bug viruses in Aunt Nelllies cookie jar and, even then, looses them.

– The VA is killing veterans faster than it can save them.

– The HHS built a health computer system that was the biggest technology failure in HUMAN HISTORY and STILL ISNT FIXED!

– The IRS turns out to just be a front for White House hits on people that Obama doesn’t like and they send billions of dollars to the wrong people and ignore taxes from campaign backers.

– FEMA puts refugees in toxic trailers.

– The CIA hacks into Senators and the Senators get the NSA to hack back into the CIA as payback.

– INS has a conveyer belt to IMPORT Zeta Cartel members and illegal aliens INTO the U.S.

– NASA can’t keep shit from falling out of the sky onto our heads because part of their agency was given to Elon Musk as a campaign kick-back favor.

– The White House, Itself, has had most of it’s Tier 1 staff quit or get fired, under suspicion of mismanagement of agencies and campaign funds rigging.

– NHTSA know about, and ignored the GM Ignition Safety Scandals and the Tesla Lithium Ion toxic gas and fires issues, at the request of the White House, because campaign backers own those companies.

– The Secret Service broke the record for “Number of Hookers Hired by a Federal Office”.

– The GAO and Congress accuse the FBI of switching from crime-fighting to running Cover-ups on behalf of the White House.

– All agencies are in a national competition to see if Washington DC agency heads or Silicon Valley Campaign backers can hire more hookers-per-hour-with taxpayer-cash while not getting killed by the hookers.

– The GAO and Congress accuse Eric Holder and the DOJ of switching from crime-fighting to running Cover-ups on behalf of the White House.

– The President, himself, is pretty much “Blind-sided” by every single thing that happens and only finds out about pretty much everything later on TV. It’s as if he was Warren Buffet’s puppet in a bubble or something.

– and on, and on and on…. It is like every agency head in Washington JUST GAVE UP and decided they would just steal as much taxpayer cash as they could before they got caught.

Who the hell is in charge?.. oh..nobody!

Send in your links, Let’s discuss…

TT- G-LAtimes

Right-wing obstruction could have been fought: An ineffective and gutless presidency’s legacy is failure

Yes, we know, the crazy House. But we were promised hope and change on big issues. We got no vision and less action

Topics: Thomas Frank, Tom Frank, Barack Obama, Tea Party, Editor’s Picks, Salon Obama failure, Great Recession, “grand bargain”, Income inequality,

Right-wing obstruction could have been fought: An ineffective and gutless presidency's legacy is failure (Credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite/Salon)

Predicting the future course of American politics is a lively and flourishing vocation. Guessing how future generations will commemorate present-day political events, however, is not nearly as remunerative. In the interest of restoring some balance to this tragic situation, allow me to kick off the speculation about the Obama legacy. How will we assess it? How will the Barack Obama Presidential Library, a much-anticipated museum of the future, cast the great events of our time?

In approaching this subject, let us first address the historical situation of the Obama administration. The task of museums, like that of history generally, is to document periods of great change. The task facing the makers of the Obama museum, however, will be pretty much exactly the opposite: how to document a time when America should have changed but didn’t. Its project will be to explain an age when every aspect of societal breakdown was out in the open and the old platitudes could no longer paper it over—when the meritocracy was clearly corrupt, when the financial system had devolved into organized thievery, when everyone knew that the politicians were bought and the worst criminals went unprosecuted and the middle class was in a state of collapse and the newspaper pundits were like street performers miming “seriousness” for an audience that had lost its taste for mime and seriousness both. It was a time when every thinking person could see that the reigning ideology had failed, that an epoch had ended, that the shitty consensus ideas of the 1980s had finally caved in—and when an unlikely champion arose from the mean streets of Chicago to keep the whole thing propped up nevertheless.

The Obama team, as the president once announced to a delegation of investment bankers, was “the only thing between you and the pitchforks,” and in retrospect these words seem not only to have been a correct assessment of the situation at the moment but a credo for his entire term in office. For my money, they should be carved in stone over the entrance to his monument: Barack Obama as the one-man rescue squad for an economic order that had aroused the fury of the world. Better: Obama as the awesomely talented doctor who kept the corpse of a dead philosophy lumbering along despite it all.

The Age of the Zombie Consensus, however poetic it sounds, will probably not recommend itself as a catchphrase to the shapers of the Obama legacy. They will probably be looking for a label that is slightly more heroic: the Triumph of Faith over Cynicism, or something like that. Maybe they will borrow a phrase from one of the 2012 campaign books, “The Center Holds,” and describe the Obama presidency as a time when cool, corporate reason prevailed over inflamed public opinion. Barack Obama will be presented as a kind of second FDR: the man who saved the system from itself. That perhaps the system didn’t deserve saving will be left to some less-well-funded museum.

Another prediction that I can make safely is that the Obama Presidential Library will violate one of the cardinal rules of presidential museums: It will have to be pretty massively partisan. As I noted last week, presidential libraries usually play down partisan conflict in order to make the past seem like a place of national togetherness and the president himself like a man of broadly recognized leadership, but in order for Obama’s presidential library to deliver the usual reassuring message about himself, it will have to stand convention on its head. As president, Obama has been reluctant to take the reinvigorated right too seriously. But as legacy-maker, I predict that he will work to make them seem even crazier and more unstoppable than they actually are.

Why? Because all presidential museums are exercises in getting their subject off the hook, and for Obama loyalists looking back at his years in office, the need for blame evasion will be acute. Why, the visitors to his library will wonder, did the president do so little about rising inequality, the subject on which he gave so many rousing speeches? Why did he do nothing, or next to nothing, about the crazy high price of a college education, the Great Good Thing that he has said, time and again, determines our personal as well as national success? Why didn’t he propose a proper healthcare program instead of the confusing jumble we got? Why not a proper stimulus package? Why didn’t he break up the banks? Or the agribusiness giants, for that matter?

Well, duh, his museum will answer: he couldn’t do any of those things because of the crazy right-wingers running wild in the land. He couldn’t reason with them—their brains don’t work like ours! He couldn’t defeat them at the polls—they’d gerrymandered so many states that they couldn’t be dislodged! What can a high-minded man of principle do when confronted with such a vast span of bigotry and close-mindedness? The answer toward which the Obama museum will steer the visitor is: Nothing.

In point of fact, there were plenty of things Obama’s Democrats could have done that might have put the right out of business once and for all—for example, by responding more aggressively to the Great Recession or by pounding relentlessly on the theme of middle-class economic distress. Acknowledging this possibility, however, has always been difficult for consensus-minded Democrats, and I suspect that in the official recounting of the Obama era, this troublesome possibility will disappear entirely. Instead, the terrifying Right-Wing Other will be cast in bronze at twice life-size, and made the excuse for the Administration’s every last failure of nerve, imagination and foresight. Demonizing the right will also allow the Obama legacy team to present his two electoral victories as ends in themselves, since they kept the White House out of the monster’s grasp—heroic triumphs that were truly worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. (Which will be dusted off and prominently displayed.)

But bipartisanship as an ideal must also be kept sacred, of course. And so, after visitors to the Obama Library have passed through the Gallery of Drones and the Big Data Command Center, they will be ushered into a maze-like exhibit designed to represent the president’s long, lonely, and ultimately fruitless search for consensus. The Labyrinth of the Grand Bargain, it might be called, and it will teach how the president bravely put the fundamental achievements of his party—Social Security and Medicare—on the bargaining table in exchange for higher taxes and a smaller deficit. This will be described not as a sellout of liberal principle but as a sacred quest for the Holy Grail of Washington: a bipartisan coming-together on “entitlement reform,” which every responsible D.C. professional knows to be the correct way forward.

How will all the legacy-shapers of the future regard the Obama movement, the political prairie fire of six years ago that transformed the Senator from Illinois into a folk hero even before he was elected? What will the Obama library have to say about the people who recognized correctly that it was time for “Change” and who showed up at his routine campaign appearances in 2008 by the hundreds of thousands?

It will be a tricky problem. On the up side, those days before his first term began were undoubtedly Obama’s best ones. Mentioning them, however, will remind the visitor of the next stage in his true believers’ political evolution: Disillusionment. Not because their hero failed to win the Grand Bargain, but because he wanted to get it in the first place—because he seemed to believe that shoring up the D.C. consensus was the rightful object of all political idealism. The movement, in other words, won’t fit easily into the standard legacy narrative. Yet it can’t simply be deleted from the snapshot.

Perhaps there will be an architectural solution for this problem. For example, the Obama museum’s designers could make the exhibit on the movement into a kind of blind alley that physically reminds visitors of the basic doctrine of the Democratic Party’s leadership faction: that liberals have nowhere else to go.

My own preference would be to let that disillusionment run, to let it guide the entire design of the Obama museum. Disillusionment is, after all, a far more representative emotion of our times than Beltway satisfaction over the stability of some imaginary “center.” So why not memorialize it? My suggestion to the designers of the complex: That the Obama Presidential Library be designed as a kind of cenotaph, a mausoleum of hope.

Thomas Frank Thomas Frank is a Salon politics and culture columnist. His many books include “What’s The Matter With Kansas,” “Pity the Billionaire” and “One Market Under God.” He is the founding editor of The Baffler magazine.

 

X 60 minutes investigationX BriberyX CorruptionX Dept. of energyX diane feinsteinX DOE CorruptionX Elon MUskX gao investigationX John DoerrX kleiner perkins sex allegationsX NASDAQ: TSLAX Poop TornadoX Sen. GrassleyX Senator UptonX solyndraX Solyndra scandalX Steve SpinnerX Steve WestlyX Throw Them All OutX washington corruptionX washington corruption investigationX washington incompetenceX Thomas FrankX Tom FrankX Barack ObamaX Tea PartyX Editor’s PicksX Salon Obama failureX Great RecessionX “grand bargain”X Income inequalityX Politics News