(REPAIRING SILICON VALLEY) First We Need To Get The Asshole Frat Boys Arrested And Or Fired

(REPAIRING SILICON VALLEY) First We Need To Get The Asshole Frat Boys Arrested And Or Fired

THIS REPORT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE FBI, FINCEN, FTC, FEC, SEC, OGE, DOJ, INTERPOL AND CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATORS (THE MASTER REPORT IS OVER 2000 PAGES). SEE WHY:
TOXIC COMPANIES (LINK)

 

They got together and created an organized crime “tech mafia”.

Problem is…. All mobsters go to prison…

YES, THEY ARE THAT BAD: ACTUAL PLAN TO CREATE A SILICON VALLEY ___MAFIA___ REVEALED BY ABC NEWS

AND: A DETAILED EXAMINATION OF THE CRIME 1.2

OH LOOK: Boys will be boys

THESE GUYS: Building a Psychopath: How Hollywood and Silicon Valley VC’s and Executives Turned Out To Be Such Scumbags

THEIR DELUSIONAL PARTY OF SEX AND DRUGS: Burning Man Aggregates The Single Largest Collection of Assholes On Earth THE SILICON VALLEY TECH MAFIA

MORE ON THAT PARTY: Burning Man Chronicles

THE DIRT ON THE CARTEL: HOW_CORRUPTION_ACTUALLY_WORKS

How Hollywood and Silicon Valley VC’s and Executives Turned Out To Be Such Scumbags

HOW I BRIBE YOU

SAN_FRANCISCO’S_CORRUPTION_CULTURE

SENATORS CRIMES

SILICON VALLEY BURNING MAN SEX CULT

Stanford_University_Teaches_Promotes_And_Protects_Sociopaths_And_Hate

STEVE WESTLY RIGS POLITICS

 

TECHTOPUS – This Lawsuit proves they are a CARTEL

THE_DIRTY_DEEDS_OF_SILICON_VALLEY

THE_DIRTY_DEEDS_OF_SILICON_VALLEY_VOLUME_TWO

The_Silicon_Valley_Tech_Mobster_Cartel

THE_SLUSH_FUND

THE VC CROWD RUNS THE OVAL OFFICE

THE WHITE HOUSE SHILL

TYPICAL SILICON VALLEY TECH MOGUL CAUGHT ON CAMERA BEATING WOMAN – SILICON VALLEY TECH SEX CULT AND ABUSE – THE TECH SEX CULT AND ABUSES

UNJUST ENRICHMENT

How the Elite Scumbag Bosses At Stanford University Got Busted For Selling Snootiness SILICON VALLEYS TECH BRIBES

URANIUM ONE

Why Elon Musk and John Doerr hate hydrogen more than anything on Earth

Links To Third-Party Evidence Files Proving Each And Every Assertion:

https://www.thecreepyline.com

https://www.icij.org

https://stopelonfromfailingagain.com

http://vcracket.weebly.com

https://www.transparency.org

https://www.judicialwatch.org

https://wikileaks.org

https://causeofaction.org

https://fusion4freedom.com/about-gcf/

http://peterschweizer.com/

http://globalinitiative.net

https://fusion4freedom.com/the-green-corruption-files-archive/

https://propublica.org

https://www.allsides.com/unbiased-balanced-news

http://wearethenewmedia.com

http://ec.europa.eu/anti_fraud/index_en.html

http://gopacnetwork.org/

http://www.iaaca.org/News/

http://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Corruption/Corruption

http://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/

http://www.traceinternational.org/

http://www.oge.gov/

https://ogc.commerce.gov/

https://anticorruptionact.org/

http://www.anticorruptionintl.org/

https://represent.us/

http://www.giaccentre.org/dealing_with_corruption.php

http://www.acfe.com/

https://www.oas.org/juridico/english/FightCur.html

https://www.opus.com/international-anti-corruption-day-businesses/

https://www.opengovpartnership.org/theme/anti-corruption

https://www.ethicalsystems.org/content/corruption

https://sunlightfoundation.com/

http://www.googletransparencyproject.org/

http://xyzcase.weebly.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angelgate

https://www.opensecrets.org/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_Litigation

The college bribery scandal reveals an ugly truth: our society is unjust, dominated by a small Silicon Valley elite.

By Barbara Boland • 

 

Actress Lori Loughlin, who has been implicated in the Operation Varsity Blues scandal. Credit: Featureflash Photo Agency/Shutterstock

The most destructive and pervasive myth in America today is that we live in a meritocracy. Our elites, so the myth goes, earned their places at Yale and Harvard, on Wall Street and in Washington—not because of the accident of their birth, but because they are better, stronger, and smarter than the rest of us. Therefore, they think, they’ve “earned” their places in the halls of power and “deserve” to lead.

The fervor with which so many believe this enables elites to lord over those worse off than they are. On we slumber, believing that we live in a country that values justice, instead of working towards a more equitable and authentically meritocratic society.

Take the Operation Varsity Blues scandal. On Tuesday, the FBI and federal prosecutors announced that 50 people had been charged in, as Sports Illustrated put it, “a nationwide college admissions scheme that used bribes to help potential students cheat on college entrance exams or to pose as potential athletic recruits to get admitted to high-profile universities.” Thirty-three parents, nine collegiate coaches, two SAT/ACT exam administrators, an exam proctor, and a college athletics administrator were among those charged. The man who allegedly ran the scheme, William Rick Singer, pled guilty to four charges of racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, conspiracy to defraud the U.S., and obstruction of justice.

As part of the scam, parents would “donate” money to a fake charity run by Singer. The funds would then be laundered to either pay off an SAT or ACT administrator to take the exams or bribe an employee in college athletics to name the rich, non-athlete children as recruits. Virtually every scenario relied on multiple layers of corruption, all of which eventually allowed wealthy students to masquerade as “deserving” of the merit-based college slots they paid up to half a million dollars to “qualify” for.

Cheating. Bribery. Lying. The wealthy and privileged buying what was reserved for the deserving. It’s all there on vivid display. Modern American society has become increasingly and banally corrupt, both in the ways in which “justice” is meted out and in who is allowed to access elite education and the power that comes with it.

The U.S. is now a country where corruption is rampant and money buys both access and outcomes. We pretend to be better than Russia and other oligarchies, but we too are dominated by a rich and powerful elite.

The average American citizen has very little power, as a 2014 study by Princeton University found. The research reviewed 1,779 public policy questions asked between 1981 and 2002 and the responses by different income levels and interest groups; then calculated the likelihood that certain policies would be adopted.

What they found came as no surprise:

A proposed policy change with low support among economically elite Americans (one-out-of-five in favor) is adopted only about 18 percent of the time, while a proposed change with high support (four-out-of-five in favor) is adopted about 45% of the time.

That’s in stark contrast with policies favored by average Americans:

When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites and/or with organised interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the US political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it.

The conclusion of the study? We live in an oligarchy:

…our analyses suggest that majorities of the American public actually have little influence over the policies our government adopts. …[T]he preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.

The belief in the myth of merit hurts the smart kid with great grades who aced his SATs but was still rejected from Yale and Harvard. It hurts talented athletes who have worked their tails off for so many years. It hurts parents who have committed hundreds of school nights and weekends to their children. It hurts HR departments that believe degrees from Ivy League schools mean that graduates are qualified. It hurts all of us who buy into the great myth that America is a democratic meritocracy and that we can achieve whatever we want if only we’re willing to expend blood, toil, sweat, and tears.

At least in an outright class system like the British Houses of Lords and Commons, there is not this farcical playacting of equal opportunity. The elites, with their privilege and titles, know the reason they are there and feel some sense of obligation to those less well off than they are. At the very least, they do not engage in the ritual pretense of “deserving” what they “earned”—quite unlike those who descend on Washington, D.C. believing that they really are better than their compatriots in flyover country.

All societies engage in myth-making about themselves. But the myth of meritocracy may be our most pervasive and destructive belief—and it mirrors the myth that anything like “justice” is served up in our courts.

Remember the Dupont heir who received no prison time after being convicted for raping his three-year-old daughter because the judge ruled that six-foot-four Robert Richards “wouldn’t fare well in prison”? Or the more recent case of billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who had connections to both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump and faced a 53-page federal indictment for sex-trafficking over two dozens underage girls? He received instead a sweetheart deal that concealed the extent of his crimes. Rather than the federal life imprisonment term he was facing, Epstein is currently on house arrest after receiving only 13 months in county jail. The lead prosecutor in that case had previously been reprimanded by a federal judge in another underage sex crimes case for concealing victim information, the Miami Herald reports.

While the rich are able to escape consequences for even the most horrific of crimes, the U.S. has the highest incarceration rate in the world. Approximately 7 million people were under some form of correctional control by the end of 2011, including 2.2 million who were detained in federal, state, and local prisons and jails. One in every 10 black men in his thirties is in prison or jail, and one out of three black men born in 2001 can expect to go to prison in their lifetimes.

While black people make up only 13 percent of the population, they make up 42 percent of death row and 35 percent of those who are executed. There are big racial disparities in charging, sentencing, plea bargaining, and executions, Department of Justice reviews have concluded, and black and brown people are disproportionately found to be innocent after landing on death row. The poor and disadvantaged thereby become grist for a system that cares nothing for them.

Despite all this evidence, most Americans embrace a version of the Calvinist beliefs promulgated by their forebears, believing that the elect deserve their status. We remain confident that when our children apply to college or are questioned by police, they will receive just and fair outcomes. If our neighbors’ and friends’ kids do not, then we assure ourselves that it is they who are at fault, not the system.

The result has been a gaping chasm through our society. Lives are destroyed because, rather than working for real merit-based systems and justice, we worship at the altar of false promises offered by our institutions. Instead we should be rolling up our sleeves and seeing Operation Varsity Blues for what it is: a call to action.

Barbara Boland is the former weekend editor of the Washington Examiner. Her work has been featured on Fox News, the Drudge Report, HotAir.com, RealClearDefense, RealClearPolitics, and elsewhere. She’s the author of Patton Uncovered, a book about General Patton in World War II. Follow her on Twitter @BBatDC.

 

http://www.projectveritasaction.com

Catch and Kill By Ronan Farrow, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch_and_Kill:_Lies,_Spies,_and_a_Conspiracy_to_Protect_Predators

Permanent Record By Edward Snowden, https://www.amazon.com/Permanent-Record-Edward-Snowden/dp/1250237238

Brotopia By Emily Chang, http://brotopiabook.com/

Throw Them All Out By Peter Schweizer, http://peterschweizer.com/books/throw-them-all-out/

The Circle By David Eggers, https://archive.org/details/circle00dave

World Without Mind By Franklin Foer, https://www.amazon.com/World-Without-Mind-Existential-Threat/dp/1101981113

A Journey into the Savage Heart of Silicon Valley By Corey Pein, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35684687-live-work-work-work-die

Disrupted By Dan Lyons, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/26030703-disrupted

Chaos Monkeys By Antonio García Martínez, https://www.antoniogarciamartinez.com/chaos-monkeys/

The Creepy Line By Matthew Taylor, https://www.thecreepyline.com/

The Cleantech Crash By Leslie Stahl, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cleantech-crash-60-minutes/

Congress: Trading stock By Steve Kroft, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/congress-trading-stock-on-inside-information/

Stanford University Is a cesspool of spies and foreign bribes from the governments of China, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Iran.

– 32 San Francisco families are under investigation for influence-peddling Stanford

The Education Department has been asked to run investigations into Stanford University, who has been caught accepting bribes to place rich kids in the school, as part of a continuing review that it says has found U.S. universities failed to report at least $6.5 billion in foreign funding from countries such as China and Saudi Arabia, according to department materials viewed by The Wall Street Journal.

The investigations into the Ivy League schools are the latest in a clash between U.S. universities and a coalition of federal officials including law enforcement, research funders such as the National Institutes of Health, and a bipartisan group in Congress that has raised concerns about higher-education institutions’ reliance on foreign money, particularly from China.

Representatives for Stanford said the regents “hope to avoid any trouble”.

The department described higher-education institutions in the U.S., in a document viewed by the Journal, as “multi-billion dollar, multi-national enterprises using opaque foundations, foreign campuses, and other sophisticated legal structures to generate revenue.”

U.S. universities have generally defended their international collaborations and said the Education Department’s reporting requirements remain unclear, which officials deny.

Universities are required to disclose to the Education Department all contracts and gifts from a foreign source that, alone or combined, are worth $250,000 or more in a calendar year. Though the statute is decades old, the department only recently began to vigorously enforce it.

Officials accused schools of actively soliciting money from foreign governments, companies and nationals known to be hostile to the U.S. and potentially in search of opportunities to steal research and “spread propaganda benefitting foreign governments,” according to the document.

In addition, while the department said it has found foreign money generally flows to the country’s richest universities, “such money apparently does not reduce or otherwise offset American students’ tuition costs,” the document said.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Should Stanford University be wary of accepting money from foreign governments hostile to the U.S., such as China, Russia and Iran? 

U.S. officials say China uses a variety of means to target academia, including government-funded talent recruitment programs such as the Thousand Talents Plan. The arrest last month of the chairman of Harvard’s chemistry department on federal charges of lying about receiving millions of dollars in Chinese funding through the program while the U.S. shelled out more than $15 million to fund his research group catapulted the issue into the spotlight.

In a letter to Harvard dated Tuesday and posted on the Education Department website, officials cited the recent Justice Department case and asked the school to disclose records of gifts or contracts involving the governments of China, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Iran. It also requested records regarding telecommunications giants Huawei Technologies Co. and ZTE Corp. of China; the Kaspersky Lab and Skolkovo Foundation of Russia; and the Alavi Foundation of Iran, among others.

The Education Department said Yale had failed to disclose at least $375 million in foreign funding after filing no reports from 2014-17, according to a document viewed by the Journal. The department, also in a letter Tuesday to the university, sought records regarding contributions from Saudi Arabia, China and its telecom giants, Peking University’s Yenching Academy, the National University of Singapore, Qatar and others. It also asked the university to detail foreign funding of Yale Law School’s Paul Tsai China Center and the new Yale Jackson School of Global Affairs.

The Education Department is alleging that Yale University didn’t disclose at least $375 million in foreign funding and is seeking records from the school.

Photo: Jessica Hill for The Wall Street Journal

If the schools refuse to disclose the information, the Education Department can refer the matter to the Justice Department, which could pursue civil or criminal actions.

Some university officials have dismissed the U.S. government’s broader national security concerns regarding foreign involvement in universities as hyperbolic, or even discriminatory, and said there should be no restrictions on unclassified research meant to be published anyway.

They have also said international collaboration—particularly with China—is essential to advancing scientific discoveries that will benefit humankind.

A February 2019 investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations called foreign government funding of U.S. universities “a black hole” and said it found that nearly 70% failed to properly report funding from Chinese government-backed cultural and language programs known as Confucius Institutes.

Sens. Rob Portman (R., Ohio ) and Tom Carper (D., Del.), who lead the Senate panel, said in a joint statement the Journal: “The fact that $6.5 billion in foreign gifts to U.S. institutions went unreported until now is shocking and unacceptable…We are pleased that the Department of Education is increasing enforcement efforts and taking a step towards ensuring academic freedom in America.”

Education Department officials in June 2019 launched a series of investigations into universities’ foreign funding. The Harvard and Yale investigations are the department’s seventh and eighth probes following others at schools including Georgetown University, Cornell University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Education Department officials said in the document viewed by the Journal that its investigations have prompted public and private universities across the country to come forward since July 2019 to collectively report more than $6.5 billion in previously undisclosed foreign funding.

A spokeswoman for MIT said the university’s reporting of foreign gifts and contracts has been based on “improved processes” since January 2019 and that it is committed to working constructively with federal officials. Georgetown and Cornell didn’t immediately comment.

The Education Department has hit back at university groups that have criticized its recent enforcement drive. For example, in a September 2019 letter addressed to one group that represents more than 200 universities, an official called the universities’ reporting duties “plainly evident.”

He added: “You have asked the Department to ‘work with the higher education community to…balance the interests of transparency and the complicated nature of reporting.’ There is no statutory basis for any such ‘balance.’”

 

  Anne Broache. “FBI wants widespread monitoring of ‘illegal’ Internet activity”. CNET. Retrieved 25 March 2014.

  • Kevin J. Connolly (2003). Law of Internet Security and Privacy. Aspen Publishers. p. 131. ISBN .

  • O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. O’Reilly Media, 1-5.

  • Fuchs, C. (2011). New Media, Web 2.0 and Surveillance. Sociology Compass, 134-147.

  • Fuchs, C. (2011). Web 2.0, Presumption, and Surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 289-309.

  • Anthony Denise, Celeste Campos-Castillo, Christine Horne (2017). “Toward a Sociology of Privacy”. Annual Review of Sociology. 43: 249–269. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053643.

  • Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Demsmarais, S. (2014). ” Creeping” or just information seeking? Gender differences in partner monitoring in response to jealousy on Facebook. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 35-50.

  • [electronics.howstuffworks.com/gadgets/high-tech-gadgets/should-smart-devices-automatically-call-cops.htm. “How Stuff Works”] Check |url= value (help). Retrieved November 10, 2017.

  • [time.com/4766611/alexa-takes-the-stand-listening-devices-raise-privacy-issues “Time Alexa Takes the Stand Listening Devices Raise Privacy Issues”] Check |url= value (help). Retrieved November 10, 2017.

  • Adi Shamir & Eran Tromer. “Acoustic cryptanalysis”. Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University. Retrieved 1 November 2011.

  • “Telephones”. Western Regional Security Office (NOAA official site). 2001. Retrieved March 22, 2009.

  • Samuel, Ian (2008). “Warrantless Location Tracking”. N.Y.U. Law Review. SSRN 1092293.

  • Keefe, Patrick (March 12, 2006). “Can Network Theory Thwart Terrorists?”. New York Times.

  • “HART Overview” (PDF). IPTO (DARPA) – Official website. August 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 5, 2008. Retrieved March 15, 2009.

  • Saska, M.; Chudoba, J.; Preucil, L.; Thomas, J.; Loianno, G.; Tresnak, A.; Vonasek, V.; Kumar, V. Autonomous Deployment of Swarms of Micro-Aerial Vehicles in Cooperative Surveillance. In Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). 2014.

  • Hildebrandt, Mireille; Serge Gutwirth (2008). Profiling the European Citizen: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer. ISBN .

  • Lyman, D., Micheal. Criminal Investigation: The Art and the Science. 6th ed. Pearson, 2010. p249

  • Crowder, Stan, and Turvery E. Brent. Ethical Justice: Applied Issues for Criminal Justice Students and Professionals. 1st ed. Academic Press, 2013. p150. Print.

  • Wolf, Paul. “COINTELPRO”. (online collection of historical documents). Retrieved March 14, 2009.

  • “Domestic CIA and FBI Mail Opening Programs” (PDF). Final Report: Book III, Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans. U.S. Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. April 23, 1976. pp. 559–678. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 5, 2011. Retrieved March 13, 2009.

  • Holden, Matthew H.; Nyrop, Jan P.; Ellner, Stephen P. (June 1, 2016). “The economic benefit of time-varying surveillance effort for invasive species management”. Journal of Applied Ecology. 53 (3): 712–721. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12617. ISSN 1365-2664.

  • Mörner, T.; Obendorf, D. L.; Artois, M.; Woodford, M. H. (April 1, 2002). “Surveillance and monitoring of wildlife diseases”. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics). 21 (1): 67–76. doi:10.20506/rst.21.1.1321. ISSN 0253-1933. PMID 11974631.

  • Baig, Edward; Marcia Stepanek; Neil Gross (April 5, 1999). “Privacy”. Business Week. Archived from the original on October 17, 2008. Retrieved March 20, 2009.

  • Solove, Daniel (2007). “‘I’ve Got Nothing to Hide’ and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy”. San Diego Law Review. 44: 745. SSRN 998565.

  • Foucault, Michel (1979). Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books. pp. 201–202.

  • Chayko, Mary (2017). Superconnected: the internet, digital media, and techno-social life. New York, NY: Sage Publications.

  • Browne, Simone (October 2, 2015). Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Duke University Press Books. p. 224. ISBN .

  • Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 6, California. (July 30, 2008). “People vs. Diaz”. FindLaw. Retrieved February 1, 2017.

  • California Fourth District Court of Appeal (June 25, 2014). “Riley v. California”. Oyez – IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved February 1, 2013.