ALICE: America’s Biggest Bitch IS GOOGLE’S Girlfriend
The Supreme Court made a law, now known as “ALICE”, which only helps the campaign financiers at Google, while it destroys America, piece by piece.
Everyone has seen the news reports about how Google gave more money to the White House, than almost any other entity in America. Then, in exchange, Google got it’s insiders put into more federal management positions than anybody else. It was like Google tried to take-over the U.S. Government.
Eric Schmidt got to hang out at the White House, and create more laws, than any member of Congress even did!
Did you know, though, that Google’s senior staff run the U.S. Patent Office? Yep!
Google put their people in the patent office because they, and their investors, own a huge number of companies that they just used their power and ego to steal technology for.
These hubris-ridden billionaires just stole the technology from others and refused to pay the inventors. When Google’s venture capitalists realized they might have to pay up, they spent their billions lobbying to take out the U.S. patent office by making it impotent.
They set about making software patents, and any new patents ILLEGAL!, with heir tricky ALICE maneuver.
You heard that right. Not only did the Silicon Valley Cartel create an innovation blockade system but they shut down almost all American innovation.
They killed one of the last thing’s that America was known for, in the world: Inventing cool technology.
Now AMERICAN INVENTORS ARE PUNISHED FOR CREATING NEW IDEAS!
Thank you Google! Your ALICE scheme screwed everybody in America!
Google, and it’s Silicon Valley Cartel, has killed off anything that anybody already has that the Google Monopoly wants to do and killed off any new technology that anybody in America wants to create.
The problem started at the US Supreme Court, and all 9 Supreme Court justices agreed with this decision after being lobbied by Google’s whisperers. Everyone else in the system is just “following orders”. The Obama Administration seems to have just handed a large part of the U.S. to Eric Schmidt.
This recent and epic systemic problem in the patent system is damaging a huge number of patents, startups and inventors. It will not be fixed until either the Supreme Court corrects itself, or Congress amends patent law. Both processes are slow. Pretty much every patent attorney, inventor and start-up CEO in the country is screaming about this.
Oover the last year, the USPTO has been denying many software patent applications on the base of a rather vague 2014 decision by the US Supreme Court entitled Alice Corp v. CLS BANK (“Alice”).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_Int%27l
Although the original Alice decision was rather limited, Google, and Eric Schmidt, spent billions in illicit money lobbying against Software patents, and the current USPTO commissioner is a former top Google employee and Eric Schmidt shill. Judges have also been using the Alice decision as a way to clean up crowded court dockets by dismissing patents as being “Abstract”. Because there is no definition of “Abstract”, this is hard to argue with. What is happening on a practical level is that tens or hundreds of thousands of American patents are now being dismissed because they are “software patents”. Google loves this!!!
For a cartoon on this issue, see this link, or below:
http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2014/04/article_0004.html
Under the “misery loves company” concept, this has put the entire software, and high-tech industry, in a bind as well. Unless something happens, high tech is going to suffer horrific damages thanks to the greed and power of Google.
http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202730283930/Its-a-Scary-PostAlice-World-for-Software-Patents?slreturn=20151103215135
Innovation in America is now DEAD. Google is in control of Washington, DC. The U.S. has been relegated to a “Minor Business Power” in the world, now, because Google refuses to pay for what it steals.
Alice v. CLS Bank: United States Supreme Court Establishes General Patentability Test
August 2014
By Julia Powles, Researcher, University of Cambridge, UK
Every patent must satisfy the requirement for patentable subject-matter – or, as it is sometimes known, patent eligibility, or the requirement for “an invention”. In effect, the claimed invention must be the sort of thing that could lead to a patent.
Most countries define subject-matter negatively – things are patentable unless they are excluded by statute or case law. Once this requirement is satisfied, the assessment then turns to fact-specific criteria such as novelty, non-obviousness, industrial applicability, and sufficient description. If the subject-matter requirement is not satisfied, then it’s game-over for the patent.
Subject-matter is a negligible concern for the vast majority of patents. However, due to either express or implied exclusions, it can be a real sticking point in particular domains – most notably, software, biotechnology, and diagnostic and business methods. As an early ground for striking out patents, the subject-matter requirement may seem attractive to patent systems suffering intense backlogs and perceived misuse and abuse. This broader context may reflect why, in the last five years, the United States Supreme Court has issued four influential subject-matter rulings after a nearly 30-year hiatus: Bilski v. Kappos, Mayo v. Prometheus, AMP v. Myriad – all covered in previous editions of this magazine – and, most recently, the highly-anticipated case of Alice v. CLS Bank .
Alice’s abstract ideas
Alice attracted a great deal of interest largely because the patents in issue involved a business method implemented by a computer. Many pundits seized on the case as an opportunity for much-needed guidance on software patenting. However, it was clear from the facts and the hearing that this was unlikely to happen. When the Supreme Court issued its ruling on June 19, 2014, it opted for a narrow basis for its decision, closely tied to the facts at hand, and omitting broader guidance (or, indeed, any mention of the word “software”.)
The four patents in Alice concerned intermediated financial risk settlement (i.e. mitigating the risk that one party to an agreed transaction fails to pay or to satisfy other conditions). The Supreme Court distilled the claims as variants on: a method for exchanging financial obligations; a computer system configured to carry out the method; and a computer-readable medium containing program code for performing the method. The parties to the case were the patentee, Melbourne-based Alice Corp, which had no relevant trading activity in relation to the patents, and New York-based CLS Bank International, which engaged in $US 5 trillion settlements daily employing the patented methods.
Under section 101 of the US Patent Act, “any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may be eligible for patent protection.” The US courts have developed three exclusions to this broad provision: laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas. In the Alice decision, which concerned the “abstract ideas” exclusion, the Supreme Court stated that the principle undergirding these exclusions is “pre-emption”, which it related to the notion that the basic tools, or building blocks, of scientific and technological work must remain in the public domain.
The Court recognized, however, that at some level, “all inventions . . . embody, use, reflect, rest upon, or apply laws of nature, natural phenomena, or abstract ideas.” Lest the exclusions “swallow all of patent law”, the Court sought to distinguish patents that claim the building blocks of human ingenuity from those that integrate those building blocks into “something more”.
Bilski reloaded, with dashings of Mayo
One of the primary reasons the Supreme Court heard the Alice case was that the Federal Circuit en banc decision , issued on May 10, 2013, had yielded a deeply fractured set of opinions, failing to agree the nuances of the appropriate test for patent eligibility. Among the causes were perceived inconsistencies in the Supreme Court’s precedent. The Supreme Court in Alice therefore took the opportunity to articulate a single, uniform subject-matter test. That test, itself a generalization from the earlier case of Mayo v. Prometheus, involves two parts:
First, we determine whether the claims at issue are directed to one of those patent-ineligible concepts [i.e. law of nature, natural phenomena, or abstract idea].
If so, we then ask, “[w]hat else is there in the claims before us?” To answer that question, we consider the elements of each claim both individually and “as an ordered combination” to determine whether the additional elements “transform the nature of the claim” into a patent-eligible application. We have described step two of this analysis as a search for an “inventive concept”—i.e., an element or combination of elements that is “sufficient to ensure that the patent in practice amounts to significantly more than a patent upon the [ineligible concept] itself.”
Applying this two- step test led the nine justices of the Supreme Court to find unanimously that Alice’s patents were invalid for lack of patentable subject-matter. Unhelpfully for future guidance, the Court considered it need not “labor to delimit the precise contours of the “abstract ideas” category”. Within its reasons, however, it gave several examples of abstract ideas: fundamental economic practices; certain methods of organizing human activities; an idea in itself; and mathematical relationships/formulas. Turning to the second step, the Court concluded:
We hold that the claims at issue are drawn to the abstract idea of intermediated settlement, and that merely requiring generic computer implementation [i.e. a data processing system, a communications controller, and a data storage unit] fails to transform that abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention.
In the end, the Alice ruling is remarkably proximate to the factual findings in Bilski v. Kappos – where a risk-hedging business method was found to be an ineligible abstract idea – as well as to the legal findings in Mayo, where, in applying the two-step test, a diagnostic method was deemed an ineligible law of nature, applied with only conventional steps, and was therefore ineligible.
By contrast, Alice sits somewhat less comfortably with AMP v. Myriad, a decision subsequent to Mayo that notably omitted reference to the two-step test. Instead, Myriad was decided in accordance with older authorities that involved biological subject-matter – Diamond v. Chakrabarty and Funk v. Kalo. In Myriad, the Court held that isolated genes were unpatentable natural phenomena. More problematic, particularly in light of the Mayo/Alice test, was its finding that lab-generated cDNA is patent eligible, despite the fact that it is produced from isolated genes (i.e. natural phenomena), with the addition of only conventional, routine steps.
Implications for software patents
More meritorious computer-implemented inventions were not directly addressed in the Alice decision, except to the extent that the Court confirmed the uncontroversial proposition, established by cases in the 1970s and 80s, that inventions improving the functioning of a computer itself (i.e. for speed, efficiency, or security), or effecting an improvement in any other technology or technical field, are patentable.
Alice emphasized very strongly that merely stating an abstract idea, while adding the words “apply it” with a generic computer and generic computer functions, is not sufficient. This emphasis, while it holds instinctive appeal, creates difficulties if applied to other types of non-computer-based inventions. It also fails to accommodate the way in which computer-implementation may allow an idea to be realized at a scale and speed impossible through other means, with considerable programming skill required in order to achieve such an outcome.
Incongruously, it is plausible under the Mayo/Alice test that a sophisticated idea, implemented using generic code and computing platforms, might not be patentable; while a generic idea, implemented using unusual platforms, may be.
An interesting aspect of the Alice ruling is the way that the Court characterized Diamond v. Diehr. This is an important Supreme Court authority from 1981, concerning a computer-implemented method for calculating temperature within a rubber mould during a step-wise rubber curing process that was found to be patentable. Adopting a reading of Diehr that appears to be novel within US Supreme Court precedent – even if it chimes with international authorities – the Court in Alice described the invention in Diehr as patentable because it used an otherwise unpatentable equation to “solve a technological problem” and “improve an existing technological process”. This reflects an interesting shift in the US jurisprudence, and a possible gravitation towards the approach of Europe and other jurisdictions.
A decision of the Federal Circuit shortly after Alice gave an indication of how it may be applied more broadly. In Digitech v. Electronics for Imaging, the Federal Circuit rejected a patent that claimed a method for manipulating data in a digital image processing system. The reasoning was that the patent claim:
recites an ineligible abstract process of gathering and combining data that does not require input from a physical device… Without additional limitations, a process that employs mathematical algorithms to manipulate existing information to generate additional information is not patent eligible.
The bounds of expressions used in the Alice decision, such as “generic”, “technological”, “inventive concept” – and the magical quality of “transformation” into “something more” – will doubtless be picked over in cases to come.
The merits of a subject-matter requirement
One question not explored in Alice, but worthy of broader reflection, is whether the requirement for patentable subject-matter is even useful to the patent system at all. The problem with the requirement is that it is a coarse filter and encourages satellite debate of the nature described above. It involves potentially eliminating patents based on limited information and deprives the patent system of its best qualities – namely, taking a set of claims at a particular point in time and comparing them against hard evidence to determine whether they objectively satisfy novelty, non-obviousness, industrial applicability, and sufficient description. Instead, subject-matter is an impressionistic, somewhat unpredictable assessment, and overlaps dangerously with novelty and inventive step. This is seen in the Alice case itself, where the Court was clearly influenced by the fact that intermediated settlement was a long-occurring practice.
The utility and application of the subject-matter criterion differs between jurisdictions. In Europe, it has led to a considerable standoff between the UK courts and the European Patent Office. The UK courts take the view that subject-matter should be a real threshold and have devised complicated tests for its assessment, while the EPO has a considerably lower bar for subject-matter, but it then considers exclusions on software, business methods, and other express exclusions “as such” at the novelty and non-obviousness stages, finding this a more practically workable solution.
One of the principal lures of the subject-matter criterion is that it stops weak patents from clogging the system. The problem is that it is rather an inefficient and ineffective tool for doing so. Tests such as that expounded in Alice and analogues in jurisdictions such as the UK might appear simple, but they turn on tortuous analyses of undefined and unspecific, yet familiar, terms. Particularly in the case of expressions such as “technological”, “technical” and “inventive concept”, there are further issues when these expressions are used in other parts of patent law in very different ways. This all confuses, rather than assists, understanding, and can mask what are in the end very subjective decisions.
Overall, Alice’s enduring significance comes from establishing Mayo’s two-step test as a general test for US patentable subject-matter. It will be fascinating to see if this produces any significant changes in software, biotechnology, and diagnostic and business method patenting, both in the US and internationally.
ABOUT THIS INVESTIGATIVE TRUE CRIME WIKI:
This is a detailed examination of the political corruption that is destroying society. Your public officials are profiting from, and preventing the interdiction of, the bribes, cronyism, stock market insider trading payola, contract quid-pro-quo and revolving door jobs scams that are destroying Democracy. Big Tech billionaires control your government; not you. It is time to fix that by suing them, firing them, exposing them in the media and news documentaries , bankrupting their stock holdings, voting them out of office and ACTUALLY enforcing the bribery laws!!! (LINK)
READ MORE ABOUT THE BIG TECH AND WHITE HOUSE CORRUPTION CARTEL:
INTERNET SAFETY AND PERSONAL SECURITY REPORTS
SEE THESE REPORTS COMPILED BY CONGRESSIONAL AND INTERNET SECURITY EXPERTS. A PHONE OR WEB DEVICE GETS HACKED EVERY TWO SECONDS. YOUR PHONE AND 'SMART DEVICES' HAVE THOUSANDS OF WAYS TO LET HACKERS IN. FOLLOW THESE TIPS TO KEEP YOURSELF, AND YOUR FAMILY, SAFE!
http://no-hack.org/PERSONAL INTERNET SECURITY 2024B.pdf
http://no-hack.org/websafe.pdf
Please share these documents with your friends and work-mates that are on the internet!
------------------------------------------------------------
https://nationalnewsnetwork.net
http://www.report-corruption.com
https://www.allsides.com/unbiased-balanced-news
https://www.openthebooks.com
https://gawker-media-attacks.weebly.com
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/suck-it-wall-street
https://nationalnewsnetwork.net
https://case-xyz2020a.com
http://www.stimulus-scam.com
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/1uc1zyfmncjcup7/AABbLPzOjaX7DF-5loqMtQD_a?dl=0
http://www.dirtysenator.com
https://www.transparency.org
https://wikileaks.org
https://causeofaction.org
http://peterschweizer.com/
https://propublica.org
https://www.allsides.com/unbiased-balanced-news
http://wearethenewmedia.com
http://ec.europa.eu/anti_fraud/index_en.html
http://www.iaaca.org/News/
http://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Corruption/Corruption
http://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/
http://www.traceinternational.org/
http://www.oge.gov/
https://ogc.commerce.gov/
http://www.anticorruptionintl.org/
http://www.giaccentre.org/dealing_with_corruption.php
https://www.contagious.com/news-and-views/shoshana-zuboff-on-the-age-of-surveillance-capitalism
https://stopelonfromfailingagain.com
https://nypost.com/2018/07/21/elon-musk-is-a-total-fraud/
https://townhall.com/columnists/lawrencemeyers/2019/09/10/elon-musk-passes-the-hat-again-on-capitol-hill-and-in-china-n2552839
https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/inventions/elon-musk-is-a-total-fraud/news-story/f849a58894956424f03e7606a222b9eb
Only the most pathetically naive and ignorant of citizens still do not know that EVERY government, medical and corporate network, and all their files, have been hacked over, and over. Never trust your private data to a network. Assume that every dirty secret of the corrupt oligarchs and crooked politicians is now on the web, or about to be. Deeds done in the dark will always come to light!
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/09/27/teslas-elon-musk-is-a-liar-he-will-do-anything-to-keep-stocks-elevated-blaine-capital.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/15/tesla-whistleblower-tweets-details-about-flawed-cars-scrapped-parts.html
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-24/tesla-slams-tree-florida-bursting-flames-and-killing-driver
http://www.acfe.com/
https://www.oas.org/juridico/english/FightCur.html
https://www.opus.com/international-anti-corruption-day-businesses/
https://www.opengovpartnership.org/theme/anti-corruption
https://www.ethicalsystems.org/content/corruption
https://sunlightfoundation.com/
http://www.googletransparencyproject.org/
http://xyzcase.weebly.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angelgate
https://www.opensecrets.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_Litigation
http://www.projectveritasaction.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch_and_Kill:_Lies,_Spies,_and_a_Conspiracy_to_Protect_Predators
https://www.amazon.com/Permanent-Record-Edward-Snowden/dp/1250237238
http://brotopiabook.com/
http://peterschweizer.com/books/throw-them-all-out/
https://archive.org/details/circle00dave
https://www.amazon.com/World-Without-Mind-Existential-Threat/dp/1101981113
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35684687-live-work-work-work-die
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/26030703-disrupted
https://www.antoniogarciamartinez.com/chaos-monkeys/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cleantech-crash-60-minutes/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/congress-trading-stock-on-inside-information/
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/suck-it-wall-street
HELP BANKRUPT CORRUPT BIG TECH AND THEIR CRONY POLITICOS!
Tesla, Facebook, Google, Alphabet, Netflix, and their owner's are corrupt operators of crimes against the public. Their election rigging, bribes, domestic spying, sex trafficking execs and money-laundering require that they be forced into bankruptcy.
We have hunted down every single one of our attackers and had them: sued and/or bankrupted and/or arrested and/or indicted and/or fired and/or boycotted and/or exposed in books and documentaries and/or investigated by law enforcement, intelligence and regulatory agencies and/or placed under surveillance and/or financially tracked across all of their family trust funds, shell corporations, money-laundering and campaign finance accounts and/or targeted in Congressional investigations that we developed and/or removed from office and otherwise addressed for the rest of their lives.
We are destroying political corruption by legally destroying all of the tools of the corrupt!
By comparing records and files from FINCEN, FBI, FTC, SEC, Congressional Investigators, ICIJ, FEC, DOJ, ProPublica, and other sources, one can easily see that Bay Area political officials own Google, Tesla, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, et al, (AKA “The Tech Cartel” or, in legal terms: “The Enterprise“). This explains why those companies have been exempt from regulation and prosecution. Those public officials and tech company oligarchs have exchanged millions, and millions, of dollars between themselves and their families for profiteering.
They were all either financed by, friends, with, sleeping with, dating the staff of, holding stock market assets in, promised a revolving door job or government service contracts from, partying with, personal friends with, photographed at private events with, exchanging emails with, business associates of or directed by; our business adversaries, or the Senators and politicians that those business adversaries pay campaign finances to, or supply political digital search manipulation services to. Criminal U.S. Senators coordinated and profited in these schemes. Their own family members have now supplied evidence against them. You don’t hear about this, much, in the “main-stream news” because nearly half of Congress, White House staff and government agency bosses own the stock in the news broadcasters and receive billions of dollars of financing from them.
Many witnesses have now sworn, warranted and certified to federal law enforcement about the details of these crimes. Many of those whistle-blowers were former executives in “The Tech Cartel’.
This is not about politics. It is about felony crimes! Our government representatives are business partners with our biggest enemies and make decisions based on greed, not duty! Call them out! Demand their arrests!
COMPUTERS (ai) NOW CREATE ANTI-CORRUPTION DOSSIERS ON EACH CORRUPT PUBLIC FIGURE
Since 2008, server data shows that billions of people, around the globe, have viewed this site and also the vast number of AI generated clones of this transparency site on crowd-sourced servers world-wide. It is now impossible for any party to cover this quid pro quo corruption scheme up. The posted evidence is clear and irrefutable. The names of all those in the media, judicial and public offices, who persist in the cover-up and obfuscation of justice in this matter are publicly posted and their firings are pursued.
THE BIG TECH STOCK MARKET BRIBES BEING PAID TO YOUR POLITICIANS
CROOKED JUDGES AND POLITICIANS WILL DO ANYTHING TO COVER THIS UP AND PROTECT THEIR STOCK MARKET INSIDER TRADING BRIBES. LOOK AT THEIR FAMILY STOCK MARKET TRANSACTIONS AND YOU CAN SEE THE TRUTH! THERE IS A CIVIL WAR IN AMERICA BETWEEN DNC AND GOP BUT THIS IS ABOUT CRIME, NOT IDEOLOGIES. THE DOJ AND THE COURTS SEEM TO ONLY WORK FOR WHITE HOUSE FINANCIERS, SO THE PUBLIC HAS TO SEEK JUSTICE NOW!
WE CAN'T FIND A SINGLE JUDGE, GOVT OFFICIAL OR DOJ EXECUTIVE WHO DOES NOT OWN STOCK IN THE PERPS OR GET A SECRET CONTRACT, REAL ESTATE DEAL OR OTHER PERK FROM THEM!
This site was created, over a decade ago, FOR direct evidence review by the FBI, IG, AG, FTC, SEC and other law enforcement and regulatory agencies that we report to. All of this evidence has been provided to them during that time. This information proves that a quid pro quo stock market bribery scam exists within, and between, agencies and politicians.
Our politicians take bribes in the form of stock market securities, real estate and internet data manipulation services from Google, Facebook, etc. These politicians are CRIMINALS that only work for themselves.
The White House ordered our case pulled from a Court with a Republican Judge and had it moved to a Court with a Democrat party judge who was friends with, and invested in, the perpetrators, so that their insider Judge could dismiss the case. Talk about 'dirty tricks'...
Since 2008, server data shows that billions of people, around the globe, have viewed this site and also the vast number of AI generated clones of this transparency site on crowd-sourced servers world-wide. It is now impossible for any party to cover this quid pro quo corruption scheme up. The posted evidence is clear and irrefutable. The names of all those in the media, judicial and public offices, who persist in the cover-up and obfuscation of justice in this matter are publicly posted and their firings are pursued.
We lived with, socialized with, worked with and got inside scoops from, these politicians. They told us how their crimes and schemes worked. We have the proof of their quid pro quo organized crime scams.
See further evidence sets at: https://case-xyz2020a.com and/or http://www.report-corruption.com and/or https://never-give.in and/or http://hardforensics.com and/or http://www.stimulus-scam.com and the Court and Congressional Investigation archives
Plaintiffs assisted law enforcement and regulatory officials in an investigation of a trillion dollar energy industry scam involving stocks, off-shore mining and election manipulation by public officials.
In retaliation/reprisal against Plaintiffs, government staff cut off benefits income and housing. They cut off government contracts and funding. They blocked patent monetization income. They used their media network, designed to kill off competing Presidential candidates, to run global character assassination revenge attacks against Plaintiffs (via Google, Gawker, Gizmodo, Media Matters, Black Cube, etc.). They used White House 'Plumbers' (Carney, Podesta, Schmidt, Denton, Rattner, Gibbs, Axelrod, etc.) to operate dirty tricks operations. They exposed Plaintiffs to toxins at the Department of Energy labs. They manipulated and 'red flagged' HR databases to cut off jobs for Plaintiffs. The attackers engaged in the bribery of contracting officers and agents to damage competitors and only award the attackers associates. The attackers engaged in internet server manipulation and website spoofing. The attackers used manipulation of online payment transaction systems to cut off Plaintiffs revenue. The state-sponsored attackers also engaged in: Hacking of competitors/witnesses devices; theft of patent materials; threats and possible murders of whistle-blowers; ordering crony's and NVCA allies to black-list competitors/witnesses; bribery of public officials to direct funds and contracts to them and away from competitors/witnesses competing products; government funds embezzlement; placement of sabotage moles, working for the White House, in competitors/witnesses companies to sabotage Plaintiffs plans and report internal data to competitors; Honey traps; DNS re-routing of all internet connections of competitors/witnesses; and more...
FBI-grade evidence and proof of these assertions has been filed in this case.
We are teaching the corrupt politician lapdogs and their Big Tech oligarch bosses that their abusive, self-dealing ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.
If you have the skills and resources to eliminate this kind of horrific evil, on behalf of the public, then you have a moral obligation to do so.
- Expose and bankrupt San Francisco for being a corrupt, crony cesspool of insider quid pro quo, election rigging and Congressional manipulation. Get as many people as possible to leave the City, reduce it's tax base and dissolve it's political power. Punish it for using elitist cronyism to harm citizens and national public policy.
- Expose and bankrupt the Silicon Valley Cartel RICO-law violating monopoly Big Tech oligarchs
- Expose and bankrupt the crooked Big Tech law firms, CPA's, lobbyists and hit-job bloggers who do the dirty work for the Big Tech cartel and their White House stooges.
- Mass distribute all of the insider document leaks that prove the crimes and corruption of the Big Tech insiders.
- Expose all of their dirty deeds including: trillions of dollars of influence peddling between famous politicians and secret corporate and family accounts; money laundering; sex trafficking, hookers and 'executive sex clubs' like NXVIUM, One Taste, Moscow Lovelies, Rosewood hotel hookers, etc; killing teens by hiding teen suicides and mental health issues caused by T-mobile social media; family alcoholism; political bribery using pacs and dark money cash relays; stock market manipulations for their own insider trading; infidelities and spousal abuse as shown in their court records; organized media censorship by the Silicon Valley media cartel; misogyny and sex extortion of workers; fake tax exempt 'charities' that exist only for political money laundering; forcing "issues" on us that they covertly own the companies of; dynastic family manipulations of public policy; buying stocks in Dept of Energy funded projects that are then pumped-and-dumped for unjust wind-fall profits; election rigging using Google, Facebook, Youtube and their media cartel; search engine bias and shadow banning of competitors and reporters; big tech monopolies information manipulation; recession causing market anti-trust law violations; corporate hiring racism; Brotopia frat boy rape culture in their companies and offices; secret offshore shell corporations to hide money; venture capital NVCA funding black-lists; collusion between Sand Hill Road, Palo Alto VC's on finance black-lists, valuation prices and monopolies; patent thefts, USPTO bribes and attacks on small inventors; political payola using stealth real estate, fine art and jewelry holdings; graft via bribes with event tickets, dinners, tax waivers, vacations, pretend speaking contracts, etc; corrupt lobbyists who hire Fusion GPS, Gawker, Black Cube, Google and other character assassination services; White House 'plumbers'; and their use of our democracy as their play-thing...
Accomplishments: So far, in consequence, these bastards have suffered billions of dollars of stock market valuation losses; gotten fired; been sued; had almost every law enforcement and regulatory agency open investigations against them; had their staff leak their emails and documents; been connected to the Panama Papers and other leaks; been IRS audited; had their wives leave them over sex scandals; had their businesses go belly-up; been the subject of expose' books and documentaries... and it isn't over yet...
_____
Criminal politicians and their Silicon Valley oligarch financiers organized a felony-class 'enterprise' to exchange stock market shares, jobs, government cash, sex, exclusive public policy switcheroos and other corrupt actions. They put hit jobs on their competitors and whistle-blowers using government resources. Now those crooks need to be sued and have criminal referrals filed against them with the FBI, DOJ, SEC, FTC, GAO, FEC, FINCEN and Congress! The FBI, and other law enforcement organizations, define a "cartel" as: 'An association of industrialists and business firms organized covertly to establish a national, or international monopoly, by price fixing and ownership of controlling stock, to operate a trust or monopoly to reduce competition between themselves by allocating markets, censoring public knowledge, manipulating governments or controlling the price and production of a product or service.' The 'Stimulus Funds' and 'BBB' funds have been directed to benefit certain Senator's stock market accounts - DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT!
This case is about a "cartel" which meets every aspect of that definition.
CUT-OFF STOCK MARKET OWNERSHIP/BRIBES BY ALL POLITICIANS AND THEIR FAMILIES!!
Plaintiffs demand a JURY TRIAL where the Judges and public officials have had a stock ownership report, investigated by securities forensic experts, proving that they, and their families don't own the stocks of, and get bribes from, the Defendants!
_____
WINNING! WE ALWAYS WIN OUR CASES!!!
This is your CITIZENS VS. CORRUPTION score-card and guess who is WINNING: WE ARE!
When we "WIN" our cases, it is not about getting money. It is about beating up the bad guys. We have WON all of our anti-corruption lawsuits, cases and efforts.
When we sue/target corrupt public officials, or mobster big tech oligarchs, this is what we accomplished when WE WON:
1. We got major public officials investigated, fired, indicted, exposed, sued and shamed over their corruption.
2. We got multiple federal investigations launched, Congressional reports published and new laws made that jammed up their corruption.
3. We got national broadcast news segments produced on major TV shows, about their corruption.
4. We got evidence of their corruption permanently posted on court and judiciary servers for all of the public to see how their corruption works.
5. We got tens of thousands of news articles produced and published about their crimes (ie: Chu, Epstein, etc.)
6. We got a huge number of web tv segments produced and broadcast on everything from TIKTOK to YOUTUBE, about the crooks, globally.
7. We got their dirty tax records, secret accounts, hookers and other misdeeds exposed.
8. We exposed the networks of crooks that help the bad guys do their dirty deeds (ie: Panama Papers, Swiss Leaks, etc.)
9. We filed multiple lawsuits that shamed them and sent the forensic investigators and reporters right to their front doors.
10. We got corrupt City Halls, (ie: SF) and their dirty networks of insiders, exposed and made them lose their political power.
11. We got the cyber-assassin bloggers they hired to attack us, placed under surveillance for the rest of their lives and bankrupted their tabloid rags.
12. After Elon Musk hired attackers to "take us out" because we reported him to Congress, we returned the favor by helping get over 100 lawsuits and federal investigations launched against the scumbag tech mobster.
13. And more... (SEE THIS LINK: TO-KILL-A-GIANT )...
We have hunted down every single one of our attackers and had them: sued and/or bankrupted and/or arrested and/or indicted and/or fired and/or boycotted and/or exposed in books and documentaries and/or investigated by law enforcement, intelligence and regulatory agencies and/or placed under surveillance and/or financially tracked across all of their family trust funds, shell corporations, money-laundering and campaign finance accounts and/or targeted in Congressional investigations that we developed and/or removed from office and otherwise addressed for the rest of their lives.
WE HAVE NEVER LOST A CASE! WE HAVE A 100% SUCCESS RATE!
By comparing records and files from FINCEN, FBI, FTC, SEC, Congressional Investigators, ICIJ, FEC, Interpol, CIA, DOJ, ProPublica, and other sources, we have helped you easily see that political officials own Google, Tesla, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, et al, (AKA "The Tech Cartel" or, in legal terms: "The Enterprise"). This explains why those companies have been exempt from regulation and prosecution. Those public officials (Senators, White House executives, Congress) and tech company oligarchs have exchanged millions, and millions, of dollars between themselves and their families for unjust gain via political profiteering.
They were all either financed by, friends, with, sleeping with, dating the staff of, holding stock market assets in, promised a revolving door job or government service contracts from, partying with, personal friends with, photographed at private events with, exchanging emails with, business associates of or directed by; our business adversaries, or the Senators and politicians that those business adversaries pay campaign finances to, or supply political digital search manipulation services to. Criminal U.S. Senators coordinated and profited in these schemes. Their own family members have now supplied evidence against them. You don't hear about this, much, in the "main-stream news" because nearly half of Congress, White House staff and government agency bosses own the stock in the news broadcasters and receive billions of dollars of financing from them.
Many witnesses, including us, have now sworn, warranted and certified to federal law enforcement about the details of these crimes. Many of those whistle-blowers were former executives in "The Tech Cartel'.
In all of recorded history, there has never been so much taxpayer cash given to so few people, where each, and every, one of the recipients was a friend of the politician giving away the taxpayer cash and everyone who got the cash immediately skimmed "unjust profits" and shut down the business. Almost everyone who was not a friend of the politician, was considered a competitor, and was attacked and sabotaged using state and federal resources. These are felony-class crimes that has cost taxpayers trillions of dollars in losses. Evidence proving this, as fact, many times over, has now been published.
How the main part of these schemes work: 1.) Politician (ie: Feinstein family members) buys stock in company "X" and it's suppliers based on insider tip... 2.) Politician rigs government money to go to company "X" (ie: Tesla or Solyndra)... 3.) Goldman Sachs & Google promote (pump) company "X" stock and skim fee's from the valuation increase...4.) Politician gets profits from the pumped stock value...5.) Politician rigs decision process so that no competitors to Company "X" are allowed to get government funds or help...6.) Politician gets service's "bills" from lawyers and consultant's that are padded hundreds of times over...7) Politician pays over-charged bills with government funds and lawyers put the extra money in real estate, search engines, sex brothels and other things that Politician can take ownership of later on...8.) Company "X" arranges for Universities and corporations to hire Politician for $300,000.00 "speaker fee's" and Netflix revolving door payola "Board Positions" that are really just bribery conduits...9.) Goldman Sachs relay's Politicians extra money to off-shore money laundering outlets... RINSE - REPEAT...
This is not about politics. It is about felony crimes! Some of your government representatives are business partners with America's biggest enemies and make decisions based on greed, not duty! Sue them, expose them, shame them for all of time!